<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Seahorses Evolved To Swim Standing Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Geerts</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1899045</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Geerts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1899045</guid>
		<description>According to the authors swimming upright was favoured by natural selection. As a proponent of evolution by natural experiment I believe that the enormous expansion of sea grass habitats allowed the ancestors of the sea horses to move into a new habitat in which was little or no selection pressure. That means that the upright position evolved because of a lack of selection, natural or otherwise.
Martin Geerts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the authors swimming upright was favoured by natural selection. As a proponent of evolution by natural experiment I believe that the enormous expansion of sea grass habitats allowed the ancestors of the sea horses to move into a new habitat in which was little or no selection pressure. That means that the upright position evolved because of a lack of selection, natural or otherwise.<br />
Martin Geerts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GQ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1751223</link>
		<dc:creator>GQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1751223</guid>
		<description>Now granted, I didn&#039;t read the paper that I&#039;m sure they published on this but your header says they&#039;ve &quot;proved&quot; how seahorses evolved to swim standing up. So where&#039;s the proof? Saying &quot;grass is upright, and so are the seahorses, therefore that&#039;s WHY they&#039;re upright&quot; doesn&#039;t sound very scientific to me... What about all those creatures that live inthe long grass that haven&#039;t evolved to swim upright. How come they survived?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now granted, I didn&#8217;t read the paper that I&#8217;m sure they published on this but your header says they&#8217;ve &#8220;proved&#8221; how seahorses evolved to swim standing up. So where&#8217;s the proof? Saying &#8220;grass is upright, and so are the seahorses, therefore that&#8217;s WHY they&#8217;re upright&#8221; doesn&#8217;t sound very scientific to me&#8230; What about all those creatures that live inthe long grass that haven&#8217;t evolved to swim upright. How come they survived?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1751179</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1751179</guid>
		<description>No, VonSkippy, man pees standing up because it&#039;s so much fun.

Timm, get a life. The hypotheses of scientific thought are vastly preferable to blindly accepting the word of a cult leader with preposterous ideas and no basis in fact. For example, Jim Jones and L Ron Hubbard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, VonSkippy, man pees standing up because it&#8217;s so much fun.</p>
<p>Timm, get a life. The hypotheses of scientific thought are vastly preferable to blindly accepting the word of a cult leader with preposterous ideas and no basis in fact. For example, Jim Jones and L Ron Hubbard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1751045</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1751045</guid>
		<description>See Neatorama article about &quot;The Science News Cycle.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Neatorama article about &#8220;The Science News Cycle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gambit</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1750919</link>
		<dc:creator>Gambit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1750919</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s a bunch of bull crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a bunch of bull crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VonSkippy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1750679</link>
		<dc:creator>VonSkippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1750679</guid>
		<description>&quot;How Seahorses Evolved To Swim Standing Up&quot;

Pretty much the same way that man evolved to pee standing up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How Seahorses Evolved To Swim Standing Up&#8221;</p>
<p>Pretty much the same way that man evolved to pee standing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timm</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1749508</link>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 05:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1749508</guid>
		<description>I have always been dumbfounded by how researchers profess to know how many things have come to be.  

I mean without OBSERVING something first hand  you can&#039;t really KNOW how something developped.  

Sure you can throw all matter of complexity, theory, hypothesis, etc. at something and say it&#039;s true when you are all done lookingat the data as you see it,  but you&#039;d just be kidding yourself if you said you knew it came to be this way or that because of whatever factors you decided to look at...

But to their credit at least they throw in words like think, may, could, etc.  That way in ten years when their idea look like total crap they can never take less responsibility for their crap ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been dumbfounded by how researchers profess to know how many things have come to be.  </p>
<p>I mean without OBSERVING something first hand  you can&#8217;t really KNOW how something developped.  </p>
<p>Sure you can throw all matter of complexity, theory, hypothesis, etc. at something and say it&#8217;s true when you are all done lookingat the data as you see it,  but you&#8217;d just be kidding yourself if you said you knew it came to be this way or that because of whatever factors you decided to look at&#8230;</p>
<p>But to their credit at least they throw in words like think, may, could, etc.  That way in ten years when their idea look like total crap they can never take less responsibility for their crap ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalel</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1749201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comment-1749201</guid>
		<description>Antiquarian aqui-equines defy neigh-sayers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antiquarian aqui-equines defy neigh-sayers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:34:04 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1512 seconds -->
