Saudi Judge: Slapping a Spendthrift Wife is OK

Not content with allowing old men to marry underaged girls, a Saudi Arabia judge is doing one better in promoting equal treatment of womenkind in the Kingdom:

Husbands are allowed to slap their wives if they spend lavishly, a Saudi judge said recently during a seminar on domestic violence, Saudi media reported Sunday.

Arab News, a Saudi English-language daily newspaper based in Riyadh, reported that Judge Hamad Al-Razine said that "if a person gives SR 1,200 [$320] to his wife and she spends 900 riyals [$240] to purchase an abaya [the black cover that women in Saudi Arabia must wear] from a brand shop and if her husband slaps her on the face as a reaction to her action, she deserves that punishment."

Link

Update 5/11/08 - Clarification: it's not the same judge that ruled that the marriage between a 58-year-old man and the 8-year-old girl was legitimate - Thanks seefish3!

Hello, the stone age called, they'd like their dumbass ideology back.

Of course it's hard to tell who's more to blame - the self centered ego maniac men, or the doormat-esque women that put up with them?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not to back him up, but you'll notice reading the article, that this is one man's opinion on this subject, not a tenet of Islamic law.

Besides, this is just one of those "Don't forget we're all supposed to hate someone" articles designed to keep our blood pressure up.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@alex

You've also managed to imply in your headline that this is the same judge that ruled on underage marriage, when it isn't.

And sure, we've got judges in this country against Roe vs. Wade. Have they overturned it? Will we let them?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I agree with seefish3.
Now, I'm an Atheist American and a feminist. But, I am not ethnocentric, unlike this article and others like it that I have seen here.
I don't think women should be beaten, or married against their will. But I do believe in cultural relativism; What is deviance in my culture is not universally deviant.

These women are not "doormats", this is the culture into which they were socialized, it is what they know.
Americans haven't much to stand on anyway. Women only got the right to vote in 1919, and we still do not receive equal wages for equal work.
There are many ways in which Islam provides more to women than traditional Western christian society. Women in Islam have been traditionally allowed to own their own property, even in marriage they retain their rights to what was theirs before the marriage. According to Islam (but not all islamic countries) women can initiate a divorce from their husbands, and can stipulate certain conditions in a marriage contract.
Until recently Women did not have these rights in the US. Islam has been providing such rights since its inception.

The Islamic Arabic culture has a very different history than we do, we cannot presume to judge. Culture is not static. Values change over time. Right now the conservatives of the Arabic world are gaining control, and a lot of that is a reaction to US actions in the Islamic world.

I wish women were considered equal to men around the world, but they aren't anywhere. Not in the US, not in Saudi Arabia.
So how about at least a semblance of neutrality here?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Right on, Ryann!

A few centuries ago we were selling (marrying) off our youngest daughters for land and cattle. Or declaring them witches (I know I keep harping on that, but it's my home state.)

What other views were expressed at this seminar, besides the usual hot-button rantings of dipsticks?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Ryann, people like you are the reason our country is in the shitter. Every human being can decipher between good and evil....Its wrong..there is such a thing between right and wrong..take your neutrality and shove it up your ass.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"What other views were expressed at this seminar, besides the usual hot-button rantings of dipsticks?"

I believe the next topic under discussion was about why Argentinians are so morally and socially corrupt!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I wouldn't dismiss the significance of the judge's ruling. Sharia law is not a monolithic book of rules and regulations that are codified and enforced like domestic law. It's a myriad collection of fatwas and opinions expressed by imams, sheiks, and yes, even judges, all of whom can have overlapping roles in the case of many Muslim countries. So while it can be said that this is just "some judge" who made this decree, it does carry considerably more influence than a local district court or provincial judge in western countries, as there is no rule of law to speak of. Within Sharia law, the opinion of a single perceived authority figure, especially from Saudia Arabia, propagates to other circles of influence, often without question.

Also, I fail to see how people can mix in elements of both moral relativism and absolutism in one thought. By saying that one culture is no better than another, then that would imply that not only are all cultures are able to exist without external influence and/or criticism, but also that what is considered right in one culture can be carried over to others without question, as all cultures are equal. At the same time, the same person infers judgment on their own culture to be poor because it doesn't meet the expectations of an absolute standard of morality. This seems logically incongruous.

In this case, by saying that this is acceptable in Saudi culture simply because it's their culture, what's the moral impedance for it to not be accepted in non-Muslim countries? By not criticizing it, we accept it, no? Also, we can't be respectful of a culture and yet still criticize? Honestly, I just viewed this piece as a "well, that's odd" article, but if it's going to be taken as "hot-button ranting", then the prophecy fulfills itself.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I just think Ryann can't help thinking that way. After all, she's only a product of her environment, and as such, can only have the limited viewpoint of that environment.

It's only been 90 years since women got the vote, after all. That's not even a whole century, yet. Hardly enough time for anything significant to happen in the world.

I didn't take this article as a "there they go again, those wacky Saudis", but merely as another example where women are treated like dirt in a culture that doesn't mind doing so.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
just wanted to point out that the 8 yr old kid that was engaged is now free of it.

someone turned over the ruling. read that on yahoo news or something.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"The Islamic Arabic culture has a very different history than we do, we cannot presume to judge."

Right. So if they had slavery you wouldn't allow yourself to say that that was wrong cause that's there culture and it used to be legal in the US. Brilliant.

I judge. Beating women is bad. People who justify it are schmucks.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 26 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Saudi Judge: Slapping a Spendthrift Wife is OK"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More