<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Things Science Fiction Got Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:59:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eded</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1793557</link>
		<dc:creator>eded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1793557</guid>
		<description>Every one of these entries is wrong, in some degree. Verne was not the first writer  to imagine a voyage to another world by some mechanical means, Asimov was not the first to write about mechanical humanoid robots, Huxley was not the first person to think of duplicating people, the internet was written about long before brunner and gibson, Brin was generations late in predicting hyperlinks and WWW, the entry on webcams is nonsense because it contains no specific information, Heinlein did not invent the waterbed, nor is the reference cited by him even his earliest, Clarke was not the first to think of comm satellites (although he did think of the idea of geostationary satellite networks), clarke was not the first to describe space tourists, and microsurgical instruments were correctly described by another sf writer long before fantastic voyage.  I like your blog, but don&#039;t waste everyone&#039;s time printing this poorly researched crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every one of these entries is wrong, in some degree. Verne was not the first writer  to imagine a voyage to another world by some mechanical means, Asimov was not the first to write about mechanical humanoid robots, Huxley was not the first person to think of duplicating people, the internet was written about long before brunner and gibson, Brin was generations late in predicting hyperlinks and WWW, the entry on webcams is nonsense because it contains no specific information, Heinlein did not invent the waterbed, nor is the reference cited by him even his earliest, Clarke was not the first to think of comm satellites (although he did think of the idea of geostationary satellite networks), clarke was not the first to describe space tourists, and microsurgical instruments were correctly described by another sf writer long before fantastic voyage.  I like your blog, but don't waste everyone's time printing this poorly researched crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adelle</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1752286</link>
		<dc:creator>Adelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1752286</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s not forget in 2001, A Space Odessy, that magical oven the ship had on it, where you could cook your food and reach in without oven mitts and gingerly take out a hot meal. 

and of course, Robert A Heinlein had a secretary in a short story whose phone rang, and she reached in her pocket and took it out...

we are IN the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let's not forget in 2001, A Space Odessy, that magical oven the ship had on it, where you could cook your food and reach in without oven mitts and gingerly take out a hot meal. </p>
<p>and of course, Robert A Heinlein had a secretary in a short story whose phone rang, and she reached in her pocket and took it out...</p>
<p>we are IN the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido Thys</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1742088</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido Thys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1742088</guid>
		<description>In Mons, Belgium, one can visit the Mundaneum (http://www.mundaneum.be/) a museum dedicated to a.o. Paul Otlet (1868-1944) who set up an encyclopedia of the universe on millions of index cards. He predicted that one day people would not read books anymore, but have some sort of screen on their desk to which they could have the appropriate index card transported by an ingenius mechanical system.
Moreover, all screens would be connected by a system of telescopes with which one would be able to browse through someone else&#039;s card system.
How&#039;s that for a precursor of the WWW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Mons, Belgium, one can visit the Mundaneum (<a href="http://www.mundaneum.be/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mundaneum.be/</a>) a museum dedicated to a.o. Paul Otlet (1868-1944) who set up an encyclopedia of the universe on millions of index cards. He predicted that one day people would not read books anymore, but have some sort of screen on their desk to which they could have the appropriate index card transported by an ingenius mechanical system.<br />
Moreover, all screens would be connected by a system of telescopes with which one would be able to browse through someone else's card system.<br />
How's that for a precursor of the WWW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1735623</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1735623</guid>
		<description>Asimov did not write Fantastic Voyage: it was an adaptation from the movie of the same title; he did, however, write Fantastic Voyage II, which was much better and more science-fictionally accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asimov did not write Fantastic Voyage: it was an adaptation from the movie of the same title; he did, however, write Fantastic Voyage II, which was much better and more science-fictionally accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abirami Sivaramakrishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1734863</link>
		<dc:creator>Abirami Sivaramakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1734863</guid>
		<description>Indian stories also have some science fiction in them. In the epic &quot;Ramayan&quot;, the antagonist Ravan is portrayed to have 10 heads. There is one instance in &quot;Mahabharat&quot; where a body torn apart sticks together again !!!  May be somone has the Indian author&#039;s list like this !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indian stories also have some science fiction in them. In the epic "Ramayan", the antagonist Ravan is portrayed to have 10 heads. There is one instance in "Mahabharat" where a body torn apart sticks together again !!!  May be somone has the Indian author's list like this !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1724086</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1724086</guid>
		<description>More Star Trek fiction come true; those colored, square, &quot;floppy disks&quot;, and, McCoys&#039; hypo that gave shots through clothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Star Trek fiction come true; those colored, square, "floppy disks", and, McCoys' hypo that gave shots through clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeomar</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1724071</link>
		<dc:creator>joeomar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1724071</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little inaccurate to say Arthur C Clarke &quot;predicted&quot; communication satellites.  The concept of geostationary satellites existed prior to Clarke.  However, Clarke wrote a scientific paper (NOT a science fiction story) describing the use of satellites for communications.  The impact of his work on the actual development of communications satellites is a little fuzzy, but he is often credited with INVENTING them, which is certainly different from PREDICTING them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a little inaccurate to say Arthur C Clarke "predicted" communication satellites.  The concept of geostationary satellites existed prior to Clarke.  However, Clarke wrote a scientific paper (NOT a science fiction story) describing the use of satellites for communications.  The impact of his work on the actual development of communications satellites is a little fuzzy, but he is often credited with INVENTING them, which is certainly different from PREDICTING them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schend</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1717439</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1717439</guid>
		<description>Rob F: that&#039;s true, but those aren&#039;t science fiction stories, those are actual computer science talks. You could also cite Apple&#039;s Hypercard, as an example.

That said, I find the case for the web pretty week... 1989 is seriously the best that&#039;s available? There *has* to be a mention of hypertext in sci-fi before then.

(The movie Starship Troopers has one, but I&#039;m guessing that wasn&#039;t part of the source book?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob F: that's true, but those aren't science fiction stories, those are actual computer science talks. You could also cite Apple's Hypercard, as an example.</p>
<p>That said, I find the case for the web pretty week... 1989 is seriously the best that's available? There *has* to be a mention of hypertext in sci-fi before then.</p>
<p>(The movie Starship Troopers has one, but I'm guessing that wasn't part of the source book?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan.rosol</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1717202</link>
		<dc:creator>dan.rosol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1717202</guid>
		<description>do androids dream of electric sheep is a masterpiece in my mind, ive read it at least 10 times, amazing book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do androids dream of electric sheep is a masterpiece in my mind, ive read it at least 10 times, amazing book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1716895</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1716895</guid>
		<description>Isaac Asimov&#039;s sideburns have made me happy since I was a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isaac Asimov's sideburns have made me happy since I was a child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seefish3</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1716819</link>
		<dc:creator>seefish3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1716819</guid>
		<description>Wow!

And I was so sure I wasn&#039;t dyslexic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!</p>
<p>And I was so sure I wasn't dyslexic...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron F</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1716290</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1716290</guid>
		<description>WWW / hypertext has many precursors including Ted Nelson (Computer Lib / Dream Machines, 1974), and further back with Doug Englebart (60s), and Vannevar Bush&#039;s 1945 Atlantic Monthly article &quot;The Way We May Think&quot; about the Memex machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WWW / hypertext has many precursors including Ted Nelson (Computer Lib / Dream Machines, 1974), and further back with Doug Englebart (60s), and Vannevar Bush's 1945 Atlantic Monthly article "The Way We May Think" about the Memex machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1715942</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1715942</guid>
		<description>L Ron Hubbard boasted that he could invent his own religion and he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L Ron Hubbard boasted that he could invent his own religion and he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1715684</link>
		<dc:creator>Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1715684</guid>
		<description>Verne isn&#039;t credited with the concept of the submarine, he&#039;s credited with the concept of the *nuclear* submarine. 

Indeed, his fictional vessel was named after an early submarine (by Robert Fulton) called &quot;Nautilus.&quot; In return, the first nuclear submarine was named &quot;Nautilus&quot; after his fictional one.

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Thousand_Leagues_Under_the_Sea#Allusions.2Freferences_to_actual_history.2C_geography.2C_and_current_science</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verne isn't credited with the concept of the submarine, he's credited with the concept of the *nuclear* submarine. </p>
<p>Indeed, his fictional vessel was named after an early submarine (by Robert Fulton) called "Nautilus." In return, the first nuclear submarine was named "Nautilus" after his fictional one.</p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Thousand_Leagues_Under_the_Sea#Allusions.2Freferences_to_actual_history.2C_geography.2C_and_current_science" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Thousand_Leagues_Under_the_Sea#All usions.2Freferences_to_actual_history.2C_geography.2C_and_current_scie nce</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FortyTwo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1715044</link>
		<dc:creator>FortyTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1715044</guid>
		<description>Orwell&#039;s Nineteen Eighty-Four is eerily reminiscent of the British CCTV culture of today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four is eerily reminiscent of the British CCTV culture of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714985</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714985</guid>
		<description>Guybrush, I had the same thought when I saw that picture of Heinlein. I wonder if it&#039;s more than just coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guybrush, I had the same thought when I saw that picture of Heinlein. I wonder if it's more than just coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rho</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714895</link>
		<dc:creator>Rho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714895</guid>
		<description>Murray Leinster predicted the internet far before, in his story &quot;A Logic Named Joe&quot; published in 1945. A very funny science fiction tale by the way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Logic_Named_Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murray Leinster predicted the internet far before, in his story "A Logic Named Joe" published in 1945. A very funny science fiction tale by the way.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Logic_Named_Joe" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Logic_Named_Joe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkerz</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714893</link>
		<dc:creator>monkerz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714893</guid>
		<description>#4 The Internet states- &quot;most famously, computer viruses and worms - the terminology for these, in fact, comes from Brunner&#039;s book.&quot;
 Brunner&#039;s book came out in 1975. In the 1973 film &quot;West World&quot; author Michael Critchton clearly mentions a virus like problem affecting the computer systems. So sorry, Brunner did not coin the term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 The Internet states- "most famously, computer viruses and worms - the terminology for these, in fact, comes from Brunner's book."<br />
 Brunner's book came out in 1975. In the 1973 film "West World" author Michael Critchton clearly mentions a virus like problem affecting the computer systems. So sorry, Brunner did not coin the term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714806</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714806</guid>
		<description>In Between Planets, in 1951, Heinlein had his characters using personal cell-like telephones in a casual, everyday fashion, throughout the book.  Just another feature of the near future, the kind of thing he did so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Between Planets, in 1951, Heinlein had his characters using personal cell-like telephones in a casual, everyday fashion, throughout the book.  Just another feature of the near future, the kind of thing he did so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon E. Dreyer</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714683</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon E. Dreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714683</guid>
		<description>Hadn&#039;t heard of Uncle John&#039;s Bathroom Reader plunges into the Universe until now. I&#039;ll have to get a copy for my bathroom. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hadn't heard of Uncle John's Bathroom Reader plunges into the Universe until now. I'll have to get a copy for my bathroom. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADM</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714624</link>
		<dc:creator>ADM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714624</guid>
		<description>Douglas Adams could get credit for predicting portable devices that connect to a ubiquitous wireless information network.

And Ford Prefect is a hacker, though Adams never specifically called him that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas Adams could get credit for predicting portable devices that connect to a ubiquitous wireless information network.</p>
<p>And Ford Prefect is a hacker, though Adams never specifically called him that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714488</link>
		<dc:creator>angstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714488</guid>
		<description>In &quot;Do Androids dream of electric sheep?&quot;
Deckard is not saving up for an electric sheep, in fact he already has one that he is pretending is a real sheep. In that novel all real animals have high status value due to being very nearly wiped out.
Deckard&#039;s fake sheep is a source of great shame to him.

Deckard dreams of having a real sheep, hence the title of the book. You see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In "Do Androids dream of electric sheep?"<br />
Deckard is not saving up for an electric sheep, in fact he already has one that he is pretending is a real sheep. In that novel all real animals have high status value due to being very nearly wiped out.<br />
Deckard's fake sheep is a source of great shame to him.</p>
<p>Deckard dreams of having a real sheep, hence the title of the book. You see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony LaRocca</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony LaRocca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714428</guid>
		<description>How about cell phones, remeniscent of Star Trek communicators?  Or hand-held internet devices (that can connect to google and wikipedia amongst other things) that remind me of The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about cell phones, remeniscent of Star Trek communicators?  Or hand-held internet devices (that can connect to google and wikipedia amongst other things) that remind me of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larfin Jackarse</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714403</link>
		<dc:creator>Larfin Jackarse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714403</guid>
		<description>I thought HG Wells had the Internet with the &#039;world wide brain&#039;.

I know he predicted the time machine of which, sadly, I am not allowed to detail in this time era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought HG Wells had the Internet with the 'world wide brain'.</p>
<p>I know he predicted the time machine of which, sadly, I am not allowed to detail in this time era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guybrush Threepwood</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714246</link>
		<dc:creator>Guybrush Threepwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714246</guid>
		<description>Robert Heinlein looks like Lost&#039;s John Locke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Heinlein looks like Lost's John Locke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evilbeagle</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1714114</link>
		<dc:creator>Evilbeagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 10:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1714114</guid>
		<description>Fascinating post. I love these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating post. I love these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda Vink</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1713959</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 10:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1713959</guid>
		<description>seefish3, the book is indeed called &#039;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep&#039;. The book takes place in a world where most animals have become extinct which is why electric recreations of animals (like sheep) have become popular. This is one of the things that set humans apart from androids. Humans feel empathy for animals, androids don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seefish3, the book is indeed called 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep'. The book takes place in a world where most animals have become extinct which is why electric recreations of animals (like sheep) have become popular. This is one of the things that set humans apart from androids. Humans feel empathy for animals, androids don't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1713848</link>
		<dc:creator>John A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1713848</guid>
		<description>Robert Heinlein may have written about waterbeds circa 1961, but he is supposed to have come up with the idea about 1939 during a long period in hospital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Heinlein may have written about waterbeds circa 1961, but he is supposed to have come up with the idea about 1939 during a long period in hospital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seefish3</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1713645</link>
		<dc:creator>seefish3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1713645</guid>
		<description>Oh, for Christ&#039;s sake !

It&#039;s &quot;Do Androids Dream of Electric SLEEP&quot; and it had nothing to do with sheep.

Are you high or sumthin&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, for Christ's sake !</p>
<p>It's "Do Androids Dream of Electric SLEEP" and it had nothing to do with sheep.</p>
<p>Are you high or sumthin'?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/05/10-things-science-fiction-got-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1713545</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24107#comment-1713545</guid>
		<description>Cool, I liked the robot article. Great insight to the future of robots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I liked the robot article. Great insight to the future of robots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/36 queries in 0.024 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 09:01:24 -->