<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Simpsons Stamps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1720361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1720361</guid>
		<description>I like the cartoon but it is totally wrong to put them on a US postage stamp.  And the peel and stick kind produce a mountain of trash so are not environmentally friendly.  Lets go back to proper designs and no trash attached to our stamps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the cartoon but it is totally wrong to put them on a US postage stamp.  And the peel and stick kind produce a mountain of trash so are not environmentally friendly.  Lets go back to proper designs and no trash attached to our stamps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1643727</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1643727</guid>
		<description>Simpsons is too busy recycling itself to bother with genuine humour.
Family Guy sucks.
Just ask Eric Cartman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simpsons is too busy recycling itself to bother with genuine humour.<br />
Family Guy sucks.<br />
Just ask Eric Cartman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1641329</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1641329</guid>
		<description>@Miss Cellania - that was my thought except the line is so small, and recreating whats under it would be easy.  So I thought there must be a better/other reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miss Cellania &#8211; that was my thought except the line is so small, and recreating whats under it would be easy.  So I thought there must be a better/other reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMamaJama</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639508</link>
		<dc:creator>DaMamaJama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639508</guid>
		<description>FG = Family Guy, and other than a few gems (stewie&#039;s recent &quot;Everything I Do&quot; music video), FG is just about as unfunny as the Simpsons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FG = Family Guy, and other than a few gems (stewie&#8217;s recent &#8220;Everything I Do&#8221; music video), FG is just about as unfunny as the Simpsons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639483</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639483</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s FG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s FG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639426</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639426</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s surreal to actually be completely, totally tired of these faces- and to think there was once a time when such a despiser of pop culture as myself wouldn&#039;t paste such &#039;stamp-vertisements&#039; with the slightest shame. Regrettably, it&#039;s now an exercise in cocktail party thought-provocation to argue that Simpsons was once so ingeniously cutting-edge* that it stood as the only excuse for TV set signal reception. He should have bowed out with honor and actual humor with BEHIND THE LAUGHTER, which I doubt I&#039;m alone in considering the true finale. But then MG always was a particularly contemptible douche.

*cutting-edge, not in the lazy, vulgar way with which FG now has Simpsons beat as the funnier show by far. The early-90s Simpsons would never rest its appeal on mere grossness parcel-pushing, let alone the shameless, relentless FG device of cutting away every 30 seconds with &quot;like that time when [...].&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s surreal to actually be completely, totally tired of these faces- and to think there was once a time when such a despiser of pop culture as myself wouldn&#8217;t paste such &#8216;stamp-vertisements&#8217; with the slightest shame. Regrettably, it&#8217;s now an exercise in cocktail party thought-provocation to argue that Simpsons was once so ingeniously cutting-edge* that it stood as the only excuse for TV set signal reception. He should have bowed out with honor and actual humor with BEHIND THE LAUGHTER, which I doubt I&#8217;m alone in considering the true finale. But then MG always was a particularly contemptible douche.</p>
<p>*cutting-edge, not in the lazy, vulgar way with which FG now has Simpsons beat as the funnier show by far. The early-90s Simpsons would never rest its appeal on mere grossness parcel-pushing, let alone the shameless, relentless FG device of cutting away every 30 seconds with &#8220;like that time when [...].&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgaicun</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639398</link>
		<dc:creator>dgaicun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639398</guid>
		<description>&quot;Artwork for the images was done by the cartoon&#039;s creator Matt Groening...&quot;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7975925.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Artwork for the images was done by the cartoon&#8217;s creator Matt Groening&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7975925.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7975925.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgaicun</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639394</link>
		<dc:creator>dgaicun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639394</guid>
		<description>&quot;More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.&quot;

Actually they look funner, more whimsical and expressive than the regular cartoon. I wish the show looked more like the  stamps. I will bet you anything Groening himself is the artist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually they look funner, more whimsical and expressive than the regular cartoon. I wish the show looked more like the  stamps. I will bet you anything Groening himself is the artist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636784</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636784</guid>
		<description>DOJ, I believe that is so no one will print these pictures out and glue them to a letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOJ, I believe that is so no one will print these pictures out and glue them to a letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636758</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636758</guid>
		<description>why&#039;s the 44 crossed out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why&#8217;s the 44 crossed out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrPumpernickel</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636708</link>
		<dc:creator>MrPumpernickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636708</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t really look like first season drawings, they at least had uniform line widths back then, just like they do now. More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t really look like first season drawings, they at least had uniform line widths back then, just like they do now. More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emill</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636701</link>
		<dc:creator>Emill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636701</guid>
		<description>They look like first season drawings. When the simpsons were really dysfunctional. Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look like first season drawings. When the simpsons were really dysfunctional. Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uh huh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636656</link>
		<dc:creator>uh huh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636656</guid>
		<description>i love maggie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love maggie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ollirudi</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636571</link>
		<dc:creator>ollirudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636571</guid>
		<description>Those look charmingly off-model compared to the streamlined versions we&#039;ve become accustomed to, were they drawn by Groening himself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those look charmingly off-model compared to the streamlined versions we&#8217;ve become accustomed to, were they drawn by Groening himself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:51:33 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1221 seconds -->
