<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Simpsons Stamps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:34:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1720361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1720361</guid>
		<description>I like the cartoon but it is totally wrong to put them on a US postage stamp.  And the peel and stick kind produce a mountain of trash so are not environmentally friendly.  Lets go back to proper designs and no trash attached to our stamps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the cartoon but it is totally wrong to put them on a US postage stamp.  And the peel and stick kind produce a mountain of trash so are not environmentally friendly.  Lets go back to proper designs and no trash attached to our stamps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1643727</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1643727</guid>
		<description>Simpsons is too busy recycling itself to bother with genuine humour.
Family Guy sucks.
Just ask Eric Cartman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simpsons is too busy recycling itself to bother with genuine humour.<br />
Family Guy sucks.<br />
Just ask Eric Cartman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1641329</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1641329</guid>
		<description>@Miss Cellania - that was my thought except the line is so small, and recreating whats under it would be easy.  So I thought there must be a better/other reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miss Cellania - that was my thought except the line is so small, and recreating whats under it would be easy.  So I thought there must be a better/other reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMamaJama</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639508</link>
		<dc:creator>DaMamaJama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639508</guid>
		<description>FG = Family Guy, and other than a few gems (stewie&#039;s recent &quot;Everything I Do&quot; music video), FG is just about as unfunny as the Simpsons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FG = Family Guy, and other than a few gems (stewie's recent "Everything I Do" music video), FG is just about as unfunny as the Simpsons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639483</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639483</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s FG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's FG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639426</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639426</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s surreal to actually be completely, totally tired of these faces- and to think there was once a time when such a despiser of pop culture as myself wouldn&#039;t paste such &#039;stamp-vertisements&#039; with the slightest shame. Regrettably, it&#039;s now an exercise in cocktail party thought-provocation to argue that Simpsons was once so ingeniously cutting-edge* that it stood as the only excuse for TV set signal reception. He should have bowed out with honor and actual humor with BEHIND THE LAUGHTER, which I doubt I&#039;m alone in considering the true finale. But then MG always was a particularly contemptible douche.

*cutting-edge, not in the lazy, vulgar way with which FG now has Simpsons beat as the funnier show by far. The early-90s Simpsons would never rest its appeal on mere grossness parcel-pushing, let alone the shameless, relentless FG device of cutting away every 30 seconds with &quot;like that time when [...].&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's surreal to actually be completely, totally tired of these faces- and to think there was once a time when such a despiser of pop culture as myself wouldn't paste such 'stamp-vertisements' with the slightest shame. Regrettably, it's now an exercise in cocktail party thought-provocation to argue that Simpsons was once so ingeniously cutting-edge* that it stood as the only excuse for TV set signal reception. He should have bowed out with honor and actual humor with BEHIND THE LAUGHTER, which I doubt I'm alone in considering the true finale. But then MG always was a particularly contemptible douche.</p>
<p>*cutting-edge, not in the lazy, vulgar way with which FG now has Simpsons beat as the funnier show by far. The early-90s Simpsons would never rest its appeal on mere grossness parcel-pushing, let alone the shameless, relentless FG device of cutting away every 30 seconds with "like that time when [...]."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgaicun</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639398</link>
		<dc:creator>dgaicun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639398</guid>
		<description>&quot;Artwork for the images was done by the cartoon&#039;s creator Matt Groening...&quot;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7975925.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Artwork for the images was done by the cartoon's creator Matt Groening..."</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7975925.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7975925.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgaicun</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1639394</link>
		<dc:creator>dgaicun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1639394</guid>
		<description>&quot;More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.&quot;

Actually they look funner, more whimsical and expressive than the regular cartoon. I wish the show looked more like the  stamps. I will bet you anything Groening himself is the artist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick."</p>
<p>Actually they look funner, more whimsical and expressive than the regular cartoon. I wish the show looked more like the  stamps. I will bet you anything Groening himself is the artist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636784</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636784</guid>
		<description>DOJ, I believe that is so no one will print these pictures out and glue them to a letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOJ, I believe that is so no one will print these pictures out and glue them to a letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636758</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636758</guid>
		<description>why&#039;s the 44 crossed out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why's the 44 crossed out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrPumpernickel</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636708</link>
		<dc:creator>MrPumpernickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636708</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t really look like first season drawings, they at least had uniform line widths back then, just like they do now. More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn't really look like first season drawings, they at least had uniform line widths back then, just like they do now. More than anything these look like they were drawn by a complete hack, or a three year old, take your pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emill</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636701</link>
		<dc:creator>Emill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636701</guid>
		<description>They look like first season drawings. When the simpsons were really dysfunctional. Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look like first season drawings. When the simpsons were really dysfunctional. Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uh huh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636656</link>
		<dc:creator>uh huh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636656</guid>
		<description>i love maggie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love maggie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ollirudi</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/10/the-simpsons-stamps/comment-page-1/#comment-1636571</link>
		<dc:creator>ollirudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=23731#comment-1636571</guid>
		<description>Those look charmingly off-model compared to the streamlined versions we&#039;ve become accustomed to, were they drawn by Groening himself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those look charmingly off-model compared to the streamlined versions we've become accustomed to, were they drawn by Groening himself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/20 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 12:37:09 -->