Comments on: MLK Assassination Aftermath

By: Anon

Anon — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 02:26:02 +0000

While I still believe that Martin Luther King was a good man, I have to admit that the bias of mainstream media has me now in doubt. Were they lying to us all along, as they are lying to us today?

By: skidworth

skidworth — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:06:32 +0000

sorry, the name is skidworth, not skidmark.

why are Dr. Kings FBI records sealed?
don’t believe me, ask for a FOI request for Dr. King’s birth certificate. you won’t get it….I tried!

Don’t believe all you are told about him…do you really believe Sarah Palin was that vile?

By: Kalel

Kalel — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:00:58 +0000

I think we can all agree that murder is tragic.

These stark photographs of terror, blood, grief, and the remnant minutia of a life lost all transecend political debate.

By: violet

violet — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:34:22 +0000

Alex, please don’t encourage Neil to come. The world is already full up on crazy; we’re not taking any ejaculations, I mean applications, right now.

By: Qworeit

Qworeit — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:43:49 +0000

Why did Skidworth name himself after his underwear?

By: skidworth

skidworth — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:33:16 +0000

Neil is spot-on…..don’t believe all you have been told about MLK. the truth shall set you free!

By: sad man

sad man — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:05:13 +0000

Get off neil’s case.

His p*nis obviously doesn’t work and listening to the voices in his radio/head is the only way he can get off without taking a shotgun to schoolyards.

Poor little bitty p3nis boy.

(wow are we censoring body parts but not Neil?)

By: sad man

sad man — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:03:54 +0000

Get off neil’s case.

His penis obviously doesn’t work and listening to the voices in his radio/head is the only way he can get off without taking a shotgun to schoolyards.

Poor little bitty penis boy.

By: Johnny Cat

Johnny Cat — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:39:49 +0000

Neil, you’re full of it.

By: Alex

Alex — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:33:25 +0000

Come again, Neil?

By: OhTheCosmos

OhTheCosmos — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:33:43 +0000

i really like the briefcase image. these photos are so compelling they almost seem staged, instead of candid as the photographer explains… beautifully captured either way.

By: Neil

Neil — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:13:04 +0000

Oh yeah, no censorship here (as you folks stated elsewhere this week).

By: sad man

sad man — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:53:54 +0000

These photos really piss me off until i remember that violent anger is not what Dr King would have wanted.

(righteous peaceful anger maybe but not violent)

By: Neil

Neil — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:29:07 +0000

Dang! I was hoping they’d show the hot white prostitutes he was with that night or the night before, as is well documented. Or maybe, since his family has arranged that his FBI records be permanently sealed to the public, they could shed light on his well-known (and questioned by rival civil rights activists) ploy of feigning “nonviolence” while simultaneously orchestrating the chivalrous riots that pioneered later ones by these liberated souls in LA and Cincinnati. It would have been fascinating to see some shots of him in the company of his KGB-financed communist handlers. Oops, we already have those (and of militant Marxist Rosa Parks). Best of all would be shots of him sneaking published theses of other scholars from the library for appropriation into large-scale, whole-text plagiarization of some postdoctoral thesis as he did with his first one. Come on, LIFE, get it together! lol

By: Johnny Cat

Johnny Cat — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:02:53 +0000

Those were compelling photos.

By: Kalel

Kalel — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:27:27 +0000

Very powerful images, and difficult to look at, even now.