Comments on: World's Most Expensive Jeans

By: justsomechick

justsomechick — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:43:47 +0000

holy crap. thats ridiculous.

if i had 27000 i would buy a freaking car and like ten pairs of jeans.

By: K Maliwa

K Maliwa — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:11:15 +0000

Ooh people,how many poor people are there out side,who need garments even less than $10 ,how many would u have help by one jean of DAMIEN,God doesn't care how much expensive you are,wat he's looking at iz how much your heart is cheaper to other peaple

By: Cyrano De Ventura

Cyrano De Ventura — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:12:05 +0000

So shall we all get some pottery wheels, ladders, paint and jeans and make ourselves some art? I am certain that the effort that Hirst put into those is completely worth the price tag, I mean his farts are 1,000 dollars alone. Oddly I was just reading an article about how artists like Hirst are on the road to extinction because people are beginning to consider art as something that doesn't cost a person a wheelbarrow full of money to own. It also has to do with the disillusionment of people with art galleries, that art is a tangible thing that is only real if it can be hung inside the building.

By: Neil

Neil — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:27:39 +0000

Ugh. It seems to have excised my helpful guideline because I placed it n brackets.

Here it is:

Things comprise that which they are composed of. Nothing is ever "comprised of" anything.

By: Neil

Neil — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:24:49 +0000

It's so trendy in recent years to misuse the word 'comprise' that new ways are thought up daily. Keeping in mind that the exalted, purportedly divine institution of Webster's Dictionary includes misuse of English words as definitions when such misuse surpasses proper use in frequency, here's a helpful guideline: VonSkippy- The word 'blonde' is spelled with an 'e,' This non-typo belies the unique non-based-in-reality status of the racial stereotype that persons possessed of genes that code for fair hair are unintelligent. Of course, the irony is that the statistically blondest nations have statistically the highest IQs. Sorry, it's true.

By: Noelegy

Noelegy — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:43:01 +0000

And....somebody WILL buy them.

By: JerseyMel

JerseyMel — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:42:30 +0000

Oh Frau - you totally stole my comment!

Spin Art + Wal-Mart Jeans + Paint = Set for Life.

By: Gail Pink

Gail Pink — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:57:42 +0000

Are you guys going to change "Daniel" to "Damien"?

By: Kalel

Kalel — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:11:34 +0000

Seems that Walt Disney has vomited in Hirst's lap.

By: NoNameNJ

NoNameNJ — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:00:53 +0000

And Damien probably didn't even make them himself.

By: Frau

Frau — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:33:31 +0000

Time to get the Magic Spin Art out. And dig through the rag box for some old jeans. And make me some money.

By: meg

meg — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:09:59 +0000

But...but...they're so UGLY!

By: Gail Pink

Gail Pink — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:45:29 +0000

"Two, please!"

By: pardsmith

pardsmith — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:01:52 +0000

If you think Damien Hirst's jean are expensive, check out his piece For the Love of God, it's jaw dropping. His piece The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living is really neat too, go dead animals!

By: Foreigner1

Foreigner1 — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:30:30 +0000

...How much???
I've never ever spent more than €60,- on jeans...! In fact I've never ever spent so much on anyting (aside my house), not even my car...! Even if I had that kind of money, I would use it for other things...! I'm shocked!

By: Evilbeagle

Evilbeagle — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:26:43 +0000

If I had that kind of money to throw around on clothes, it would not be on those jeans.

By: Skipweasel

Skipweasel — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:44:49 +0000

D'yer know, I'm going to have to keep "Conspicuous consumption is rarely attractive" in my clipboard in future.

By: VonSkippy

VonSkippy — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:51:55 +0000

You would have to be a complete moron (or blond) to fork over $27,000 for something that fugly.

By: Monica

Monica — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:08:03 +0000

I think that should be DAMIEN Hirst