The Scientific Basis of Teenage Laziness

Posted by Alex in Baby & Kids, Medicine on March 24, 2009 at 2:19 pm


Why are teenagers so lousy at chores? Is it laziness … or biology? Monica Luciana of University of Minnesota and colleagues have the scientific answer:

Blame it on "cognitive limitations." [Teenagers'] brains can’t multitask as well as those of the taskmasters. [...]

The part of the brain responsible for multitasking continues to develop until late adolescence, with cells making connections even after some children are old enough to drive, according to a new study in the May/June issue of the journal Child Development.

The frontal cortex, which starts just behind the eyes and goes back almost to the ears, figures out (or doesn’t) what to do when a person is asked to juggle multiple pieces of information. Imagine, then, how "make your bed and bring the laundry down" might befuddle a 13-year-old.

Link


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post

Tags: , , , ,


COMMENT

9 comments to "The Scientific Basis of Teenage Laziness"

  1. Astrochicken
    March 24th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Apparently they have never seen my daughter listen to the radio, watch YouTube, and text without looking at the phone all concurrently.

    Richardo2 from the original site said it best. Teenagers don't do chores properly because chores suck.

  2. James Tracy
    March 24th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Agreed, Astrochicken.

    Perhaps people have a tendency to neglect the things they dislike.

    Or did that not occur to anyone else?

  3. VonSkippy
    March 24th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Or maybe lazy teenagers are caused by lazy parents?

    Teenagers,like dogs, are easily trained:

    Create list of chores.
    Go over list with teenager.
    End of week - check list.
    List complete - give hug, allowance, allow entertainment privileges (i.e. cell phone, car, game console, ipod, etc).
    List incomplete - give hug (hey they're still your kid), but no allowance, no entertainment privileges, go over expectations (and rewards), encourage them to try again next week (but DO NOT REWARD lazyness).

    Of course dogs learn quicker - but teenagers eventually catch on (assuming the parents aren't lazy - then it's hopeless).

  4. chickmagnetstuff
    March 24th, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    I knew it! it wasn't my fault!!

  5. Dandy
    March 24th, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    No teenager who was allowed to help when still a child is 'lazy' about chores. Period.

    Stop your child from helping, and when older, duh, your teenager doesn't want to help...

  6. Robot
    March 25th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    I have been studying what ticks off laziness for 4 years now, and I find this study not only insulting, but utterly incorrect. I'm 17 and have been multitasking on and off the computer since I was about 7. Every teenager I know was raised pretty much the same way. We are forced to multitask with school, work, social lives, world issues, everything. Teenagers are people too, we aren't just numb to the rest of the world.
    The reason my generation doesn't get along with the previous generation is because they think we aren't as smart as them, and thats just absolutely absurd. We are lazy to issues that seem unimportant to us, like making a bed for example. Whats the goddamn point? You're just gonna sleep in it the next night and mess it up again.

    Oh, and VonSkippy, I can't wait for you to have kids. Cause they are going to be a tad messed up. Cell phones, computers, game consoles and ipods are not mere "entertainment" to children of today. They are a means to gain new information at a very rapid rate. To just take it away for not cleaning the table should be unheard of in todays technological society. What you're doing is disconnecting them from the rest of the world. Real nice parenting bud, but we aren't dogs.

  7. VonSkippy
    March 25th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    @Robot
    Thanks for proving my point. Too bad your parents passed on the dog and went directly to contributing to the downfall of the human race.

  8. Video Game Dork
    March 25th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    Yeah, this study is rather incorrect. I was actually a a MUCH better multi-tasker when I was a teen than I am now (at 30). Much like Astrochicken described.

    As for Vonskippy's comment, I found it entertaining. (although, dogs *really* don't 'learn quicker' than teens, they just have much less of an ability to ignore their 'programing'.) :)

  9. Robot
    March 25th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    I'm sorry Von.. But how is that even a rebuttal? Blaming my parents like that.. Tsk Tsk.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS