Comments on: TIME's Most Influential People of 2009: moot of 4chan?

By: Pool's Closed

Pool's Closed — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:22:42 +0000

wow David D. Davidson your post was great. I read the breaking rules 1 and 2, looked at your named and lol'd hard. +1 internets to you sir.

By: m00t

m00t — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:31:34 +0000

The Game.

By: Uloosee

Uloosee — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:33:08 +0000

The Game

By: 204209491

204209491 — Thu, 07 May 2009 04:28:16 +0000

/b/ saved Dusty the cat, which is more than any of the "important" people have done this year

By: ugajimmy

ugajimmy — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:35:53 +0000

i just HOPE that this is changed before printing because its quite an embarrassment. 4chan.org is like, kiddy porn CENTRAL. wtf?

By: Anon676569

Anon676569 — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:48:46 +0000

Domingo
the 'hacker' (just got her dox and then worked it out from the security question) was a /b/tard
4chan found him first because he was one of them

Anonymous is everywhere.

By: internet superhero

internet superhero — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:59:12 +0000

it's m00t

By: Domingo

Domingo — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:14:33 +0000

4chan has touched millions of lives, for better or for worse, gained international recognition for both good and bad. Launched a massive International Protest movement in less than a month, as well as Identified the hacker who got Palin's email before the FBI had a clue who he was.

Yea... moot is very influential

By: David Davidson

David Davidson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:53:56 +0000

Moot is influential. More so than Obama? of course not.

But 4chan is just brilliant and idiotic at the same time.

Too bad this breaks rules 1 and 2 though.

By: Ctirus

Ctirus — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:37:03 +0000

It's ironic that people claim such things as "surprising that someone from the internet got people to vote for them *yawn*". If someone got enough people to vote for them regardless of what source they used and won something like... oh I don't know... Time magazines most influential person of the year, I believe that it''s probably because they're... well... highly influential. This wasn't Time magazines vote for the years most ignorant person, other wise someone who was ignorant might have won, like Obama. Seriously though, if citizens are allowed to vote on the most influential person of the year, the person who wins obviously influenced the 3million or so people who voted for them, Moot is influential, deal with it.

By: Rageface

Rageface — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:04:16 +0000

Moot had nothing to do with the voters, they're voting on their own accord, and they wont stop voting until moot is #1. Moot doesnt ever tell his fans what to do, he basically just sits back and watches everthing happen and doesnt pay attention to what his anonymous legion is up to. If your somewhat familiar with /b/'s history you'll know theyre famous for their "raids". (also for being the root of almost all internet meme's: shoopdawhoop, lolcat, motivationals, etc.) Someone will flood the channels with something and everyone will see it and mass-whatever it is. In this case its votes. When the voting first started it was just a few simple anon's voting fairly, but then anon-talk (4chans rival) decided to raid /b/'s raid by downvoting moot and upvoting random people it just pissed /b/ off. Then time started to cheat their polls by lowering moots rank and deleting thousands of votes. So /b/'s hackers/programmers starting creating auto-voters for moot. So basically /b/ is never going to stop voting for moot, you gotta face it hes gonna be Times #1.

By: Video Game Dork

Video Game Dork — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:26:58 +0000

this argument is moot.

By: philliposophy

philliposophy — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:19:31 +0000

@Thomas, very well put sir.

By: Kath

Kath — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:20:24 +0000

4chan's memes don't come from 2chan. 2chan is in Japanese. The original 4chan site design was based on 2chan, but there's very little memetic or even conversational flow between the two sites.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:25:52 +0000

Seriously, moot doesn't self-promote. He rarely even posts to his own boards. I can't blame him. If hell lived in cyberspace, it would be /b/. Personally, I like to watch 4chan work its way into other websites. They frequently "raid" other message boards, often with hilarious (if childish and sadistic) results. After someone from 4chan broke Sarah Palin's email password, Greta Van Susteren from Fox News did a poll on her website asking if it was a harmless prank, or a dirty political attack by the left (in reality, it was neither). Needless to say, before 4chan found it, it was something like 95% for dirty political attack. By the end of her show, it was about 80% for harmless prank. I believe she declared that her website had been hacked on national TV. As raids go, that one was harmless. I've seen them get much worse. 4chan is where I go to destroy my soul. Neatorama is where I go to get it back.

By: Adam B.

Adam B. — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:17:04 +0000

hahaha. i'm sure this was just a raid on the time poll. moot's not influential, even on 4chan. i'm sure they just did this for a laugh. probably found a way to hack the voting.

By: Gauldar

Gauldar — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:39:22 +0000

Considering how much LOLcats have become an internet meme, I'm not surprised to hear this.

By: Orjan Morjan

Orjan Morjan — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:32:12 +0000

Indeed as Camilla said, this is their favorite pastime.
A funny one was when they screwed the vote on stormfront to say that 74% of them never finished high school.

By: Camilla

Camilla — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:36:13 +0000

4chan has a lot of traffic. Users often make "campaigns" inside the boards to do mass votings in polls such as these. I doubt that the people who voted for moot even think he's influential - they just wanted a prank.

By: Anne

Anne — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:06:28 +0000

@Cat Cab
lol, moot doesn't plug himself on the site. Learn2internet.

By: JeffConn

JeffConn — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:02:59 +0000

You think that Time would learn about online voting. When Time did a Man of the Century poll, the top 2 vote-getters were Hank the Angry Drunk Dwarf and Ric Flair.

By: Wok

Wok — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:32:48 +0000

Oh god, 4chan.

The infamous.

By: Cat Cab

Cat Cab — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:16:43 +0000

I just think that moot used the thousands of 4channers to vote for him, look at the votes difference

By: Theophrastus

Theophrastus — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:21:00 +0000

As one commenter said, "omg a guy from the internets with lots of users on his site does well on the internets who would have thought?"

4chan is a big-traffic site, but it's not influential, just an aggregator. And moot rarely comes up when he's not being spoofed or mocked.

By: Shen

Shen — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:10:31 +0000

well, that is certainly strange... even if most of these iternet memes started on 2chan

By: Max Average

Max Average — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:09:54 +0000

I can haz influents???

By: parahaps

parahaps — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:08:47 +0000

I won't deny on that 4chan has had some influence over the years, but I think that in the non-4chan world it's been pretty irrelevant thus far this year.

By: eni

eni — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:05:17 +0000

I am speechless. Congrats, moot.
However, I feel like 4chan would have been a good candidate in 2008. 2009 I'm not so sure about yet.

By: philliposophy

philliposophy — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:30:38 +0000

Con: 4chan is the butthole of the internet.
Pro: Buttholes are where farts come from and those are pretty funny.