<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hidden Tap Faucet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/comment-page-1/#comment-1566010</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/#comment-1566010</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s neat, only it looks like it would be a pain to clean calcium build up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s neat, only it looks like it would be a pain to clean calcium build up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake D.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/comment-page-1/#comment-1565107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/#comment-1565107</guid>
		<description>THE FUTURE IS NOW!!!!!!!!


But in all seriousness... I think that&#039;s a really fantastic idea and I don&#039;t doubt some businesses will be installing that in their restrooms. But I agree with Josh, I was expecting him to stick out his other hand and then there would be two streams. I bet it wouldn&#039;t be that hard to create. Perhaps they can add that eventually?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE FUTURE IS NOW!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>But in all seriousness&#8230; I think that&#8217;s a really fantastic idea and I don&#8217;t doubt some businesses will be installing that in their restrooms. But I agree with Josh, I was expecting him to stick out his other hand and then there would be two streams. I bet it wouldn&#8217;t be that hard to create. Perhaps they can add that eventually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/comment-page-1/#comment-1564715</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/#comment-1564715</guid>
		<description>It would only been cool if he put out his other hand and another stream of water came out. A sink that wide is pointless unless it can accommodate two spickets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would only been cool if he put out his other hand and another stream of water came out. A sink that wide is pointless unless it can accommodate two spickets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/comment-page-1/#comment-1564673</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/14/hidden-tap-faucet/#comment-1564673</guid>
		<description>Cool! But it would never go over in my neck of the woods, where the power supply is not all that consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! But it would never go over in my neck of the woods, where the power supply is not all that consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:48:24 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0959 seconds -->
