Is This What Shakespeare Looked Like?

Posted by Miss Cellania in Arts & Crafts on March 10, 2009 at 10:13 am


A recently identified portrait of William Shakespeare, if genuine, would be the only true likeness we have of The Bard. The popular face of Shakespeare that we know was taken from a woodcut by Martin Droeshout that was published after the playwright’s death. The newly-identified portrait was painted around 1610, when Shakespeare was 46 years old. The painting has been in the hands of the Cobbe family for centuries. Current owner Alec Cobbe saw another portrait that supposedly depicted Shakespeare and saw a resemblance. He then asked Stanley Wells of Birmingham University to help authenticate it.

The two men arranged to have the Cobbe painting subjected to a battery of scientific tests — tree-ring-dating to determine the age of the wood panel, X-ray examination at the Hamilton-Kerr Institute at Cambridge University and infrared reflectography. The tests produced convincing evidence that the panel dated from around 1610 and was the source for the Folger painting, among others. Wells is now sure of it. “I don’t think anyone who sees [the Cobbe painting] would doubt this is the original,” he says. “It’s a much livelier painting, a much more alert face, a more intelligent and sympathetic face.”

Link -via Metafilter


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post

Tags: , ,


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:
BuckyBalls (w/ Mystery Bonus!)


COMMENT

8 comments to "Is This What Shakespeare Looked Like?"

  1. dash
    March 10th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    What about the Sanders portrait?
    http://www.uoguelph.ca/atguelph/06-05-03/
    It was billed as a true portrait as well.

  2. Kalel
    March 10th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    "Your face, my thane, is as a book where men
    May read strange matters..."

  3. xultar
    March 10th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    My Gaydar just went off. Welcome to the Gayborhood!

    And for those who are asking, I'm a gay man trapped in a woman's body.

  4. Johnny Cat
    March 10th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    It kinda does look like Joseph Fiennes.

  5. Minnesotastan
    March 10th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    No. THIS is what Shakespeare looked like -

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Edward-de-Vere-1575.jpg

  6. Alex
    March 10th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    I would so find that collar itchy ... I guess I'm just not built to live in that era.

  7. Quasi_Mojo
    March 10th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    I, too, believe the real Shakespeare was Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford.

    http://ezinearticles.com/?Who-Was-the-Real-William-Shakespeare?&id=843 099

  8. bour3
    March 10th, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    tree-ring-dating to determine the age of the wood panel

    Tree ring dating would reveal the age of the tree at the time the tree was cut down to make the panel. Or not. It would not reveal how long ago that happened. Carbon dating would. And tree ring comparison with known samples from the same species during the same period from the same specific area could might possibly sort of sometimes be helpful.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS