Webcam "Angel" in a Cozumel Scuba Club

Posted by Alex in Paranormal, Pictures, Travel & Places on March 9, 2009 at 2:42 pm


Neatorama reader Nick Schwartz sent us this intriguing account of an "angel" captured on a webcam from a scuba club in Cozumel, Mexico:

"One of my bookmarks is a scuba club in Cozumel – which I have never been, but I’m from Buffalo, NY and its nice to see something tropical once in a while. So point of all this being, I opened the app and saw what looks to be an angelic figure walking through the scuba club. I don’t have any program to zoom in on this image but it’s certainly something interesting. Some say angel. Some say a bunch of coincidences coming together at the moment I opened it. "

… and soon after, the "angel" was gone:

What do you think? Is it an angel or just Buzz Lightyear showing up for a little night dive? Thanks Nick!


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post

Tags: , , , ,


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:


COMMENT

53 comments to "Webcam "Angel" in a Cozumel Scuba Club"

  1. Gauldar
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Hmm, I just had a thought. Are ghost and angel sightings at tourist locations the first form of viral marketing?

  2. Reithe
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Well, it kinda looks like a guy wearing white carrying chairs to a pavilion.

  3. Eric the Red
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    This post almost made me cancel my neatorama feed.

  4. Alex
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    Aw, you guys have no sense of humor ...

  5. Christopher
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    Seriously, This is kinda stupid Neatorama. I guess all your other stuff makes up for it though.

  6. boo
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    i was thinking round cocktail tables as opposed to chairs, but yeah - think that's the right track

  7. God
    March 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    It was probably an angel. I can tell from quite a few of the pixels and from seeing quite a few angels in my time.

  8. bobbynotick
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    I zoomed in and used some sharpening filters and giggled a bit.

    Its a man (dressed in white) carrying two plastic tables and putting them on his head for stability. The tables are top-to-top with each of them having their legs outwards. Obviously club staff (hence the white overalls) clearing up tables for the night. He is moving towards the camera, and the low resolution shot blurs because of this.

  9. SenorMysterioso
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    Some guy carrying tables on his head, top to top like bobby said with four legs pointing down and four pointing up

  10. SweetMonkeyCreek
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    It's the end times! Only those who can still afford to go on Mexican Scuba Vacations will be saved! REPENT!

  11. Talula
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Way to go, bobbynotick. I was gonna call Photoshopped.

  12. Johnny Cat
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    It's clearly Keyser Soze.

  13. Sammy
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    You can read in the top left that the pictures are taken 15 minutes apart from each other. Plenty of time for anyone to walk through

  14. AJ
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    Check your mythology. That's a downright lazy angel. He's supposed to be flying.

  15. Karen Sugarpants
    March 9th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Seriously Neatorama? SO obvious it's what bobby said. Funny though, it made me click thru.

  16. Rottenartist
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    How very disappointing.

    Leave that credulous stuff to YouTube ghost sightings.

    Love the blog, but this is not cool.

  17. Jen Diggity
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    What a bunch of whiners.

  18. caitlin13
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Calm down people. It's not that bad. If you'd cancel your feed because of this I'd be glad to see you go.

  19. Yum-Yum
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    It's obviously Dr. Manhattan's circulatory system.

  20. dd
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    man, I was hoping to come to the comments and see where to view this feed! I'm in Minneapolis - a little tropical love wouldn't hurt, you know?

  21. just a guy
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    cancel your feed / stop visiting because of one silly post? Isn't that sort of a childish reaction - throwing a fit?

    anyhow, (specifically @ Taluta) not all hoaxes have to be photoshoped. It could in fact be a person dressed weird on purpose, and got in front of the camera.

    but in this case it seems bobbynotick was on the ball. :P

  22. Cluck
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    "and soon after, the "angel" was gone"

    A little over 15 mins and 900 exposures the object is gone.

  23. Josh
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    I agree after some editing it looks like a guy carrying a table.

    The ghost effect can easily be explained by night time over exposure in the light since he is moving.

  24. Woogie
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    15 seconds between shows. Disappearance is easily explained there. And yeah, guy carrying chairs or tables. DUH!

  25. Brent
    March 9th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    Looks kind of like EVA-01 from Evangelion.

    http://www.almostsmart.com/upload/files/2004/Jan/Neon%20Genesis%20Evan gelion%20-%20Eva%2001%20Night%20Fire.jpg

  26. ted
    March 9th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Sad thing is some incredulous spazz is going to believe this.

  27. ChuckBlack
    March 9th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    Isn't that the guy from that Spiderman movie?

  28. Adam D. Jones
    March 9th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    I hope the casual observers notice there is a 15 second window between the two shots, enough time to my grandmother to walk through and get out of sight.

  29. Dude
    March 9th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    Photoshop.

  30. B1ueGuy
    March 9th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    Slow day on Neatorama? I'm more inclined to sightings of Cheesus, or the virgin mary in a rusty sink. Depressing, really.

  31. darkrebirth
    March 9th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    15 minutes has passed... of course it's gone.

  32. Jackie
    March 9th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    It's water or a fountain of some kind that has been edited out of the second photo. Nice try. : )

  33. Caitlin
    March 9th, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    whack.

  34. Johnny Cat
    March 9th, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    Way to fail, Jackie. Scroll up to bobbynotick's comment. :)

  35. Laurie G.
    March 9th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    it's a guy carrying a chair down the sidewalk...

  36. Frau
    March 9th, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    OMG!!! It is a talking beaver from the side of the road, dressed in bacon, carrying two table tops to an unattended highway sign that he has reprogrammed to read "zombies ahead." Anyone can see that. Geeez.

  37. FIG
    March 9th, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    ahahahah

  38. KGS
    March 9th, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    If you look really close even on the posted picture here you can see his face through the clear plastic table. The tables are top to top with one set of legs pointing up, the other going behind his neck.
    In fact it's quite obvious a guy carrying tables just from the posted pic, just look at it close up, his shoes stand out too

  39. Johnny Cat
    March 9th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    LMAO at Frau.

  40. Ned
    March 9th, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    I still think it's a real angel.

  41. samuel
    March 9th, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    It is a person with two tables on his back walking away.

  42. Dave
    March 10th, 2009 at 12:02 am

    Now, come on; if it were an angel, he'd be putting those wings to use, doncha think?

    And what's with all the bile spewed over this post? What if the image captured some guy walking on tip-toe, wearing black or red with something looking like horns sticking out his head? Spirituality is only ok to discuss if it's from the dark side?

  43. babyhip
    March 10th, 2009 at 5:18 am

    why do people get so upset when the content of Neatorama isn't exactly what they believe it should be? there are a lot of things on this blog that i don't care to read but i don't get mad or even take the time to post a comment about how it's wrong of Neatorama to post such tripe. get over yourselves, or at the very least, scroll down and read on.

  44. edc
    March 10th, 2009 at 11:44 am

    at first thought "its an eva!"
    second thought "its a guy moving a table"
    third thought "there are some really dumb commenters here" [eric, karen, cluck]

  45. Lexi
    March 10th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    Well since the time difference between the two exposures is about 15 mins, I'm going to say it was someone in a costume who walked down that pathway.

  46. Ajan
    March 10th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Angel??
    If that's no angel...

    What's this supposed to mean?
    http://abstractpsyche.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/enlightment/

  47. SenorMysterioso
    March 10th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    Why did so many people get upset about this? Alex seemed to be joking and others simply pointed out what the photo actually is but I dont understand the outrage that some people had about an "angel"

  48. Thebes
    March 10th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    Clearly two tables being carried by a man in white. What sort of nutter sees an "angel" here?

  49. dani
    March 10th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    it was gone... FIFTEEN MINUTES after.

  50. wpdunn71901
    March 11th, 2009 at 8:29 am

    SenorMysterioso
    March 10th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
    said:
    "Why did so many people get upset about this? Alex seemed to be joking and others simply pointed out what the photo actually is but I dont understand the outrage that some people had about an “angel”"

    Because it's "Hip and Edgy" to be anti-religious on today's innertubes by spoiled secular libtards
    perhaps if it was a pic of the Obamessiah they would be inclined to wax rhapsodic about the orgasms it induced

  51. violet
    March 11th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    @wpdunn: Great save! This post almost didn't contain a completely irrelevant and irrational political non sequitur!

  52. master
    May 12th, 2009 at 4:31 am

    15 minutes is a long time to say "… and soon after, the "angel" was gone"

    I support the theory that it is a man moving a table.
    Did you notice the lights (on the right hand side) are on when the man is out but as soon as he has finished his job he goes in and switches off the lights.

    Or were the lights left on for the Angel ?

  53. toni
    May 27th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    Its sad to see so many skeptics online. If the author believes is an angel then let him/her believe it is. There is no need to discredit someone because their beliefs and your logic doesn't coinside that's the beauty of faith. Everything isn't always backed by evidence


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS