I didn’t say nobody was murdered. Millions passed through those prisons. Murders happen in cities that large, certainly in prisons that large. My contention is that nobody was gassed. Stacks upon stacks of corpses, and they all happened to die of gassing? Funny, because they sure look uniformly emaciated to me. Emaciation accompanies /starvation./

Do you mean to imply that there were dozens of gas chambers? That’s news to me. Please name them, because this is a major development in the one truly forbidden debate with literally *trillions* of dollars and the fate of a powerful nuclear state at stake.

The “Nazis” weren’t damned at Nürnberg by gas chambers, they were damned by a process referred to by Robert Taft as “Victor’s justice” in “violation of the most basic principles of American justice and internationally accepted standards of justice,” to the applause of US president John F. Kennedy.

I’m not going to invite you to STFD or STFU, I’d rather you simply obliged my questions. I’ll check back in three months.

If you’re going to spout b******t, make it accurate. Anne Frank died in Belsen-Bergen, not Auschwitz. Zylon-B was developed by the Bayer Corp. The scientist who invented it acknowledged it was used in Germany on human beings. Given the HUGE amount of bodies found in all the concentration camps, how can you say no one was murdered or gassed? Stacks upon stacks of corpses (most of them Jewish) and they all happened to die of disease?

Perhaps there were gas chamber mock-ups found at Auschwitz, I don’t know. What about all the other concentration camps? There were dozens. You want the world to believe all those gas chambers were mock-ups? Dayum, you Nazis are some clever dudes to mock-up the very evidence that damned you at the trials at Nuremburg.

STFD & STFU

Banning Books is really scarey. I wonder if people know how scarey (dangerous) it is.

Happy Face,

so i believe they were afraid of an uproar in laborer class

or..well.. something like that.. It’s an educated guess at best

Feeling progressive in hindsight isn’t all that difficult. Who else is pushing today’s envelope?

However, these books do challenge with devastating effect the notion that the Germans systematically murdered people, specifically with poison gas. Anne Frank died at Auschwitz from Typhus, transmitted by lice. In an effort to combat louse-borne Typhus, the Germans shaved prisoners’ heads and fumigated clothing, mattresses, etc. with a product called Zyklon B. This is admitted by the modern establishment. The *real* gas chambers the Germans used for this purpose can be seen at Dachau, which is no longer alleged to be a “death camp” because critical scientists could access it during the cold war. These gas chambers are equipped with all the features of a modern penal execution chamber: steel walls, peep-holes, ventilation systems. The “gas chambers” at Auschwitz are a laughable fraud: drafty rooms. The Jewish Holocaust “denier” David Cole secured undercover footage of Auschwitz head curator F. Piper privately admitting to a fellow Jew that these “gas chambers” were post-war Soviet propaganda mock-ups, just as phony as the dozens of “holocaust” and “6 million killed” allegations leveled by New York Jews at the Germans and others BEFORE Hitler came to power (jaw-droppingly documented in THE FIRST HOLOCAUST, another *truly* BANNED book).

Thousands of other wild allegations were made, from human soap to human skin lampshades, and these have finally been admitted to be lies by the establishment. Why? Because it is so easy to simply test the artifacts. Auschwitz, however, is off-limits. This legend is the foundation stone of the state of Israel; it has financed 95+% of Israel’s state infrastructure, including its massive arsenal of nuclear weapons. It is the legend that protects the critical immunity of the west’s media barons, essentially all of whom are Jews, and where they aren’t, their content directors are. Anybody who dares cross these people is hounded from his job, shunned by his colleagues (including the cowards who agree with him behind closed doors), and imprisoned. The effect is the drastically disproportionate and fantastic representation of early 20th century history.

Consider the Holodomor, in which tens of millions of mostly Ukrainian Christians were murdered by the Jew Lazar Kaganovich and his Jewish NKVD deputies. He told his nephew-biographer in the late 80s “Whatever is best for the Jews. Let only that guide your actions.” And he did. The reason we never hear of him or his crimes is that the Ukrainians do not own Hollywood, they do not occupy and intimidate our parliaments and academies, our publishing houses, etc. And nor would they try, as their religion is open to all, not only some “chosen” few. I am not a Christian, but I admire the beauty if its compassion and love. Judaism, despite its brilliant public spin, is a religion of tribal unity and hatred. According to its holiest text, the Talmud, Jesus is in hell boiling in his own excrement. (Tractate Gittin 57a) And though I am quite sincere and entirely friendly to strangers, you say I should be there with him.

YOU, the television-lobotomized, hoodwinked Briton are the reason Britain criminalizes thought. Free Simon Sheppard and Luke O’Farrel! They are true Englishmen, by the standards of when England was English.

For a mind-blowing explanation of Jewish rule, read UCLB Professor Kevin MacDonald’s THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE.

For a mind-blowing explanation of the origins of WWII, Israel, the lies about Hitler and Germany, read speeches by Jewish hero Benjamin Freedman. The man was one of the top Zionists in the world, an advisor to several US presidents, a true power broker in 20th century Zionist destruction of Western civilization. One day he defected, and spent the rest of his life and massive fortune telling the truth. Your view of the world will never be the same.

Of course, this is the internet and you seem to be a general sh*t stirrer, so you probably didn’t even read the article. You just found one thing you could start drama over, and jumped on it. Good job.

And then, to take it a step further, you decided that anyone who does not conform to your world view must be an idiotic follower that lives in the Mid West. How silly of me to forget the rules of internet trolls.

Go ahead and live in your silly little internet world, I’m sure you’ll be very happy there pretending yourself to be so superior to everyone else. Have fun with that.

In the 80s I drove a bus for the disabled of North London. A huge number of elderly people (20 or 30), some with Alzheimers, had tattoos from the camps. Many lost their whole families to the gas. My headmistress was the only member of her family to survive the Warsaw Ghetto and its dissolution.

They are now pretty much all dead, and people like you will allow their memory to be libelled. The Nazis not only left the evidence of the camps and their victims to be discovered by the allied advance. They wrote it all down; the best gas to use, the best way to use the resources taken from victims, the best way to dispose of the faeces left behind by the dying. It’s all there to see in museums all across Europe, and I’ve spoken to survivors face to face, some so ill they wouldn’t have the mental resources to make it up.

Maybe people who deny the holocaust shouldn’t be locked up. But maybe they should be boiled alive in their own excrement.

If you find racism against 2 groups to be incomprehensible, then I’ve got something that will blow your mind: some people actually are prejudiced against THREE GROUPS OF PEOPLE. Or FOUR.

If that’s not bizarre enough, you’ll be flabbergasted to learn that SOME PEOPLE DON’T LIKE THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUP. Yes, Jill, its true. Sometimes they even desire to emigrate because of this.

Thanks Jill. I’m glad I could teach you something in between all that time you spend culturally enriching yourself with readers digest and family package tours.

Widen the prism you see the world through. Then try again.

But that’s my opinion.

I, for one, am finished using ‘white’ to represent a race of Caucasians. White in American society refers to clean, pure, untouched and/or sacred. Black usually refers to dirty, unclean, nasty, and most certainly impure.

From now on, I will refer to people as Caucasians and Negroid. If you have been so brainwashed as to associate those 2 races with clean/unclean or pure/impure…then you need to do a self-adjustment because that is the basic definition of a racist.

Also, anyone of the Caucasian race who insists on being called white is about as racists as you can get.

I don’t think we need to worry too much about what Negroid persons want to be called because even they don’t know, for the most part.

Maybe they need another ‘leader’ to help them figure that out.

I say that because after so many years of freedom it is easier to find a stable nuclear family of Native Americans than it is a Negroid family.

About the only thing Negroids seem to agree on is the lust to find a Caucasian woman…even if it means deserting the women of their own race completely.

/scarcasm
LoL yeah its not possible to be racist to white people because they are all the same, we should beat down some stupid fuckin crackers

It’s a sacrifice that surpasses Christ’s. A child shall lead us, indeed.

It’s still incomprehensible to me that a book can be banned and kept away from our children due to a word. TG for my hs English teacher who gave me a copy of Slaughterhouse Five anyway, and incited a love for me…

Humbert tries to drug the Lolita to have his way with her, but she instead seduces him.

the Lolita? Perhaps it is “the” as he later wrote a book about her. =)

I laugh at them in a cruel and bitter laugh, the stewards of a dead past.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Book_of_Chemistry_Experiments

It is the responsibility of the person(s) communicating a message that it is made as clearly and understandably as possible in order for the intent of the message to be properly conveyed.

However, it is ALSO the responsibility of the person(s) who receive that message to ensure that they take in the message, and analyze it to ensure that they interpret it in the way it was intended (this necessarily – and, perhaps, especially – includes poorly constructed messages).

So, while the whole “…anti-white and racist…” remark may not have been the best-worded phrase ever uttered, I personally read it as I’m sure it was intended (as Rudy mentions in comment #6).

By flying off the handle, those who complain about that statement are only proving themselves as reactionary and unthinking as those who banned the books in this post.

http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.pdf