Comments on: IBM Files for Bullet Dodging Bionic Body Armor Patent

By: Byrd Brain

Byrd Brain — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:24:17 +0000

Looks like people have already touched on my initial thoughts on this. I don’t think this is going to go the way the inventors hope it will…

By: Sean McKenna

Sean McKenna — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:25:17 +0000

I wonder how this “armor” would react to a shotgun blast?

If it tried to calculate every trajectory for every pellet and activate muscles to twitch you out of the way of each one, you might end up being folded into an origami swan.

By: clinton labombard

clinton labombard — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:38:07 +0000

I agree with AMercer, the patent laws are crap. Not to mention the obvious flaw with wet tissue versus acceleration.

By: Thebes

Thebes — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:34:42 +0000

The average distance for a criminal shooting is something like 7 yards. Say 20 feet, with the bullet moving at least 800 feet per second means that suit would need to move me out of the way in 25 milliseconds. That level of acceleration would cause lethal trauma.

So, suppose its just to protect against the extremely rare long range sniper… lets say that most of those kind of threats happen from 100 yards (far longer than the average criminal rifle shot I am sure)… even then with a rifle round moving 3000 feet per second the magical suit would still need to move me out of the way in about 0.1 seconds… seem very likely to anyone?

Perhaps this is some bizarre form of guerrilla marketing for IBM, but its not a useful device.

By: AMercer

AMercer — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:01:22 +0000

They should require the inventor to demonstrate it with live ammo. What? Can’t do it? That is because this is vaporware. A dream. IBM is putting that patent out there so they have something to sue with if someone comes out with any kind of technology that even comes close to this.

They need to revamp the law so that a person cannot get a patent with just an idea on paper. They need to build and demonstrate the actual working invention. Then they can get a patent.

By: Alex

Alex — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:04:46 +0000

Hahahaha Justin Lynes!

By: JJ

JJ — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:50:44 +0000

Angstrom has the best comment so far, and it was the first thing that i thought of….the second thing was; This body armor assumes that the shooter is a good shot. What if he/she was a liitle off, or fired more than one shot…maybe the intended victim would jerk right into the path of the bullet.

Duh…

By: angstrom

angstrom — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:42:22 +0000

If my suit ‘moved me’ at the speed of a bullet I’m pretty sure I would make a loud snapping noise as all my bones broke in unison.

Moving me about at around 1000 meters per second?
I’m probably better off taking the bullet!

By: Oliver

Oliver — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:25:19 +0000

@q_park

40 years before International Business Machine was a typewriter, it was a punch card driven database system to help the Nazis find and track Jews.

By: Justin

Justin — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:43:50 +0000

This would be pretty sweet if they can get this thing to work right.

By: apocalogy

apocalogy — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:22:16 +0000

Apparently Bush doesn’t need one because he dodges projectiles pretty effectively.

By: Snake Oil Baron

Snake Oil Baron — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:19:35 +0000

An interesting concept but I will be very skeptical until it is proven. Being able to predict human response to shock sounds very difficult and you don’t want to flip someone onto the ground while they are being shot at.

By: g.park

g.park — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:26:09 +0000

30 years ago, an International Business Machine was a typewriter. Now it’s a weapon

By: Justin Lynes

Justin Lynes — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:03:37 +0000

If only they could make it in tuxedo form and Jackie Chan could have hilarious mayhem in it.