<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 100 Best English-Language Novels of the 20th Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:31:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angelo88</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1534757</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 06:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1534757</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to be pretentious and say how many of the books on the list I&#039;ve read, but I will say that any list without Tolkein - whose work is the greatest, bar-none, of the twentieth century - or the living master/human word-safe, Cormac McCarthy, is petty, and, to say the least, uninspired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not going to be pretentious and say how many of the books on the list I've read, but I will say that any list without Tolkein - whose work is the greatest, bar-none, of the twentieth century - or the living master/human word-safe, Cormac McCarthy, is petty, and, to say the least, uninspired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1519369</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1519369</guid>
		<description>Pfft, a fraudulent list without the works of Dan Brown!!!  ;)

Seriously though, 4 of the top 10 but only 9 of the top 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfft, a fraudulent list without the works of Dan Brown!!!  <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though, 4 of the top 10 but only 9 of the top 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shay98</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1381110</link>
		<dc:creator>shay98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1381110</guid>
		<description>i have read four. Novel in English language has remained a weaker genre as compared to Russian,French  and Spanish author who could encompass bigger characters in larger environment and place them in the conflict which thrived at all levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have read four. Novel in English language has remained a weaker genre as compared to Russian,French  and Spanish author who could encompass bigger characters in larger environment and place them in the conflict which thrived at all levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scooter</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1348417</link>
		<dc:creator>Scooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1348417</guid>
		<description>Great Gatsby sucks...

any list without Tolkien is fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Gatsby sucks...</p>
<p>any list without Tolkien is fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gellner</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1348404</link>
		<dc:creator>Gellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1348404</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see Stranger in Strange Land by Heinlen, The Old Man and The Sea by Hemingway and no Tolkien.  What a sham this list was!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't see Stranger in Strange Land by Heinlen, The Old Man and The Sea by Hemingway and no Tolkien.  What a sham this list was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idil</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1348201</link>
		<dc:creator>Idil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1348201</guid>
		<description>The Great Gatsby was not so great. Any of Hemingway&#039;s novels were better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Great Gatsby was not so great. Any of Hemingway's novels were better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prairie Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1346085</link>
		<dc:creator>Prairie Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1346085</guid>
		<description>I also started Ulysses a couple times, and the only other Joyce book I&#039;ve tried to read was Finnegan&#039;s Wake, so yeah, not a real fan here. I occasionally believe the literati give a great deal of credit to authors if they make their work nearly incomprehensible to the less erudite. 

Coincidentally just finished Grapes of Wrath. Very depressing of course, but I did enjoy it and had a hard time putting it down. I have a bad habit of picking up the dialect of whatever I am watching/reading, so for a while I was drawling and droppin&#039; the en&#039;s offa words an&#039; such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also started Ulysses a couple times, and the only other Joyce book I've tried to read was Finnegan's Wake, so yeah, not a real fan here. I occasionally believe the literati give a great deal of credit to authors if they make their work nearly incomprehensible to the less erudite. </p>
<p>Coincidentally just finished Grapes of Wrath. Very depressing of course, but I did enjoy it and had a hard time putting it down. I have a bad habit of picking up the dialect of whatever I am watching/reading, so for a while I was drawling and droppin' the en's offa words an' such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1345852</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1345852</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read half of Ulysses and Portrait, three pages of Gatsby and all of The Sound and the Fury! Have to check out the full list to see how far else I need to catch up with the rest of the literary world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read half of Ulysses and Portrait, three pages of Gatsby and all of The Sound and the Fury! Have to check out the full list to see how far else I need to catch up with the rest of the literary world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1345825</link>
		<dc:creator>Karleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1345825</guid>
		<description>The Grapes of Wrath is my least favorite book of all time, so I always take these kinds of lists with a grain of salt.  I think they based their list on literary merit and style, not intrigue and plot, which is why most of us read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Grapes of Wrath is my least favorite book of all time, so I always take these kinds of lists with a grain of salt.  I think they based their list on literary merit and style, not intrigue and plot, which is why most of us read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benn</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344781</link>
		<dc:creator>benn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read Ulysses, The Great Gatsby, Lolita, and Catch-22. To me The Great Gatsby was the only one that really deserves to be here because it remains relevant. Ulysses and Lolita are too obscure to be &quot;great&quot; and Catch-22 is too dated. The one book which I&#039;d put on there is Fifth Business by Robertson Davies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read Ulysses, The Great Gatsby, Lolita, and Catch-22. To me The Great Gatsby was the only one that really deserves to be here because it remains relevant. Ulysses and Lolita are too obscure to be "great" and Catch-22 is too dated. The one book which I'd put on there is Fifth Business by Robertson Davies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmos</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344772</link>
		<dc:creator>vmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344772</guid>
		<description>gunfunbler, moby dick is 19th century innit? Anyway this list is egregiously missing &quot;Bill the galactic hero on the planet of the hippies from hell&quot; and &quot;the 13and a half lives of captain bluebear&quot;

just because a book has pictures doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not a great work of literature</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gunfunbler, moby dick is 19th century innit? Anyway this list is egregiously missing "Bill the galactic hero on the planet of the hippies from hell" and "the 13and a half lives of captain bluebear"</p>
<p>just because a book has pictures doesn't mean it's not a great work of literature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott-O</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344571</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344571</guid>
		<description>I read 12 of the 100. Nine were read because I was required to read them in school so perhaps I can really only claim 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read 12 of the 100. Nine were read because I was required to read them in school so perhaps I can really only claim 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344483</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344483</guid>
		<description>Want to chime in with another plug for Cormac MacCarthy.  Read Child of God if you can get past the subject matter, which is about as horrible as it can get.  Not for the squeamish, but the language is utterly breathtaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to chime in with another plug for Cormac MacCarthy.  Read Child of God if you can get past the subject matter, which is about as horrible as it can get.  Not for the squeamish, but the language is utterly breathtaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunfumbler</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344391</link>
		<dc:creator>gunfumbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344391</guid>
		<description>Absolutely absurd for the list not to include Moby Dick.

And, @JPFC: your inability to get through/enjoy Ulysses is explained in full by your love of Atlas Shrugged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely absurd for the list not to include Moby Dick.</p>
<p>And, @JPFC: your inability to get through/enjoy Ulysses is explained in full by your love of Atlas Shrugged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mishelley</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344323</link>
		<dc:creator>mishelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344323</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read 52 of these.
No &quot;To Kill a Mockingbird&quot;  ?!?
This list looks like it was put together by people who want other people to think they are smart and well read.
Frankly, life is to short to read Joyce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read 52 of these.<br />
No "To Kill a Mockingbird"  ?!?<br />
This list looks like it was put together by people who want other people to think they are smart and well read.<br />
Frankly, life is to short to read Joyce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPFC</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344243</link>
		<dc:creator>JPFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344243</guid>
		<description>by thwe by, I&#039;ve only read 18 on the list.  &quot;Atlas Shrugged&quot; should have been included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by thwe by, I've only read 18 on the list.  "Atlas Shrugged" should have been included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPFC</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344232</link>
		<dc:creator>JPFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344232</guid>
		<description>Who are they guys that write these lists and why is Ulysses always at the top of every one of them?  I&#039;ve tried to read it at least 5 times and can&#039;t get more than 50 pages in.  And never met anybody that ever has admitted to reading it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are they guys that write these lists and why is Ulysses always at the top of every one of them?  I've tried to read it at least 5 times and can't get more than 50 pages in.  And never met anybody that ever has admitted to reading it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344180</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344180</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t there be some P.G. Wodehouse on this list? Maybe &quot;The Code of the Woosters&quot;?

Just because it&#039;s hilarious doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t a great work of literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn't there be some P.G. Wodehouse on this list? Maybe "The Code of the Woosters"?</p>
<p>Just because it's hilarious doesn't mean it isn't a great work of literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344168</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344168</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read 6 of the top 10 and I started Ulysses several times.

:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read 6 of the top 10 and I started Ulysses several times.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleek</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1344032</link>
		<dc:creator>cleek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1344032</guid>
		<description>strange that Mockingbird isn&#039;t on there, nor Confederacy of Dunces. 

and yes, Cormac McCarthy is a great writer. i spent a few months reading everything of his i could find, and burned out on him, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>strange that Mockingbird isn't on there, nor Confederacy of Dunces. </p>
<p>and yes, Cormac McCarthy is a great writer. i spent a few months reading everything of his i could find, and burned out on him, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpus</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343981</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343981</guid>
		<description>You can tell this list comes from &#039;literary&#039; critics.  Note the almost complete lack of fantasy, science fiction (except &#039;1984&#039; and &#039;Brave New World&#039; - both written by &#039;literary&#039; writers), and mystery (except for nods to Dashiell Hammett and Norman Mailer, the latter of which I didn&#039;t think was that great a writer).  How about &#039;The Lord of the Rings&#039;, &#039;Dune&#039;, or anything by Ray Bradbury or Raymond Chandler?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell this list comes from 'literary' critics.  Note the almost complete lack of fantasy, science fiction (except '1984' and 'Brave New World' - both written by 'literary' writers), and mystery (except for nods to Dashiell Hammett and Norman Mailer, the latter of which I didn't think was that great a writer).  How about 'The Lord of the Rings', 'Dune', or anything by Ray Bradbury or Raymond Chandler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake D.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been hearing a lot about Cormac McCarthy (He wrote the novel No Country for Old Men) lately, and how I need to read his stuff. My friend is going to lend me Blood Meridian today, and he keeps telling me I&#039;m not going to like it because of McCarthy&#039;s style of writing. I looked into it and it&#039;s very poetic.

I&#039;m surprised he&#039;s not on this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been hearing a lot about Cormac McCarthy (He wrote the novel No Country for Old Men) lately, and how I need to read his stuff. My friend is going to lend me Blood Meridian today, and he keeps telling me I'm not going to like it because of McCarthy's style of writing. I looked into it and it's very poetic.</p>
<p>I'm surprised he's not on this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343889</guid>
		<description>I was such a bookworm when I was a kid but somewhere along the line I lost it. I&#039;ve read precious few of these books. I thought I was a more literate person than that. It&#039;s kind of humbling! These days it seems like all my reading is web surfing. But I should add that, though I&#039;ve only read bits and pieces of Joyce&#039;s work, I&#039;m surprised to see him so high on this list. Like others have commented on here, didn&#039;t he write mostly gibberish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was such a bookworm when I was a kid but somewhere along the line I lost it. I've read precious few of these books. I thought I was a more literate person than that. It's kind of humbling! These days it seems like all my reading is web surfing. But I should add that, though I've only read bits and pieces of Joyce's work, I'm surprised to see him so high on this list. Like others have commented on here, didn't he write mostly gibberish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343884</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343884</guid>
		<description>Read 9 of the 100, going to check out several on that list. I&#039;ve always prefered the classics over modern literature, but should add that I only found this in my 20&#039;s while in school I hated that stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read 9 of the 100, going to check out several on that list. I've always prefered the classics over modern literature, but should add that I only found this in my 20's while in school I hated that stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanniefarkle</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343578</link>
		<dc:creator>fanniefarkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343578</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read 8 out of the top 10.  Never even heard of Darkness at Noon.  Will have to check that one out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read 8 out of the top 10.  Never even heard of Darkness at Noon.  Will have to check that one out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paco</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343377</link>
		<dc:creator>paco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read about half of them. Of the half I haven&#039;t read, at least half of those are ones (like &lt;i&gt;Catch 22&lt;/i&gt;) that I very much want to read.

avraamov: Ulysses is still in English. It&#039;s Finnegan&#039;s that takes the real leap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read about half of them. Of the half I haven't read, at least half of those are ones (like <i>Catch 22</i>) that I very much want to read.</p>
<p>avraamov: Ulysses is still in English. It's Finnegan's that takes the real leap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom m</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343235</link>
		<dc:creator>tom m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343235</guid>
		<description>Out of the 100, Ive read 2. Which is interesting considering that I have read about 10,000 books in my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of the 100, Ive read 2. Which is interesting considering that I have read about 10,000 books in my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Pink</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343211</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Pink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343211</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;Catcher in the Rye&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about "Catcher in the Rye"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343132</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343132</guid>
		<description>Pretentious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretentious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avraamov</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1343003</link>
		<dc:creator>avraamov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/05/the-100-best-english-language-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-1343003</guid>
		<description>ulysses? english language? that&#039;s debatable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ulysses? english language? that's debatable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/36 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 14:36:27 -->