Comments on: Hari Puttar: Bollywood’s Answer to Harry Potter and Home Alone

By: DOJ

DOJ — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:34:19 +0000

@Gaulder – I Wish! I mean, look, you can totally see through it! *smile*

By: Gauldar

Gauldar — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:37:11 +0000

DOJ, you mean they are selling Crystal Pepsi again!?!

By: Evilbeagle

Evilbeagle — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:12:00 +0000

Pretty ridiculous to sue. It’s just WB attempting (and comically failing) at a money grab.

Now that I am thinking about it, I hated Home Alone.

By: DOJ

DOJ — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:10:24 +0000

I see this as identical to selling canned sea water labeled “Pepzi: Special”

By: Hari

Hari — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:16:31 +0000

this was really ridiculous because it isn’t even a copy of harry potter…you should see some of the movies made in India, more than half are (BAD) copies of American movies and I’m not sure that they even had the rights to make them.

By: Larfin Jackarse

Larfin Jackarse — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:32:58 +0000

They’re stealing from thieves.

By: Ajan

Ajan — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:50:45 +0000

Firstly, there’s nothing like “BOLLYWWOD”, its just a local nick-name.
Secondly, if spelt in the Non-Indian tongue/language “Hari Puttar” sounds as “Harry Potter”.
Thirdly, Warner Bros’. case was baseless and ignorant.

By: Itteh

Itteh — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:49:20 +0000

I am almost certain that Hari Puttar has nothing at all to do with Harry Potter, which makes Warner Bros. even more ridiculous for trying to sue. The only similarity is the title.