P.S. – to those of you wondering why he spent so much and didn’t get a degree – read closer. He did. He also WAS an officer – second lieutenant is an officer – a junior officer, but still an officer. chances are he wasn’t a Marine that long.

Don’t make crass generalizations, for instance, “Neither I, nor you, know ANY military member that has that attitude.” Referring to an attitude of entitlement. Maybe violet does know military individuals with this attitude, because I do. I know others that don’t. Some people use their status, be what it may, executive, lawyer, celebrity, to justify what they are entitled to.

You claim that violet hates the military, but she (assuming a “she”) merely criticized the father’s and others failed logic of entitlement because of one’s service. Criticism should not be perceived as hate especially when one asks valid questions. Her phrasing may have been more harsh than appropriate. We may not have parades for clerks, but we do have gay pride parades. I’m sure any organization could get a parade together, its a military tradition to have parades. Off on a tangent I know.

I also resent your assumption that violet is a “freeloader.” Well, isn’t the father in this article freeloading off of his son’s service? It is exploitation and it is wrong.

Yes, you are in fact right that the U.S. military delivers over four billion dollars in aid to foreign countries. Most of it goes to three countries: Israel, Egypt, and Columbia.

You also accuse violet of lying, but she does not. You may have found some of her assumptions misguided, but never did she lie. Your off base attacks to a person criticizing the military are simply ridiculous. I thought they taught manners in the Navy.

I would hate to be in the military or ex-military right now, with all the criticism. It is a tough job.

What’s sad is that this guy’s parents are exploiting his military status as an excuse to forgive a debt that they incurred. And the fella never even saw combat.

The question is apt – why should he be treated any differently from the rest of the population?

Your post was actually a teaching metaphor about the inadequacy of mental healthcare for veterans who have suffered profound psychological injury as a result of their service, the amelioration of which sad state of affairs I strongly support. I think it’s terrible that the people represented by your cleverly-constructed example are not getting the help they need.

Do you have an organization through which you further engender awareness of this matter, some literature I could look at? I’d love to get more involved. In any case, well-played, sir.

I don’t like how some people like to shame organizations into forgiving something they are liable for.

I stand by every word I wrote.

OM, Perhaps you need to take off your rose colored glasses. Since when is spewing lies considered a “good point”? Sorry, I’ll never help someone tell bald faced lies. Especially when directed at me. I never said military service made a person more worthy. I’d appreciate it if you wouldn’t insinuate that I did. Violet is the one that denigrated all military members with the lies she spouted about them. I’m supposed to sit here and let her filth go by without calling her out. Sorry, it will never happen.

ted, I’m supposed to sit here and let some twit spit out lies about me and other military members. She’s lucky I didn’t tell her how I really felt.

violet, “measured, thoughtful, judicious personality”, like your spewing total lies huh. Do as I say not as I do doesn’t cut it. There’s a huge difference between a mere disagreement and some low life spouting lie upon lie about something I and plenty of others hold dear. As I said “DON’T BE JEALOUS”.

The real heroes are those who know they probably won’t get any recognition for their work, yet are contempt in knowing they’ve made someone else’s day (or life) a little better. You could argue that people serving in the military fit into this category. Some undoubtedly do. Serving in the military doesn’t make you a more worthy human being.

“… Why does choosing to be in the military make you forever and always a special wonderful person who deserves extra crap?”

As a retired navy man I resent the Hell out of your comments! Neither I, nor you, know ANY military member that has that attitude. I won’t waste my time asking you how much time you served your country. We both know the answer to that don’t we freeloader.

“I’m not making a point about the military per se right now, but you know, there are lots of career paths that are at least as honorable.”

Sure would have fooled me!

“If someone chose to be a chiropractor or a soup kitchen worker because they actually wanted to ease the suffering of others,”

Yet more crap, to use your word, from someone that obviously hates the military. For your information the U.S. military delivers millions upon millions of dollars of aid every year to ease the suffering of others all over the world. They do more good than you could ever imagine. And they don’t do it for ingrates like you.

would we be expected to give them a free ride forever,

Another bald faced lie. Why do you hate the military so much? Could it be that they refused to accept such a classless jerk as you?

“or do this pseudo-canonization thing that goes on with military folks? Is it because you might die if you join the military? Seriously, I’m asking. Because liquor store clerks are at very high risk for violence as well, and we don’t have parades for them.”

You make me want to retch. There is not ONE military person, past or present, that isn’t a much better person than you could ever be. Don’t be jealous!

“We can’t all be heroes because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by.” Will Rogers

(That will get her knickers in a wad!)

If someone chose to be a chiropractor or a soup kitchen worker because they actually wanted to ease the suffering of others, would we be expected to give them a free ride forever, or do this pseudo-canonization thing that goes on with military folks? Is it because you might die if you join the military? Seriously, I’m asking. Because liquor store clerks are at very high risk for violence as well, and we don’t have parades for them.

He was supposed to go to Iraq, but died not long before his unit shipped out in a motorcycle accident.

‘His unit shipped out in a motorcycle accident’..??

That must have been messy.

Sorry. It was too ripe of a target.

…tom…
.

But I’m wondering, why would someone who joined the military get a free pass? Even if he would have died in combat, thats a consequence of the person’s decision (if you join the military, you have to know that you might die. especially if there’s a war going on). But that aside, he didn’t die in combat anyhow.

It like the parents are trying to profit as much as they can off the pity of others. It would such to be in their situation, losing a kid and inheriting his debt, but I see no reason for them to be helped out more than any other non-military parents in their situation.

especially $50K+ with no insurance…

http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/396791.html

Sorry but lots of people have hard, dangerous jobs. Fishermen are more likely to die on the job and troops, and they dont get public housing either.

Cry me a river.

We have this system called Fraction Reserve Banking, essentially it means that for a bank to issue a loan, they only need to hold in reserve a percentage of that loan amount. Let us assume that a bank has to hold 10% reserve on loans, that means for a $100,000 they only need to have $10,000 in assets to issue that loan. The other $90,000 is created out of thin air. So when you then pay back the $100,000 + interest they then have that $100,000 to make new loans on and can now lend out $990,000, having only risked $10,000 to begin with. The process goes on and on.

At current the actual reserve percentage for banks is far lower than the that of the 10% I use in my example. So next time you hear about a bank being complete a-holes over some debt they want repaid, ask yourself how much stake do they really have in that loan, because chances are if the debtor made any payments the amount of money the lender actually risked has already been paid back.

Basically the kid got his education and decided to join the Marines. He could have been an officer, which you need a degree for.

Sallie Mae is right in that it still asked for the money because they still had to pay the school. It’s not fair to always stick it to the lender. Now I will argue that the interest rate on the loans that Sallie Mae gives is pretty crazy. I’m paying almost 9% and over the course of the 30 years on my loan it’ll total around $340k if I only make the minimum payments. So if you look at it that way then you can see they are making a pretty good deal of $ and a 53k forgiveness isn’t too bad.. But when a lot of people are getting forgiven, you can see the problem.

To add to the fact that Sallie Mae sucks at customer service… They outsource their customer support to India. Not that they are bad people over there, it’s just hard to communicate when the english they learn is not the same english we speak and it’s tough to communicate properly. I finally got to the claims department and spoke to an American woman and she told me that all of Sallie Mae is based in America, even after I explained that I spoke to 4 different people with Indian accent. Poor customer service, but if that’s the worst of it then whatever.

Working for a loan company I’ve watched over 60 of my fellow co-workers be laid off in the last year because of higher than expected defaults and payment uncertainty. That 53 grand represents someones salary. That money was put up by investors who are out of pocket. Forgiving debts like that makes the system crumble by creating a fear of lending which is contributing to the credit crisis we are currently facing. The more student loans that default the harder it becomes for students to get loans.

But why is his father on the hook unless he co-signed the loans? And why would he do that if his son was only going to enlist anyhow — clearly the son wouldn’t be able to pay. You don’t need $53K (plus the other loans… that was just Sallie Mae’s chunk) in education just to enlist in the Marines. A high school education works fine. If you *do* want to go to college, ROTC would have picked up the tab.

Question for Josh: You said you are now welching on $1400 a month student loan payment, giving them only $350. Were the loan terms a surprise to you? Didn’t you know how much you would have to pay and how often? Why take out such onerous loans if the education they provide won’t return that sort of income? IS Sallie Mae suing you now or somehow attempting to garnish your wages? Sorry for being nosy, just curious. I went to engineering school — lots of folks had loans upon exit, but they all got jobs sufficient for them to pay. Why take a $100K loan to get an art degree?

Becoming a soldier (especially voluntarily) does not automatically transfer responsibility for one’s financial situation to the government.

If it was co-signed, doesn’t the co-signer owe the $53k? Isn’t that the point of the co-signer?

Only one out of three lenders is seeking money, and that comes to $53k. How much did he borrow in total? What college is that expensive?

I think his father co-signed the loan (I’m guessing here), so he is liable for it.

I’m curious, have you ever spent any time in the military?

Isn’t this what life insurance is for?

The loan company provided the family with a service and as such should be compensated.

Sure he joined the service, that’s great. But had he not got into a motorcycle wreck he would be still paying his bills off.

I’m as patriotic as they come, and as such, I believe that the company has every right to demand payment.