<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: liphttam1</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1283059</link>
		<dc:creator>liphttam1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1283059</guid>
		<description>I disagree with alot of them though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with alot of them though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1279764</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1279764</guid>
		<description>Shopped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shopped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glutnix</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1279116</link>
		<dc:creator>Glutnix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1279116</guid>
		<description>NGC 7331 backwards is 1337 CGN... now we&#039;re talking :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NGC 7331 backwards is 1337 CGN&#8230; now we&#8217;re talking <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben G.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1278276</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1278276</guid>
		<description>I love this pic. It makes you realize how big the univers is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this pic. It makes you realize how big the univers is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALLAH AKBAR</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1278104</link>
		<dc:creator>ALLAH AKBAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1278104</guid>
		<description>This is the work of the Shatan! Allah be praised to destroy the kaffir telescope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the work of the Shatan! Allah be praised to destroy the kaffir telescope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1277847</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1277847</guid>
		<description>My big problem with most astronomy pictures is that they are essentially fakes.  NASA (and astronomers in general for that matter) were masters of photoshopping before there was even a Photoshop.  While the basics of an image may be factual, the stuff the space and astronomy industry (and it is an industry) puts out for public consumption is VERY HIGHLY enhanced/sharpened/colorized/etc. to make it much more exciting to the public, i.e. both taxpayers and politicians controlling the purse strings. 

So, unfortunately, you can&#039;t really have much faith in any of the publicly released images.  No doubt that good research is being done, but everything is so tinkered with by graphic artists it&#039;s not really science anymore.  The real (more raw) scientifically valid images (and they exist) don&#039;t frequently see the light of day because they have a lot less WOW factor for people weaned on Star Wars, Star Trek, and the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My big problem with most astronomy pictures is that they are essentially fakes.  NASA (and astronomers in general for that matter) were masters of photoshopping before there was even a Photoshop.  While the basics of an image may be factual, the stuff the space and astronomy industry (and it is an industry) puts out for public consumption is VERY HIGHLY enhanced/sharpened/colorized/etc. to make it much more exciting to the public, i.e. both taxpayers and politicians controlling the purse strings. </p>
<p>So, unfortunately, you can&#8217;t really have much faith in any of the publicly released images.  No doubt that good research is being done, but everything is so tinkered with by graphic artists it&#8217;s not really science anymore.  The real (more raw) scientifically valid images (and they exist) don&#8217;t frequently see the light of day because they have a lot less WOW factor for people weaned on Star Wars, Star Trek, and the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1277541</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1277541</guid>
		<description>Phil&#039;s passion, breadth of knowledge and humanity will make him an Internet icon for as long as he cares to blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil&#8217;s passion, breadth of knowledge and humanity will make him an Internet icon for as long as he cares to blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1277448</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21484#comment-1277448</guid>
		<description>I like &quot;The Mote In Sauron&#039;s Eye&quot;...clever.  Interesting pick for number 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like &#8220;The Mote In Sauron&#8217;s Eye&#8221;&#8230;clever.  Interesting pick for number 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:00:55 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0957 seconds -->
