The Deer Strikes Back

By Alex in Animals & Pets on Dec 2, 2008 at 3:12 pm

Randy Goodman of Sedalia, Missouri, thought that he had killed a deer with a well-placed shot to the neck. As he marvelled over his lucky catch, the deer came to life and exacted a little revenge:

As the nine-point, 240-pound buck lay lifeless the unexpected happened. The buck stood up and knocked Goodman on his butt, attacking him with his antlers.

“It was 15 seconds of hell,” Goodman said. Goodman thought the deer was trying to go through him as he fought it off the best he could. A few seconds later, the deer was off and running. “I felt his front legs go over my face,” Goodman said.

The buck ran 30 yards and fell down again and Goodman was worried the deer wasn’t done yet. “If he was going to come back I would be in trouble because I was in too much pain,” Goodman said.

Link (Photo: Randy Goodman)


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: , , ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Woogie
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    Too bad the deer didn’t kill him. Hunters are sick fucks.

  2. Patrick
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    @woogie: Do you understand where food comes from?

    Food wise, you have two ways of going about things:
    1) Gather or grow your own food
    2) Pay someone else to do it and pretend to understand how the food system works, while actually not having a clue.

    You’re a hypocrite unless you’re doing all your own farming, with all organic ingredients, and making sure that all your soil is turned by hand so that no adorable animals are killed by a tractor. MAYBE one in five hundred people in America live that way.

    Eat eggs? What do you think happens to male chickens who are born on an egg farm? They’re fed into a machine that grinds them up, alive, into feed.

    Eat foods fertilized with organic fertilizers other than straight up compost? Where do you think all that animal shit comes from?

    Eat vegetables you didn’t grow and didn’t come from a local CSA? Who do you think picked those peppers? Guys bringing in $70K a year and working in some sort of fantasy land where farming isn’t horribly dangerous, dirty, exhausting work?

    A deer is the ultimate local food source. It ate grains from the farm it lived near. It’s a renewable resource. The guy that shoots it takes it home rather than shipping it cross country on a truck.

    Have a little more respect for people who are willing to do things the hard way.

  3. darlzwik
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    I hope you are joking Woogie. There are so many deer around here that if people didn’t hunt some of them, they would just about move in your house with you. I’ve seen as many as 17 crossing through my yard at once. They come right into the cities and jump through picture windows. They wreck gardens and farms. They smash the Sh*t out of cars. I say, “extend the hunting season and get rid of more of these 200 pound vermin”. God bless deer hunters.

  4. Evilbeagle
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    In Texas, where my dad lives, deer are considered vermin, and with good reason. darlzwik already went into that, so I will not expand on it.

    Venison is probably one of the tastiest meats outside of alligator as far as I am concerned, and I am glad I live in the UK, where it is readily available in the store most of the year. I wish it were more like that in the States because it is also very healthy.

    I have all the respect in the world for the responsible hunter, and though this story is kind of funny, it drives home the point… if you hit a deer, shoot it, or otherwise stun it, never approach it until you are sure it’s dead. Deer may be skittish and people may want to associate them with a Disney cartoon, but they can also be very dangerous.

  5. mu
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 5:29 pm

    I’m with everyone else beating up on Woogie. I have a lot more respect for someone that hunts, kills, and butchers their own meat than someone that just picks it up at a store without having to get their hands dirty.

    I question the ethics of anyone that eats something they can’t kill and butcher themselves; this limits me to plants, fish, and other “primitive” life forms that I can’t empathize with.

  6. Justin
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    It’s funny how no one complains when they call an exterminator to take care of their rat problem, but when its a cute lil’ deer IT’S WRONG!

  7. Evilbeagle
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    It’s also funny how somehow, the life of a deer is more valuable than that of a human, one’s own species.

    But yeah, I’m with Patrick and mu here. I think that people would have a deeper appreciation for life in general if they acknowledged that the meat on their plate once had a face and deserves to be well prepared and never wasted given how it is feeding us and keeping us healthy and well… alive.

    I am not a hunter myself, though I fish and have raised hogs for slaughter. Those experiences have taught me more about the value of life than any tree hugging PETArd type could ever hope to understand.

  8. morlock
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    oh whatever, leave woogie alone. he/she is entitled to an opinion without a bunch of blowhards giving them a talking to for supposed naivete.

    hunters aren’t anymore noble than someone who works at a farm killing things, or anyone else for that matter. they’re generally dips- they hide out in expensive little tents, in expensive cammo with equipment and guns and shoot things as they walk by. how heroic! how challenging.

    it boils down to this: one animal stalking and killing another. and if its not ok to root for the opposition, then its not really a sport, is it? its just a process… at which point it might as well be a killing floor. and hey, what about that poor schlub making a living feeding turkeys to the grinder?? you don’t think that’s “the hard way”? p’shah

    and its not being hypocritical to have a problem with killing things for kicks (and that’s what most hunting is- the thrill of the hunt).
    there’s nothing wrong with trying to minimize your negative impact however you can. just because you’re not sin free doesn’t mean you can’t try to be good. so you eat candy that contains animal products? does that mean that being against someone kicking a dog is hypocritical? of course not. THAT’S naive. i mean, being prolife, talking about the sanctity of all life, but supporting the death penalty- now that’s hypocritical.

    i have no respect for anyone that thinks its fun to take the one thing anyone or anything truly owns- their life. you have to be pretty damn full of yourself to think that’s your right, especially for sport. if you’re in the Donner family and its the only way, yeah sure. someone’s trying to kill you? yeah alright.
    but if the thing has a prob with you trying to off it and it stomps yer face? good on it. go deer.

    now if this was a fair fight, naked guy in the woods in winter with some pointy sticks tied to his head facing off against a deer… i might be rooting for the guy.

    resume blowhardery y’all.

  9. DOJ
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 7:32 pm

    irresponsible hunter deserved a kick in the face

    hopefully he, and other’s hearing his story, will have a greater respect for danger

  10. liphttam1
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 9:51 pm

    I hate to say it but, realy to bad that the deer died. Must a mention a vegetarian again. Go WOOGIE!! and DOJ!!!

  11. Peeves
    Dec 2nd, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    Well said Morlock. And you have got to be naive if you believe that this man feeds himself and his family purely on what he kills.

    So a shooter had a harder time killing an animal than he originally thought he would. Whatever. There’s no lesson for anyone here..he’ll probably hunt again, just from a longer distance and with more bullets.

  12. StuckeyJ
    Dec 3rd, 2008 at 12:06 am

    Heh, all I had to read was the city, and I am not surprised. lol

  13. darlzwik
    Dec 3rd, 2008 at 6:35 am

    I knew this guy back in the late 80s, that would buy an old junker car in the fall, and go hunt deer with it. He didn’t care if he had to go off the road or in the ditch, he would get a deer. He didn’t need to buy a license, gun, tree stand, or any of that fancy stuff. He did it for the meat, and for the meat only. He was at least as successful as legal “Sportsmen”. He could sell the car later for the metal, if it didn’t run.

  14. Evilbeagle
    Dec 3rd, 2008 at 8:15 am

    I grew up in a community where hunting was the norm, and of all the hunters I’ve known, I can maybe count one or two that hunted purely for the trophy. The animals were always eaten.

    These supposed animal lovers want to demonize the hunter, but the fact is, hunting keeps a balance in the eco system. If the deer population is out of control, other animals, like rabbits, for example, have little to eat. This in turn hurts the predators who feed on rabbits and so on.

    This denial that humans are not animals and a part of the food chain is a pretty sad statement about our society. We are animals, we eat meat, and there’s nothing wrong with that unless the meat we are eating is endangered. Those that claim it’s unfair to stalk and hunt an animal with a gun are ignorant. It’s not that easy to do. Furthermore, if you look at predatory animals in the wild, they do the same, and they don’t get the clean kills that hunters strive for. They tend to start eating while Bambi is still alive.

    Hunting licenses are there to track the number of animals culled. This keeps people from over hunting or not hunting enough.

    Those people who think that they are somehow better or enlightened because they are against hunting have zero understanding of nature or animals because they are so bent on saving the cute animals that if they had their way, they would be the ones responsible for their demise.

  15. Scooter
    Dec 3rd, 2008 at 11:16 am

    I don’t live far from that city and have relatives living there (home of the Goober burger).

    As far as hunting goes unless you are a plant all things must kill to survive. Imagine the thousands of living beings you kill when you brush your teeth. You think shooting a dear is less “humane” than a Lion taking down a Gazelle and eating it alive? That seems weird to me.

  16. Dianne
    Dec 3rd, 2008 at 11:31 am

    I’m with Woogie. If somebody going out to get a deer for food because their family is starving, that’s one thing. But I’ve heard of hunters who don’t even bother to check if the deer is dead….they just shoot for target practice and leave them out in the field to die. Don’t care what anybody says – THAT’S SICK.

  17. Sheldon
    Dec 3rd, 2008 at 5:52 pm

    Peeves and Morlock-
    Really?
    I’m from a town in Missouri where we hunt as well. My family owns about 100 acres, and we don’t shoot the deer just for sport, or even spend a ton of money on camo and equipment like you seem to believe is the case. Hunting is legal for a reason: overpopulation. There are too many deer as it is, and hunting keeps them in check. Which would you rather have: so many deer that they are all dying of starvation because they are eating all of the food, or having hunters attempt to control the population?

    Also, most hunters (I’m not claiming all, but everyone I hunt with is included in this) eat the meat from the deer. It’s quite tasty and there’s a lot of it, so we don’t have to spend a lot of money on hamburger and other meats. Yes, it is an adrenaline rush, but it’s legal and I don’t see anything wrong with it to be honest.

  18. stevetemkin
    Dec 4th, 2008 at 1:59 am

    What strikes me is the lack of proper procedure in a hunting situation like this. Everyone know that when there hasn’t been a clean kill, it’s only humane to finish the injured creature off. That deer should have doubled back and put the hunter out of his misery.

  19. darlzwik
    Dec 4th, 2008 at 6:58 am

    Let’s not forget that if it weren’t for the hunter based environmental groups, this continent (North America) would have been trashed before the end of the 1920s, and about 80-85% of all current grass roots environmentalism is done by hunting groups. (Ducks unlimited, Pheasants forever, etc….)

  20. samlive
    Dec 4th, 2008 at 9:11 pm

    I just dont like to kill things. Doesnt make me any better or worse than someone that hunts. Damnit people stop getting so angry at each other!

    All I have to say is: This story is newsworthy???? Come-awn.

  21. Rocky Rook
    Dec 4th, 2008 at 10:26 pm

    I’m all for hunting deer … especially after watching The Ring 2.

  22. raina_c
    Dec 5th, 2008 at 1:55 am

    Wish the deer was able to finish him off. Men who hunt are using the guns as extensions…you know trying to make up for their “short comings” :D

  23. Evilbeagle
    Dec 5th, 2008 at 3:37 am

    @Rocky Rook

    If ever you are in the Austin area, around Lake Travis, that scene plays itself out any time you drive up around there. I hated going anywhere near the lake because I always feared that no matter how careful I was, I would hit one of those vermin. They just hang out in the road in huge numbers.

    When I saw that movie, even though I thought it sort of stunk, I was so creeped out by that scene because of that.

    Seriously, though, I think tonight is going to be a venison night around here.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page