http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/ The Neat Side of the Web Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:24:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1095098 Thomas Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:13:13 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1095098 Mimosa, you say...? Mimosa, you say…?

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1094268 Alex Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:19:12 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1094268 Rescued by Arch Student! Thank you! Rescued by Arch Student! Thank you!

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1094195 Arch Student Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:44:38 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1094195 In Archaeology terms, prehistoric is normally defined as being before the written word or written record (not to be confused with petroglyphs or "cave art") was kept. Technically, if a culture did not develop a written record keeping system until very late in history, then they could still be considered "prehistoric" even if the rest of the world had moved beyond that phase. There are still tribes of people that are technically prehistoric today, although their numbers are diminishing. In Archaeology terms, prehistoric is normally defined as being before the written word or written record (not to be confused with petroglyphs or “cave art”) was kept. Technically, if a culture did not develop a written record keeping system until very late in history, then they could still be considered “prehistoric” even if the rest of the world had moved beyond that phase. There are still tribes of people that are technically prehistoric today, although their numbers are diminishing.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1093473 Lemons Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:34:48 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1093473 4th century BC is hardly "prehistoric," it was near the height of ancient Greece (although I'm not sure if anyone's documented *their* drug usage). 4th century BC is hardly “prehistoric,” it was near the height of ancient Greece (although I’m not sure if anyone’s documented *their* drug usage).

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1093370 Ali S. Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:32:32 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1093370 Well, if they are really "prehistoric" I guess it would make sense to get high every now and then because I sure wouldn't like living in the ye olde times. Well, if they are really “prehistoric” I guess it would make sense to get high every now and then because I sure wouldn’t like living in the ye olde times.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1093034 Johnny Cat Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:06:39 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1093034 Og bogart tubes, camp out with bowl. No fumes for rest of us today. Og bogart tubes, camp out with bowl. No fumes for rest of us today.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1092983 Pudifoot Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:16:57 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1092983 400bc = prehistoric? :-/ 400bc = prehistoric? :-/

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1092968 mkultra Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:02:41 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/20/the-stoner-age/#comment-1092968 I don't suppose there is any info about how the hallucinogen was made from those beans? I ask merely out of curiosity. I don’t suppose there is any info about how the hallucinogen was made from those beans? I ask merely out of curiosity.

]]>