<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pain in the Royal Horse: 5 Sex Rumors About Royalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrogoth</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1959878</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrogoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1959878</guid>
		<description>There was to be a second Taj, a black one, that would have faced the white one. A his and hers. Sadly they ran out of support/money for the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was to be a second Taj, a black one, that would have faced the white one. A his and hers. Sadly they ran out of support/money for the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zindadil</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1279979</link>
		<dc:creator>Zindadil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1279979</guid>
		<description>thank God we dont have royalty today. Power to the People.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank God we dont have royalty today. Power to the People.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zindadil</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1279978</link>
		<dc:creator>Zindadil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1279978</guid>
		<description>This Shahjehan love affair cost the public a fortune. It was tax payer money. The poor remained poor and the rich could have all they wanted. One big monument for a stupid love.  Rumors are that the hand of the artisans who build the Taj Mahal were cut off so that no one could copy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Shahjehan love affair cost the public a fortune. It was tax payer money. The poor remained poor and the rich could have all they wanted. One big monument for a stupid love.  Rumors are that the hand of the artisans who build the Taj Mahal were cut off so that no one could copy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopalan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1188640</link>
		<dc:creator>gopalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1188640</guid>
		<description>Loadedguns, Please check again, both you and neatorama are right! Nur Jahan was the favourite wife of Jahangir; Mumtaz, the wife of Shah Jahan (son of Jahangir), the inspiration for the Taj Mahal, was the daughter of the brother of Nur Jahan. Thus, both are right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loadedguns, Please check again, both you and neatorama are right! Nur Jahan was the favourite wife of Jahangir; Mumtaz, the wife of Shah Jahan (son of Jahangir), the inspiration for the Taj Mahal, was the daughter of the brother of Nur Jahan. Thus, both are right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1095835</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1095835</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget about Prince Charles son William, and Williams half-brother Harry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about Prince Charles son William, and Williams half-brother Harry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stajduhar</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1095330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stajduhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1095330</guid>
		<description>Catherine the Great&#039;s husband was Peter III not Fredrick whoever that was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine the Great&#8217;s husband was Peter III not Fredrick whoever that was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loadedguns</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089798</link>
		<dc:creator>Loadedguns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 05:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089798</guid>
		<description>Alex!
I take my words back...except one thing - we should not forget that Shah Jehan&#039;s period was one of greatest prosperity during Mughal reign in India. When you say 300 wives and 5000 concubines, it seems like a porno epic. But it is not so. In that period of instability and revolts, greatest thing which mattered was having a son. Having this &#039;janankhana&#039; or &#039;harem&#039; was a provision for bad times (the more women you have, the greater is your prestige). I wonder many of these concubines and wives even ever met Shah Jehan. Further this was a common practice in Medieval times. This fact alone is not sufficient to brand a good king Jahangir as a sex maniac [and you put him at no. 1 of all!!!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex!<br />
I take my words back&#8230;except one thing &#8211; we should not forget that Shah Jehan&#8217;s period was one of greatest prosperity during Mughal reign in India. When you say 300 wives and 5000 concubines, it seems like a porno epic. But it is not so. In that period of instability and revolts, greatest thing which mattered was having a son. Having this &#8216;janankhana&#8217; or &#8216;harem&#8217; was a provision for bad times (the more women you have, the greater is your prestige). I wonder many of these concubines and wives even ever met Shah Jehan. Further this was a common practice in Medieval times. This fact alone is not sufficient to brand a good king Jahangir as a sex maniac [and you put him at no. 1 of all!!!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089418</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089418</guid>
		<description>Geez, Alex, you made me re-read my comment.

The position of &quot;consul&quot; is more like &quot;president&quot;. Not every senator became consul. And I was wrong - Suetonius doesn&#039;t say that he made the horse senator. Cassius Dio, who wrote may years later, says that the horse did get a priesthood, though.

My point was mostly about the alleged bestiality, which has no basis in ancient historians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, Alex, you made me re-read my comment.</p>
<p>The position of &#8220;consul&#8221; is more like &#8220;president&#8221;. Not every senator became consul. And I was wrong &#8211; Suetonius doesn&#8217;t say that he made the horse senator. Cassius Dio, who wrote may years later, says that the horse did get a priesthood, though.</p>
<p>My point was mostly about the alleged bestiality, which has no basis in ancient historians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089362</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089362</guid>
		<description>Loadedgun, the article is about Jahangir, the father of Prince Khurram, who later became Shah Jahan

Nur Jahan was Jahangir&#039;s favorite wife. Her niece was Mumtaz Mahal, whom Shah Jahan married and made Taj Mahal for.

Ted, Incitatus was never made consul - Roman historian Suetonius wrote that Caligula *planned* to make the horse a consul. Later, the controversy was why: a lot of people thought it was a stunt to annoy the senators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loadedgun, the article is about Jahangir, the father of Prince Khurram, who later became Shah Jahan</p>
<p>Nur Jahan was Jahangir&#8217;s favorite wife. Her niece was Mumtaz Mahal, whom Shah Jahan married and made Taj Mahal for.</p>
<p>Ted, Incitatus was never made consul &#8211; Roman historian Suetonius wrote that Caligula *planned* to make the horse a consul. Later, the controversy was why: a lot of people thought it was a stunt to annoy the senators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089323</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089323</guid>
		<description>wow, 3 out of 5 about horses
Camilla zing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, 3 out of 5 about horses<br />
Camilla zing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089319</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089319</guid>
		<description>The one about Caligula is terribly wrong. Caligula had Incitatus made a senator, which outraged the senators. Nowhere in any of the ancient historical sources does it even hint at a sexual relationship between him and the racehorse.

Sounds like Mental Floss gets its information from low-budget porn films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one about Caligula is terribly wrong. Caligula had Incitatus made a senator, which outraged the senators. Nowhere in any of the ancient historical sources does it even hint at a sexual relationship between him and the racehorse.</p>
<p>Sounds like Mental Floss gets its information from low-budget porn films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempscire</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089318</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempscire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089318</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one getting a Michael Jackson vibe off Queen Charlotte? Appearance-wise, I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one getting a Michael Jackson vibe off Queen Charlotte? Appearance-wise, I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drd</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088976</link>
		<dc:creator>drd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088976</guid>
		<description>well said loaded guns. about the facts regarding shahjehan. But should appreciate the effort made by alex in getting story about royal rumors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said loaded guns. about the facts regarding shahjehan. But should appreciate the effort made by alex in getting story about royal rumors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loadedguns</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088913</link>
		<dc:creator>Loadedguns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088913</guid>
		<description>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife - Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar&#039;s son Salim&#039;s lover.

Also, the photo is not of Shahjehan. 

(wikipedia is always one-click away, you lazy fool).

Off-course I should not take you seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife &#8211; Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar&#8217;s son Salim&#8217;s lover.</p>
<p>Also, the photo is not of Shahjehan. </p>
<p>(wikipedia is always one-click away, you lazy fool).</p>
<p>Off-course I should not take you seriously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loadedguns</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088910</link>
		<dc:creator>Loadedguns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088910</guid>
		<description>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife - Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar&#039;s son Salim&#039;s lover.

Off-course I should not take you seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife &#8211; Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar&#8217;s son Salim&#8217;s lover.</p>
<p>Off-course I should not take you seriously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Manticore</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088523</link>
		<dc:creator>The Manticore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088523</guid>
		<description>Yea but Caligula eventually had Incitatus beheaded. the reason escapes me now. grr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea but Caligula eventually had Incitatus beheaded. the reason escapes me now. grr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali S.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088475</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088475</guid>
		<description>Wow.  What is with royalty and wanting to bugger anything that walks on two (or four legs!)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  What is with royalty and wanting to bugger anything that walks on two (or four legs!)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:46:49 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.151 seconds -->
