<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pain in the Royal Horse: 5 Sex Rumors About Royalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:43:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zindadil</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1279979</link>
		<dc:creator>Zindadil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1279979</guid>
		<description>thank God we dont have royalty today. Power to the People.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank God we dont have royalty today. Power to the People.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zindadil</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1279978</link>
		<dc:creator>Zindadil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1279978</guid>
		<description>This Shahjehan love affair cost the public a fortune. It was tax payer money. The poor remained poor and the rich could have all they wanted. One big monument for a stupid love.  Rumors are that the hand of the artisans who build the Taj Mahal were cut off so that no one could copy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Shahjehan love affair cost the public a fortune. It was tax payer money. The poor remained poor and the rich could have all they wanted. One big monument for a stupid love.  Rumors are that the hand of the artisans who build the Taj Mahal were cut off so that no one could copy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopalan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1188640</link>
		<dc:creator>gopalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1188640</guid>
		<description>Loadedguns, Please check again, both you and neatorama are right! Nur Jahan was the favourite wife of Jahangir; Mumtaz, the wife of Shah Jahan (son of Jahangir), the inspiration for the Taj Mahal, was the daughter of the brother of Nur Jahan. Thus, both are right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loadedguns, Please check again, both you and neatorama are right! Nur Jahan was the favourite wife of Jahangir; Mumtaz, the wife of Shah Jahan (son of Jahangir), the inspiration for the Taj Mahal, was the daughter of the brother of Nur Jahan. Thus, both are right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1095835</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1095835</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget about Prince Charles son William, and Williams half-brother Harry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't forget about Prince Charles son William, and Williams half-brother Harry...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stajduhar</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1095330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stajduhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1095330</guid>
		<description>Catherine the Great&#039;s husband was Peter III not Fredrick whoever that was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine the Great's husband was Peter III not Fredrick whoever that was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loadedguns</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089798</link>
		<dc:creator>Loadedguns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 05:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089798</guid>
		<description>Alex!
I take my words back...except one thing - we should not forget that Shah Jehan&#039;s period was one of greatest prosperity during Mughal reign in India. When you say 300 wives and 5000 concubines, it seems like a porno epic. But it is not so. In that period of instability and revolts, greatest thing which mattered was having a son. Having this &#039;janankhana&#039; or &#039;harem&#039; was a provision for bad times (the more women you have, the greater is your prestige). I wonder many of these concubines and wives even ever met Shah Jehan. Further this was a common practice in Medieval times. This fact alone is not sufficient to brand a good king Jahangir as a sex maniac [and you put him at no. 1 of all!!!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex!<br />
I take my words back...except one thing - we should not forget that Shah Jehan's period was one of greatest prosperity during Mughal reign in India. When you say 300 wives and 5000 concubines, it seems like a porno epic. But it is not so. In that period of instability and revolts, greatest thing which mattered was having a son. Having this 'janankhana' or 'harem' was a provision for bad times (the more women you have, the greater is your prestige). I wonder many of these concubines and wives even ever met Shah Jehan. Further this was a common practice in Medieval times. This fact alone is not sufficient to brand a good king Jahangir as a sex maniac [and you put him at no. 1 of all!!!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089418</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089418</guid>
		<description>Geez, Alex, you made me re-read my comment.

The position of &quot;consul&quot; is more like &quot;president&quot;. Not every senator became consul. And I was wrong - Suetonius doesn&#039;t say that he made the horse senator. Cassius Dio, who wrote may years later, says that the horse did get a priesthood, though.

My point was mostly about the alleged bestiality, which has no basis in ancient historians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, Alex, you made me re-read my comment.</p>
<p>The position of "consul" is more like "president". Not every senator became consul. And I was wrong - Suetonius doesn't say that he made the horse senator. Cassius Dio, who wrote may years later, says that the horse did get a priesthood, though.</p>
<p>My point was mostly about the alleged bestiality, which has no basis in ancient historians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089362</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089362</guid>
		<description>Loadedgun, the article is about Jahangir, the father of Prince Khurram, who later became Shah Jahan

Nur Jahan was Jahangir&#039;s favorite wife. Her niece was Mumtaz Mahal, whom Shah Jahan married and made Taj Mahal for.

Ted, Incitatus was never made consul - Roman historian Suetonius wrote that Caligula *planned* to make the horse a consul. Later, the controversy was why: a lot of people thought it was a stunt to annoy the senators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loadedgun, the article is about Jahangir, the father of Prince Khurram, who later became Shah Jahan</p>
<p>Nur Jahan was Jahangir's favorite wife. Her niece was Mumtaz Mahal, whom Shah Jahan married and made Taj Mahal for.</p>
<p>Ted, Incitatus was never made consul - Roman historian Suetonius wrote that Caligula *planned* to make the horse a consul. Later, the controversy was why: a lot of people thought it was a stunt to annoy the senators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089323</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089323</guid>
		<description>wow, 3 out of 5 about horses
Camilla zing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, 3 out of 5 about horses<br />
Camilla zing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089319</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089319</guid>
		<description>The one about Caligula is terribly wrong. Caligula had Incitatus made a senator, which outraged the senators. Nowhere in any of the ancient historical sources does it even hint at a sexual relationship between him and the racehorse.

Sounds like Mental Floss gets its information from low-budget porn films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one about Caligula is terribly wrong. Caligula had Incitatus made a senator, which outraged the senators. Nowhere in any of the ancient historical sources does it even hint at a sexual relationship between him and the racehorse.</p>
<p>Sounds like Mental Floss gets its information from low-budget porn films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempscire</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1089318</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempscire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1089318</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one getting a Michael Jackson vibe off Queen Charlotte? Appearance-wise, I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one getting a Michael Jackson vibe off Queen Charlotte? Appearance-wise, I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drd</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088976</link>
		<dc:creator>drd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088976</guid>
		<description>well said loaded guns. about the facts regarding shahjehan. But should appreciate the effort made by alex in getting story about royal rumors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said loaded guns. about the facts regarding shahjehan. But should appreciate the effort made by alex in getting story about royal rumors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loadedguns</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088913</link>
		<dc:creator>Loadedguns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088913</guid>
		<description>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife - Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar&#039;s son Salim&#039;s lover.

Also, the photo is not of Shahjehan. 

(wikipedia is always one-click away, you lazy fool).

Off-course I should not take you seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife - Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar's son Salim's lover.</p>
<p>Also, the photo is not of Shahjehan. </p>
<p>(wikipedia is always one-click away, you lazy fool).</p>
<p>Off-course I should not take you seriously...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loadedguns</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088910</link>
		<dc:creator>Loadedguns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088910</guid>
		<description>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife - Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar&#039;s son Salim&#039;s lover.

Off-course I should not take you seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check your facts before sounding knowledgeable. Shahjehan built Tajmahal for his wife - Mumtaj. This is why Taj Mahal is considered as a symbol of love. Nur Jahan was Akbar's son Salim's lover.</p>
<p>Off-course I should not take you seriously...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Manticore</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088523</link>
		<dc:creator>The Manticore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088523</guid>
		<description>Yea but Caligula eventually had Incitatus beheaded. the reason escapes me now. grr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea but Caligula eventually had Incitatus beheaded. the reason escapes me now. grr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali S.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1088475</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/16/a-pain-in-the-royal-horse-5-sex-rumors-about-royalty/#comment-1088475</guid>
		<description>Wow.  What is with royalty and wanting to bugger anything that walks on two (or four legs!)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  What is with royalty and wanting to bugger anything that walks on two (or four legs!)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/22 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-09 12:45:07 -->