<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wait, Why Is It $700 Billion Exactly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:48:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noelegy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1039253</link>
		<dc:creator>Noelegy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1039253</guid>
		<description>Well yeah, it&#039;s always easy to be generous with other people&#039;s money. I heard today that the value of the bad mortgages was around $100 billion. So where was the rest of the money going to go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yeah, it's always easy to be generous with other people's money. I heard today that the value of the bad mortgages was around $100 billion. So where was the rest of the money going to go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sw</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1037408</link>
		<dc:creator>sw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1037408</guid>
		<description>Johnny Cat,  I love your idea!  I could pay off 1.5 credit cards, a win-win for me AND the creditors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny Cat,  I love your idea!  I could pay off 1.5 credit cards, a win-win for me AND the creditors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1035002</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1035002</guid>
		<description>To clarify, there&#039;s a claim making the email rounds that if the AIG bailout was divided among the estimated 200 million taxpayers, it would be 425,000...when in fact that math was way wrong, and included 3 too many zeroes.

Also, while the 3500 bucks may not be as desirable, if each citizen got that as a check in the mail, I would think they would pour it back into their credit balances, make mortgage payments, and buy products.  The money still funnels to the rich bankers, without the temptation for them to just pocket it, and leave us debtors in the dark.  The Paulson plan is to simply hand them the cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, there's a claim making the email rounds that if the AIG bailout was divided among the estimated 200 million taxpayers, it would be 425,000...when in fact that math was way wrong, and included 3 too many zeroes.</p>
<p>Also, while the 3500 bucks may not be as desirable, if each citizen got that as a check in the mail, I would think they would pour it back into their credit balances, make mortgage payments, and buy products.  The money still funnels to the rich bankers, without the temptation for them to just pocket it, and leave us debtors in the dark.  The Paulson plan is to simply hand them the cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1034409</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1034409</guid>
		<description>Uh yeah, sorry.  That was from someone claiming the same thing on the AIG bailout.  I estimate 200 million voters divided into 7 billion to be about 3500 before tax, if they tax.  Sorry again, long day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh yeah, sorry.  That was from someone claiming the same thing on the AIG bailout.  I estimate 200 million voters divided into 7 billion to be about 3500 before tax, if they tax.  Sorry again, long day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerse</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1034404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1034404</guid>
		<description>@Cheeseduck

You are forgetting minors and foreigners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cheeseduck</p>
<p>You are forgetting minors and foreigners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheeseDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1033746</link>
		<dc:creator>CheeseDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1033746</guid>
		<description>$700,000,000,000 / 305,275,000 People in America = $2,293.01 per American

Certainly NOT $425 per VOTING American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$700,000,000,000 / 305,275,000 People in America = $2,293.01 per American</p>
<p>Certainly NOT $425 per VOTING American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xirvyg</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1033613</link>
		<dc:creator>xirvyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1033613</guid>
		<description>Johnny Cat: I don&#039;t understand, you think there are over 1.6 billion voting Americans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny Cat: I don't understand, you think there are over 1.6 billion voting Americans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1033565</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1033565</guid>
		<description>Mooncake (love your handle BTW), Hahahaha! That can&#039;t be right! If it is, it&#039;s hilarious. Like declaring 15 exemptions on your income tax, because if you declare 16, they look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mooncake (love your handle BTW), Hahahaha! That can't be right! If it is, it's hilarious. Like declaring 15 exemptions on your income tax, because if you declare 16, they look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1032214</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1032214</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done the math, and it&#039;s more like $425 per voting American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've done the math, and it's more like $425 per voting American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zephyrum</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1031888</link>
		<dc:creator>zephyrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1031888</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is, that&#039;s about $250,000 per voting American. Why don&#039;t they just split the money up among us? ^__^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is, that's about $250,000 per voting American. Why don't they just split the money up among us? ^__^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1031794</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1031794</guid>
		<description>I believe the number is actually about a trillion if you count the other smaller bailouts.  $85 billion for AIG, and $200 billion for fannie/freddie.  That puts us just at $985 billion (that we&#039;re undoubtedly borrowing ourselves).   

One thing that stuck out at the debate was that earmarks make up a total of $18 billion per year, so if we arbitrarily add that number, we can just barely top the big $1,000,000,000,000.  Hooray, US!  They say our education system sucks, but we can count reeeeeeeeaaaallly high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the number is actually about a trillion if you count the other smaller bailouts.  $85 billion for AIG, and $200 billion for fannie/freddie.  That puts us just at $985 billion (that we're undoubtedly borrowing ourselves).   </p>
<p>One thing that stuck out at the debate was that earmarks make up a total of $18 billion per year, so if we arbitrarily add that number, we can just barely top the big $1,000,000,000,000.  Hooray, US!  They say our education system sucks, but we can count reeeeeeeeaaaallly high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1031524</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1031524</guid>
		<description>TimO : d*mn! you got it before me ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TimO : d*mn! you got it before me <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtron</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1031511</link>
		<dc:creator>gtron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1031511</guid>
		<description>apparently if they chose 800 it was &quot;too close to a Trillion&quot; and wouldn&#039;t fly
it&#039;s a comedy show, and you are both the audience AND the sucker...
lay your money down!
(oh, and hurry up and give it to us! Oh, and, no, we don&#039;t want any oversight - in eight months when the whole thing tanks, we&#039;ll have funneled the money out to the rich guys again, and the country goes under</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently if they chose 800 it was "too close to a Trillion" and wouldn't fly<br />
it's a comedy show, and you are both the audience AND the sucker...<br />
lay your money down!<br />
(oh, and hurry up and give it to us! Oh, and, no, we don't want any oversight - in eight months when the whole thing tanks, we'll have funneled the money out to the rich guys again, and the country goes under</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimO</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1031462</link>
		<dc:creator>TimO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1031462</guid>
		<description>...because the number $666 Billion scared the hell out of &#039;em even more....

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...because the number $666 Billion scared the hell out of 'em even more....</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Dunham</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1030980</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1030980</guid>
		<description>You put the little finger to the side of your mouth and say the number in a portentous voice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You put the little finger to the side of your mouth and say the number in a portentous voice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoonCake</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1030518</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonCake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1030518</guid>
		<description>i could be wrong on this one, but i read that they chose $700 billion because that&#039;s the max amount allowed to be spent without being questioned by the federal reserve.. or something like that... 

even if 95% of us are questioning it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i could be wrong on this one, but i read that they chose $700 billion because that's the max amount allowed to be spent without being questioned by the federal reserve.. or something like that... </p>
<p>even if 95% of us are questioning it....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1030225</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1030225</guid>
		<description>They should use that newly discovered Mersenne prime. That would be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should use that newly discovered Mersenne prime. That would be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorFedora</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-1030137</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorFedora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/28/wait-why-is-it-700-billion-exactly/#comment-1030137</guid>
		<description>Er, eight is only a lucky number in China. In Europe-based cultures, it&#039;s seven that you&#039;re thinking of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, eight is only a lucky number in China. In Europe-based cultures, it's seven that you're thinking of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.225 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 16:49:43 -->