Comments on: 45 Beautiful Motion Blur Photos

By: Jerry

Jerry — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:40:46 +0000

There is a link at the bottom of the article to a tutorial on how to Photoshop to get these effects.

By: mustardhamsters

mustardhamsters — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:33:10 +0000

While Photoshop is neat for a lot of good things, motion blur is at its coolest when it's natural. A lot of these photos were taken by taking a long exposure followed by a flash to illuminate the detail in the image. A quick flash is the equivalent to the shutter in these dark photos.

For those of you unsure, at least the photo of the dirtbike, the blue grid third from the bottom and the gun had their woops shooped. Not even particularly well I might add. The photo of the stairs may also be shooped, definitely for color removal if not for blur. Popular vote around here says that the photo of the dice is the best image in composition and originality.

By: Wes

Wes — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:18:11 +0000

I have to apologize to linty. I followed the link to the dirtbike photo and took a better look. That particular shot is indeed manipulated. A similar effect, however, can be achieved with a zoom lens, as I mentioned. TO get it off-center, just crop.

I also took a look at some of the others, like the dog and the spinning kid. If you view the larger sizes, you'll note that the subjects aren't totally clear. The front of the dog's head is blurred, too.

By: Wes

Wes — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:08:08 +0000

I doubt the dog photo is photoshopped. It was likely taken in a car, with the dog characteristically sticking his head out the window. The blurring of the background is of course caused by the motion of the car; the blurring of the back of the dog's head is caused by his hair wildly moving in the wind. I'd guess an exposure of about 1/10 sec. or so would be enough to provide said motion blur without the dog moving his head enough to readily show blurring. The dirtbike photo, which is "almost definitely" photoshopped, almost certainly isn't, either. That effect can easily be replicated with a zoom lens. Quickly zoom in while taking the shot (manually, not with a slow P&S zoom). I've done the same thing many times. And yes, it's possible to take a picture of a blurred background and a clear subject. Exposure times needn't be incredibly long to result in motion blur. I've been a photographer for somewhere around 20 years and am really amazed at some of the simple things people call "photoshopped" on. Take some photography courses, read some photography books, study others' techniques, get some extensive hands-on experience, and repeat for many years. Or at least ask experienced photographers how an effect might be accomplished before concluding yourself that it was simply "photoshopped."

By: Namowal

Namowal — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:23:32 +0000

I suspect the dog is photoshopped. If he's moving fast enough to blur the back of his head (on film) the front half should be blurred too.

By: linty

linty — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:51:14 +0000

Haha...I'm a luck dragon!

really though, is it possible to take a picture with a clear subject and a blurred moving background, such as the kid being spun by it's arms and the grass is blurry. I would think for an exposure long enough to capture the blur there'd be no chance of taking a clear picture. Maybe some of these are photoshopped.
Almost definitely the dirtbike one is.

I liked the dice

By: Leo

Leo — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:57:11 +0000

ATREYU!!!!!!!!!

[Sorry, I couldn't help it]

By: blaze

blaze — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:23:40 +0000

While many of these are quite beautiful, they just seem like long exposures to me.... (at least the ones I like)

Great find though.