<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Ruled that Pringles Aren&#8217;t Potato Chips (For Tax Purposes, Anyhow)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lionheart</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-722019</link>
		<dc:creator>lionheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-722019</guid>
		<description>If it's not a potato chip, what is it? It's crunchy and it tastes like a potato chip. Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s not a potato chip, what is it? It&#8217;s crunchy and it tastes like a potato chip. Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skipweasel</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658347</link>
		<dc:creator>Skipweasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658347</guid>
		<description>Let's have a short primer on English usage of English...

Crisps - thin slices of potato fried in oil until crisp right through with no discernable moisture.
Chips - thick batons of potato fried in oil but retaining a moist centre.
French Fries - thin batons of potato unlike anything a proper Englishman would eat - often served in burger joints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s have a short primer on English usage of English&#8230;</p>
<p>Crisps - thin slices of potato fried in oil until crisp right through with no discernable moisture.<br />
Chips - thick batons of potato fried in oil but retaining a moist centre.<br />
French Fries - thin batons of potato unlike anything a proper Englishman would eat - often served in burger joints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shish</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658208</link>
		<dc:creator>Shish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658208</guid>
		<description>That's a very interesting article, especially this bit:

"the U.K. government was told by Europe's highest court, the European Court of Justice, to entirely refund Marks &#38; Spencer Group Plc more than 20 years of sales duty charged on chocolate-covered tea cakes."

Since the tax was 17.5%, that's no trivial amount. But Marks &#38; Spencer didn't actually PAY the tax - they just COLLECTED it from the customers and passed it on. So now they get to keep it? I suppose they deserve some reward for being one of the few organizations to impose a little humiliation on the UK's obnoxious tax collectors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very interesting article, especially this bit:</p>
<p>&#8220;the U.K. government was told by Europe&#8217;s highest court, the European Court of Justice, to entirely refund Marks &amp; Spencer Group Plc more than 20 years of sales duty charged on chocolate-covered tea cakes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since the tax was 17.5%, that&#8217;s no trivial amount. But Marks &amp; Spencer didn&#8217;t actually PAY the tax - they just COLLECTED it from the customers and passed it on. So now they get to keep it? I suppose they deserve some reward for being one of the few organizations to impose a little humiliation on the UK&#8217;s obnoxious tax collectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neatoramawontsendmeapassword</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658178</link>
		<dc:creator>Neatoramawontsendmeapassword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658178</guid>
		<description>I meant "rice flour".  That's what I get for trying to type when I'm only half awake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant &#8220;rice flour&#8221;.  That&#8217;s what I get for trying to type when I&#8217;m only half awake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neatoramawontsendmeapassword</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658177</link>
		<dc:creator>Neatoramawontsendmeapassword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658177</guid>
		<description>Doesn't anyone read ingredients anymore?  Pringles are NOT just potatoes.

From the Pringles website:

Ingredients: dried potatoes, vegetable oil (contains one or more of the following: corn oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil, and/or sunflower oil), rice flower, wheat starch, maltodextrin, salt, and dextrose.

I haven't been able to eat Pringles for years due to a wheat allergy.  I can eat regular potato chips just fine, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t anyone read ingredients anymore?  Pringles are NOT just potatoes.</p>
<p>From the Pringles website:</p>
<p>Ingredients: dried potatoes, vegetable oil (contains one or more of the following: corn oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil, and/or sunflower oil), rice flower, wheat starch, maltodextrin, salt, and dextrose.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been able to eat Pringles for years due to a wheat allergy.  I can eat regular potato chips just fine, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilla</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658150</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658150</guid>
		<description>"They also claim the snack isn't made like a chip since it is cooked from baked dough, not potato slices," 

says the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They also claim the snack isn&#8217;t made like a chip since it is cooked from baked dough, not potato slices,&#8221; </p>
<p>says the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LH</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658119</link>
		<dc:creator>LH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658119</guid>
		<description>They must be mashed potatoes molded, there´s no other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They must be mashed potatoes molded, there´s no other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-658110</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-658110</guid>
		<description>For the States, this is nothing new actually.  Many years ago (1970s), Pringles U.S. ads carried the tagline "New Fangled Potato Chip", but competitors whined and the Federal Government ruled they couldn't call them potato chips.  If you look on the can, they are currently labelled "potato crisps".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the States, this is nothing new actually.  Many years ago (1970s), Pringles U.S. ads carried the tagline &#8220;New Fangled Potato Chip&#8221;, but competitors whined and the Federal Government ruled they couldn&#8217;t call them potato chips.  If you look on the can, they are currently labelled &#8220;potato crisps&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SenorMysterioso</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-657371</link>
		<dc:creator>SenorMysterioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-657371</guid>
		<description>Im inclined to think that a potato chip has to be a slice of potato.  I think pringles are mashed up potatoes molded into the shape of a chip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im inclined to think that a potato chip has to be a slice of potato.  I think pringles are mashed up potatoes molded into the shape of a chip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/14/judge-ruled-that-pringles-arent-potato-chips-for-tax-purposes-anyhow/#comment-657092</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=17258#comment-657092</guid>
		<description>French fries are made from potatoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>French fries are made from potatoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
