E-Mail Post To A Friend
Email a copy of 'Trivia: The Five Seconds Rule' to a friend
16 comments to "Trivia: The Five Seconds Rule"
-
Tempscire
May 23rd, 2008 at
2:19 pm
Hmm. I thought there was another experiment that showed it depended on how moist the food was– an apple slice would pick up more bacteria than an M&M, say.
-
Abbey
May 23rd, 2008 at
2:24 pm
But what are the odds of salmonella or E. coli being on the surface you happen to drop your food on?
There’s many factors that go into my decision to follow the 5 second rule or not. How hungry am I and how much do I like the food that I just dropped? What sort of surface did I drop it on and is it the last one? It’s a lot to think about in just 5 seconds.
-
v.dog
May 23rd, 2008 at
3:28 pm
They could have just watched Mythbusters
-
bean
May 23rd, 2008 at
3:42 pm
The problem with these studies, including Mythbusters, is that they don’t stay true to the scenario:
The five second rule is for food that has dropped from a height, not been placed carefully on top of a bacteria smear.
-
edselpdx
May 23rd, 2008 at
3:46 pm
I would eat something after 5 seconds on my kitchen floor… but not a public bathroom floor…
Context is everything here. Even ingesting E. coli is not *necessarily* going to make you sick. And most environmental bacteria will not make you sick. Food is not sterile. -
Thomas
May 23rd, 2008 at
4:11 pm
I follow the three second rule
-
CheeseDuck
May 23rd, 2008 at
4:26 pm
I personally follow the As Long As It Isn’t Rotting Rule.
-
kurt
May 23rd, 2008 at
7:26 pm
As much as I respect High School science projects as proof of something, the method is flawed. actual floors do not have bacteria smeared on them (though any food residew left on the floor would be a fine place for bacteria to grow in the future).
-
Arjun
May 23rd, 2008 at
9:14 pm
Does anyone remember reading a number of studies somewheres which actually refuted the idea that bacteria transfer to food within a few seconds, and that it actually took really long?
-
Barbwire
May 23rd, 2008 at
10:26 pm
Some MIT students did a study, dropping things randomly in ordinary places. Most foods tested were ok after 5 or 10 seconds, and some were still fine after a much longer time on the floor/ground. I agree that placing something on a surface smeared with a concentration of bacteria will not produce accurate results.
-
Celeste
May 24th, 2008 at
3:20 am
Eh, you’re more likely to get salmonella from bagged lettuce than from a dropped Oreo. Live a little. =P
-
BikerRay
May 24th, 2008 at
5:28 am
Some of the unhealthiest people I know are the most fanatical about cleanliness; their immune system never gets any practice.
-
violet
May 24th, 2008 at
5:53 am
Yeah, it’s not so much that people follow the 5 second rule because they believe bacteria can’t get into the food in under 5 seconds; it’s just an arbitrary length of time that we feel psychologically comfortable with. The difference between “I dropped it” and “I’m foraging for scraps on the floor.”
-
Ashley
May 24th, 2008 at
12:52 pm
Another study found that people are very willing to follow the five second rule for candy, and quite unwilling for vegetables. It’s definitely psychological.
That said, it is actually good for your immune system to be challenged occasionally. They way when you DO eat contaminated lettuce, your immune system says “Big whoop, I’ve seen this before. No problem.” The chance of getting a major, knock-you-flat bacteria or virus from a surface you are familiar with (ie: not a public bathroom or cafeteria) is low.
-
Larry
May 24th, 2008 at
4:24 pm
I heard that even ancient Romans had a version of the 5 second rule, except it was the 40 second rule back then. My how times have changed.
-
Sofar
May 24th, 2008 at
6:24 pm
I’m going to go ahead and assume my floor is home to a minimum of salmenella and continue to eat stuff off of it no matter how long it’s been there. Unless it gets hair on it.
PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT









