Comments on: Flowing Pixels, a “Pixel Art” Sculpture

By: hockeygoalie5

hockeygoalie5 — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:24:56 +0000

That’s graffiti? I thought some kid was playing with chalk and a marker.

By: man!!!!!!

man!!!!!! — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:23:16 +0000

i do graffiti n all, (i do consider it art), but some dumb@$$e$ never follow its rules.(one of which is not to ruin someones else’s artwork), o n that person sucks at it by the way.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:28:08 +0000

It was prolly only ten minutes before it got tagged.

By: jessleigh

jessleigh — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:30:21 +0000

Of course it has graffiti on it. I wonder how long it was graffiti-free.

By: Zi

Zi — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:40:06 +0000

Hey, I pass by this building all the time for class! It’s really too bad someone ruined it with their graffiti sig, though. :/…

By: fsmarch

fsmarch — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:14:32 +0000

LOL @ Christophe

By: Christophe

Christophe — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:48:03 +0000

Neat!

Too bad for another brainless-dog-pee-on-his-territory-graffiti

By: the robot child

the robot child — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:49:15 +0000

being a nerd and all i think it looks amazing. Oh and someone would put graffiti on a piece of art.

You know you can’t call graffiti art when they do this. Form of expression my ass.

By: Fuzzeh

Fuzzeh — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:02:37 +0000

Kotaku has a pic without the graffiti on it:

http://kotaku.com/5006936/pixel-bit-art-spills-onto-streets-of-new-yor k

Sadly, it looks like someone pilfered the art. :/