Comments on: Homemade Coffee Printer

By: Michele

Michele — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:39:19 +0000

Oh this is stupid. Over 2 minutes to put a corporate logo on top of something that:

A- probably would not be looked at anyway
B- is just going to be ruined with a stir stick less than 2 minutes after it’s created
and C-is going to be consumed seconds after the stir stick ruination.

Stop screwing around and give me the %$@!*^# coffee already! NO TIP FOR YOU!

By: yayo

yayo — Sat, 03 May 2008 09:08:55 +0000

really?

By: Larfin Jackarse

Larfin Jackarse — Sat, 03 May 2008 09:07:09 +0000

ps: Larst and Furst in the same thread.

By: Larfin Jackarse

Larfin Jackarse — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:16:15 +0000

LOL. To explain myself…I want one because it is so just plain silly and the coffee would be cold by the time I get it. Is this a ‘Heath Robinson’ device or is that something else?

By: fsmarch

fsmarch — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:13:37 +0000

Okey dokey…

By: jessleigh

jessleigh — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:40:07 +0000

This will probably catch on, simply because no one can have anything creative and natural, it all has to be picked apart and created by something non-human. Plus, OF COURSE they used it to do a starbucks logo. Sheesh.

By: ted

ted — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:09:02 +0000

To what end?

By: pridesax

pridesax — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:03:47 +0000

I don’t really care for coffee. I do like it better when things are handmade without robotic devices though.

By: otterly

otterly — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:41:52 +0000

Can you say Millionaire?

By: Ali S.

Ali S. — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:32:33 +0000

Argh. So slow. Give me a coffee gosh darn it! *shakes caffeine trembling fist*

By: Thomas

Thomas — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:38:26 +0000

Useless as that is, I feel a personal need to defend the shamrock on the Guinness. Perhaps its just my love of Guinness, or the fact that the shamrock can be done without taking any more time than it normally takes to pour a Guinness. Either way, I’m for it.

By: SenorMysterioso

SenorMysterioso — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:05:41 +0000

In your face snooty baristas, lets see you poor a starbucks logo

By: Alannah

Alannah — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:40:18 +0000

This is something my husband would come up with. He recently turned an old brownie camera into a solar powered flashlight. Everything in our living room is from the 1940′s, just repurposed for modern day uses.

By: Viola

Viola — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:40:12 +0000

If you steam your hot chocolate milk, then I’m sure it’d be about the same. Oh, and you can’t stir it, so if you’re using powder, you’d probably have to give it an espresso-ish consistency.

I can do the little hearts, but I’m not good enough to do the flowers yet. Yay me.

By: DrJones

DrJones — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:16:03 +0000

Does it work for hot chocolate?

By: Edward

Edward — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:40:49 +0000

How can you not respect a person who wastes time and money creating frivolous robotic devices? To me this is a class of art unto itself.

By: bean

bean — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:35:39 +0000

Based on the title I was expecting a cheap and tasty solution to printer ink. Oh well.

By: cuimhne

cuimhne — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:47:01 +0000

Heh saw this a while ago an it is pretty cool…but ridiculously slow! Anyone else think that people who put art on lattes are on the same level as people who paint shamrocks into pints of Guinness? Dara O’Briaian says we’re allowed to stab them in the eye with a fork.

By: X-Shark

X-Shark — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:46:20 +0000

now Starbucks will be able to charge $30 for the same cup of coffee.

By: Larfin Jackarse

Larfin Jackarse — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:30:04 +0000

That is grouse! I want one.

Wow I am first?

Furst time I am furst.