<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Combined Ages of The Rolling Stones: 254 Years Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleX</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-505844</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-505844</guid>
		<description>For centuries people have looked for the Philosopher&#039;s Stone. It is said to turn led into gold and keeps you young. The &#039;Stones&#039; have found it! It&#039;s called &#039;Rock&#039; and Roll!
And I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For centuries people have looked for the Philosopher&#8217;s Stone. It is said to turn led into gold and keeps you young. The &#8216;Stones&#8217; have found it! It&#8217;s called &#8216;Rock&#8217; and Roll!<br />
And I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-503951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503951</guid>
		<description>People people people, don&#039;t be too smug about old folks, because your time will come, and you&#039;ll say to yourself, &quot;holy crap, how did that happen&quot;.  And it will come MUCH sooner than you think.  It&#039;s amazing how fast one&#039;s 30s and 40s go by, thankfully I still have a couple of years left in the former decade.

Congratulations Sir Mick, next year you can start collecting your gubmint pension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People people people, don&#8217;t be too smug about old folks, because your time will come, and you&#8217;ll say to yourself, &#8220;holy crap, how did that happen&#8221;.  And it will come MUCH sooner than you think.  It&#8217;s amazing how fast one&#8217;s 30s and 40s go by, thankfully I still have a couple of years left in the former decade.</p>
<p>Congratulations Sir Mick, next year you can start collecting your gubmint pension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Algonkin</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-503492</link>
		<dc:creator>Algonkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503492</guid>
		<description>The Rolling Stones:

Famous in the sixties...now IN their sixties</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rolling Stones:</p>
<p>Famous in the sixties&#8230;now IN their sixties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JET</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-503240</link>
		<dc:creator>JET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503240</guid>
		<description>What I find amazing is the number of combined man hours they&#039;ve spent endlessly recycling and regurgitating the same old tropes and figures over and over, nary once finding a spark of innovation or daring to transcend any boundaries.

Easily one of the most overrated entities in modern culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find amazing is the number of combined man hours they&#8217;ve spent endlessly recycling and regurgitating the same old tropes and figures over and over, nary once finding a spark of innovation or daring to transcend any boundaries.</p>
<p>Easily one of the most overrated entities in modern culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeris</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-502627</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502627</guid>
		<description>huh: you forgot another 60: &quot;and Ronnie Wood (June 1, 1947): 60.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh: you forgot another 60: &#8220;and Ronnie Wood (June 1, 1947): 60.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew L</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-502466</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502466</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks!! The legendary Rolling Stones made it to Neatorama at last! They&#039;ve been my favourite rock &amp; roll band since they started off playing rhythm &amp; blues in small dinghy clubs back in the early Sixties &amp; I still have some of their early vinyl LP recordings in my collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks!! The legendary Rolling Stones made it to Neatorama at last! They&#8217;ve been my favourite rock &amp; roll band since they started off playing rhythm &amp; blues in small dinghy clubs back in the early Sixties &amp; I still have some of their early vinyl LP recordings in my collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-502163</link>
		<dc:creator>huh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502163</guid>
		<description>64+64+66=254 ?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>64+64+66=254 ?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleX</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501987</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501987</guid>
		<description>and if the Pope played keyboard it would be 324 years combined...interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if the Pope played keyboard it would be 324 years combined&#8230;interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeris</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501925</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501925</guid>
		<description>mhhhkay. They&#039;re the rock dinosaurs, but i wouldnt consider this a particularly &quot;neat&quot; fact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mhhhkay. They&#8217;re the rock dinosaurs, but i wouldnt consider this a particularly &#8220;neat&#8221; fact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501855</guid>
		<description>And if Bill Wyman was still with them he&#039;d add another 71 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if Bill Wyman was still with them he&#8217;d add another 71 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Morey</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501842</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501842</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s your point, punk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your point, punk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501805</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501805</guid>
		<description>Combined Ages of The Red Army Choir: 16800 Years Old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combined Ages of The Red Army Choir: 16800 Years Old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheeseDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501796</link>
		<dc:creator>CheeseDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501796</guid>
		<description>They are old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SenorMysterioso</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501732</link>
		<dc:creator>SenorMysterioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501732</guid>
		<description>Keith is only 64?!  I would have guessed about 90</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith is only 64?!  I would have guessed about 90</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501721</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501721</guid>
		<description>We did - but don&#039;t worry, there&#039;s a built in mechanism to discount frequent but nonsensical comments. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did &#8211; but don&#8217;t worry, there&#8217;s a built in mechanism to discount frequent but nonsensical comments. <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501646</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501646</guid>
		<description>BTW, why leave 2 comments on something you don&#039;t care about?  Seems odd.  Or did they just give away prizes the other day for top commenters...  curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, why leave 2 comments on something you don&#8217;t care about?  Seems odd.  Or did they just give away prizes the other day for top commenters&#8230;  curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-501618</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501618</guid>
		<description>come on...  another few years and they&#039;ll collectively catch up with Ronnie James Dio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come on&#8230;  another few years and they&#8217;ll collectively catch up with Ronnie James Dio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:08:35 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1274 seconds -->
