<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Combined Ages of The Rolling Stones: 254 Years Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tripleX</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-505844</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-505844</guid>
		<description>For centuries people have looked for the Philosopher's Stone. It is said to turn led into gold and keeps you young. The 'Stones' have found it! It's called 'Rock' and Roll!
And I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For centuries people have looked for the Philosopher&#8217;s Stone. It is said to turn led into gold and keeps you young. The &#8216;Stones&#8217; have found it! It&#8217;s called &#8216;Rock&#8217; and Roll!<br />
And I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503951</guid>
		<description>People people people, don't be too smug about old folks, because your time will come, and you'll say to yourself, "holy crap, how did that happen".  And it will come MUCH sooner than you think.  It's amazing how fast one's 30s and 40s go by, thankfully I still have a couple of years left in the former decade.

Congratulations Sir Mick, next year you can start collecting your gubmint pension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People people people, don&#8217;t be too smug about old folks, because your time will come, and you&#8217;ll say to yourself, &#8220;holy crap, how did that happen&#8221;.  And it will come MUCH sooner than you think.  It&#8217;s amazing how fast one&#8217;s 30s and 40s go by, thankfully I still have a couple of years left in the former decade.</p>
<p>Congratulations Sir Mick, next year you can start collecting your gubmint pension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Algonkin</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503492</link>
		<dc:creator>Algonkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503492</guid>
		<description>The Rolling Stones:

Famous in the sixties...now IN their sixties</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rolling Stones:</p>
<p>Famous in the sixties&#8230;now IN their sixties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JET</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503240</link>
		<dc:creator>JET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-503240</guid>
		<description>What I find amazing is the number of combined man hours they've spent endlessly recycling and regurgitating the same old tropes and figures over and over, nary once finding a spark of innovation or daring to transcend any boundaries.

Easily one of the most overrated entities in modern culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find amazing is the number of combined man hours they&#8217;ve spent endlessly recycling and regurgitating the same old tropes and figures over and over, nary once finding a spark of innovation or daring to transcend any boundaries.</p>
<p>Easily one of the most overrated entities in modern culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeris</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502627</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502627</guid>
		<description>huh: you forgot another 60: "and Ronnie Wood (June 1, 1947): 60."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh: you forgot another 60: &#8220;and Ronnie Wood (June 1, 1947): 60.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew L</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502466</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502466</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks!! The legendary Rolling Stones made it to Neatorama at last! They've been my favourite rock &#38; roll band since they started off playing rhythm &#38; blues in small dinghy clubs back in the early Sixties &#38; I still have some of their early vinyl LP recordings in my collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks!! The legendary Rolling Stones made it to Neatorama at last! They&#8217;ve been my favourite rock &amp; roll band since they started off playing rhythm &amp; blues in small dinghy clubs back in the early Sixties &amp; I still have some of their early vinyl LP recordings in my collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502163</link>
		<dc:creator>huh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-502163</guid>
		<description>64+64+66=254 ?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>64+64+66=254 ?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleX</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501987</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501987</guid>
		<description>and if the Pope played keyboard it would be 324 years combined...interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if the Pope played keyboard it would be 324 years combined&#8230;interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeris</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501925</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501925</guid>
		<description>mhhhkay. They're the rock dinosaurs, but i wouldnt consider this a particularly "neat" fact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mhhhkay. They&#8217;re the rock dinosaurs, but i wouldnt consider this a particularly &#8220;neat&#8221; fact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501855</guid>
		<description>And if Bill Wyman was still with them he'd add another 71 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if Bill Wyman was still with them he&#8217;d add another 71 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Morey</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501842</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501842</guid>
		<description>What's your point, punk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your point, punk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501805</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501805</guid>
		<description>Combined Ages of The Red Army Choir: 16800 Years Old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combined Ages of The Red Army Choir: 16800 Years Old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheeseDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501796</link>
		<dc:creator>CheeseDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501796</guid>
		<description>They are old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SenorMysterioso</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501732</link>
		<dc:creator>SenorMysterioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501732</guid>
		<description>Keith is only 64?!  I would have guessed about 90</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith is only 64?!  I would have guessed about 90</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501721</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501721</guid>
		<description>We did - but don't worry, there's a built in mechanism to discount frequent but nonsensical comments. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did - but don&#8217;t worry, there&#8217;s a built in mechanism to discount frequent but nonsensical comments. <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501646</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501646</guid>
		<description>BTW, why leave 2 comments on something you don't care about?  Seems odd.  Or did they just give away prizes the other day for top commenters...  curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, why leave 2 comments on something you don&#8217;t care about?  Seems odd.  Or did they just give away prizes the other day for top commenters&#8230;  curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501618</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/04/05/combined-ages-of-the-rolling-stones-254-years-old/#comment-501618</guid>
		<description>come on...  another few years and they'll collectively catch up with Ronnie James Dio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come on&#8230;  another few years and they&#8217;ll collectively catch up with Ronnie James Dio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
