<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extreme and Modern Beds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/19/extreme-and-modern-beds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/19/extreme-and-modern-beds/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:41:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MoonCake</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/19/extreme-and-modern-beds/comment-page-1/#comment-485609</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonCake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/19/extreme-and-modern-beds/#comment-485609</guid>
		<description>am i the only person that seems to be disturbed by the fact that the majority of those beds had a tv attached to it? it doesn&#039;t make it unique and artistic by strapping your typical flatscreen to the foot of your bed. not exactly an advocate of watching tv in bed anyway. bed is for sleeping, living room is for living (which usually includes watching tv). otherwise, they were kinda cool. the round bed that splits in the middle would be somewhat of a nuisance because while you&#039;re sleeping, your butt will push the halves apart, unless the couch is heavy enough to stay-put on the floor. and the iBed is just ridiculous and impractical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i the only person that seems to be disturbed by the fact that the majority of those beds had a tv attached to it? it doesn't make it unique and artistic by strapping your typical flatscreen to the foot of your bed. not exactly an advocate of watching tv in bed anyway. bed is for sleeping, living room is for living (which usually includes watching tv). otherwise, they were kinda cool. the round bed that splits in the middle would be somewhat of a nuisance because while you're sleeping, your butt will push the halves apart, unless the couch is heavy enough to stay-put on the floor. and the iBed is just ridiculous and impractical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparge</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/19/extreme-and-modern-beds/comment-page-1/#comment-484730</link>
		<dc:creator>sparge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/19/extreme-and-modern-beds/#comment-484730</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know... there are some neat designs, but most of these look incredibly uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know... there are some neat designs, but most of these look incredibly uncomfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-09 16:49:30 -->