E-Mail Post To A Friend

Email a copy of 'Hard-Line Hindus Protest Against Valentine's Day' to a friend

* Required Field

Your Name: *

Your E-Mail: *

Your Remark:

Friend's Name: *

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.

Friend's E-Mail: *

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.

Image Verification: *

 Loading ...

1. emptyminded
   February 15th, 2008 at 8:24 am

   Again, one group of people forcing their beliefs on another through threat of harm. But what separates this case from that in Saudi Arabia is the fact that the government is not sponsoring the aggressors and in fact are taking steps to keep the aggressors from inflicting their petty rule opon the populace.

2. Ali S.
   February 15th, 2008 at 8:50 am

   You’d be amazed at how extreme people can be when they hate V-Day. Jeez! If you don’t like it…DON’T celebrate it! Bah!

3. Melissa
   February 15th, 2008 at 12:13 pm

   It’s not just about Valentine’s Day itself for the Indian extremists. It’s about opposing the westernized view of romantic love. Traditionally, romantic love plays a drastically different role in India than in America. Here, we choose a mate who appeals to us, flirt and date and get all mushy and fall in love and get married. There, marriage is often arranged and more of a financial and family tie arrangement than a romantic thing. Valentines focuses on Western style romantic love and expression rather than tradition. It’s not like the anti-valentines sentiment here in America where it’s just bitter single people and divorced people and cheap people and people who just like to complain about anything that makes other people happy that don’t like the holiday.

4. Lasse
   February 16th, 2008 at 1:18 pm

   This just shows that human stupidity isnt limited to any particular religion.

5. Marmitor III
   February 17th, 2008 at 11:57 pm

   And this coming from the land of Kamasutra and temples whose facades are covered with statues doing EVERYTHING.

6. Nicholas Dollak
   February 18th, 2008 at 8:32 am

   #3 (Melissa) pretty much bopped it on the nose. Marriage in India is still for the most part a business transaction. While this has several up-sides, it has down-sides, too. The same goes for romantic love. Part of me would like to blame the promiscuity of Indian men on this — except that promiscuity is a problem in the West as well, so apparently promiscuity stems from an unrelated cause.

   I have noticed that many Indians and Bangladeshi I know are either profoundly ignorant of pregnancy or in a state of extreme denial, as if babies were somehow something to be ashamed of. My guess is that these violent protests are a case of “the lady doth protest too much.” The protesters know that promiscuity happens in India, and rather than accept that it’s a common problem that could perhaps be solved by honest, open communication, they treat it as though it’s an alien thing and blame it on “the West.” In the absence of “western” influences, they’d blame it on someone else.

   This seems to hold true anywhere in the world, wherever counterproductive violent opposition occurs.

   Where’s the Kama, people? (Hindu deity of Love, like Eros or Cupid)

   They would do well to remember a couple of romantic lovers from Hindu folklore, whose stories portray them as true & virtuous. The story of Savitri is one: She flees to the forest to escape a prophecy that her husband, should she marry, will die after a single year. She meets a handsome young woodcutter there and falls in love anyway. He dies after a year, but she refuses to stop following Yama (Death) when he takes her husband’s soul. Yama takes pity on her and grants her three wishes (provided that “restore my husband to life” is not one of them). Her 3rd wish is to have many children, so Yama promises that this will happen. Having secured that boon, Savitri reminds Yama that a Hindu woman may marry only once. Yama tells her, “In this way do the gods enjoy being defeated,” and restores her husband to life, breaking the curse.

   The other story I had in mind concerns a “forbidden love” between a man and woman of different castes. As the hapless couple is being dragged off to be immolated for this transgression, the woman compares the burning of bodies to the burning of wood for incense. She points out that although certain woods smell better than others when burnt, the bodies of a Brahmin and an Untouchable smell alike. (Not exactly iron-clad logic, but neither is the basis of the caste system either. In the story, it works.)

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT