Comments on: Zooplankton in a Drop of Water http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/ The Neat Side of the Web Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:22:56 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Chad Cloman http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/comment-page-1/#comment-424733 Chad Cloman Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:53:08 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/#comment-424733 Don't get the head of a pin confused with the eye of a needle. What we see in that picture above is not a pinhead. Don't get the head of a pin confused with the eye of a needle. What we see in that picture above is not a pinhead.

]]> By: Amy http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/comment-page-1/#comment-424005 Amy Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:32:06 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/#comment-424005 Pretty Cool. Cant wait to show the kids and change there perspective of spongbob. Pretty Cool. Cant wait to show the kids and change there perspective of spongbob.

]]> By: sparge http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/comment-page-1/#comment-423841 sparge Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:34:27 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/30/zooplankton-in-a-drop-of-water/#comment-423841 Some of these are pretty cool, but some of them look like the sort of thing that goes into biological journals all the time. And one of them is just a kaleidoscopic picture of a dragonfly. Also, since technical relevance is part of the judging, you'd think they would include some description of the images -- especially the grand prize winner. Personally, I wasn't particularly struck by the image, but if you gave be a taste of the science behind it, I may be better able to appreciate it. Some of these are pretty cool, but some of them look like the sort of thing that goes into biological journals all the time. And one of them is just a kaleidoscopic picture of a dragonfly.

Also, since technical relevance is part of the judging, you'd think they would include some description of the images -- especially the grand prize winner. Personally, I wasn't particularly struck by the image, but if you gave be a taste of the science behind it, I may be better able to appreciate it.

]]>