E-Mail Post To A Friend

Email a copy of 'Shoe Pants or Pants Shoes?' to a friend

* Required Field

Your Name: *

Your E-Mail: *

Your Remark:

Friend's Name: *

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.

Friend's E-Mail: *

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.

Image Verification: *

 Loading ...

1. PJ
   January 30th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

   After a survey of the house with education levels ranging from highschool dropout to masters, pants.

2. Lisa
   January 30th, 2008 at 12:37 pm

   So what happens everytime you want to enter or leave the (no wearing shoes allowed inside of the) home?

3. Lea
   January 30th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

   This could pose a problem in Japan.

   And they look pretty uncomfortable.

4. Miss Cellania
   January 30th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

   Whatever they are, don’t break a string! I’d hate to have to relace them.

5. katie
   January 30th, 2008 at 1:33 pm

   In the ’60’s there were some very awesome mod go-go boots/tights varieties - I love the update!

6. Bailey
   January 30th, 2008 at 1:44 pm

   What do you do if you have a pebble in your shoe/pants??

7. czeltic girl
   January 30th, 2008 at 1:44 pm

   Reminds me of those footie pajamas little kids wear (but far more complicated).

8. Leyla
   January 30th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

   I want them!

   (But in silver or black.)

9. hifidigitalboy
   January 30th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

   I’ll bet these pants are a pain when going to the restroom.

10. munky
    January 30th, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    I hereby name these — Shants!

    Well, s’better than the alternative — Poos…

11. Sid Morrison
    January 30th, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    The store would need to stock a LOT of sizes to get all the permutations of waist, inseam, and shoe size covered! Wow… Definitely a custom made sort of thing and not practical for real-world marketing….

12. michael
    January 30th, 2008 at 4:57 pm

    Shoes or pants?

    There is an answer. It depends on where they placed the “Chuck Taylor All Star” badge.

13. anonymouse
    January 30th, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    The answer is in the name: “Converse Extension”. It’s shoes.

14. Ali S.
    January 30th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    These are really cool looking, however, I’d be a tad peeved in the morning having to lace those bad boys up. Unless you oil yourself into already tightened “Shants” as Munky has named them.

15. DCer
    January 30th, 2008 at 9:11 pm

    I remember these from the early 1980s. The girlfriend of the guy who worked at the skateboard shop had these, she had a beehive hairdoo and popped gum all the time. I think she wished she was Debbie Harry. Seeing these again really takes me back to 1981-1982.

16. ECA
    January 30th, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    1 day to lace up…
    2 days to Take off.

17. Christophe
    January 30th, 2008 at 10:18 pm

    I vote for shoes. It’s much more fun to go pantless than shoeless.

    If you wear them, don’t go in a mosque.

    And I hope you like preleminaries…

18. LHR
    January 31st, 2008 at 2:17 am

    Pants? I don’t see any Pants? That’s supposed to be underwear?

    You mean TROUSERS?

19. Alex
    January 31st, 2008 at 3:34 am

    @LHR: pants = trousers for us Yanks.

20. robingal1
    January 31st, 2008 at 9:27 am

    They’re “Booties”. Get it?
    Booties ’cause they’re like boots, and Booties ’cause they cover your bootie.

21. amberae
    February 1st, 2008 at 12:23 am

    i’m going to try and recreate a pair of these for myself… i need some. as far as comfort goes, i don’t think there’s much trouble, they look to made out of the same stuff sweats are made of. lol, if you have to pee, pull them down like pants, it’s not like they’re overalls.

22. Maia
    June 27th, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    i want some of these

23. Nintygirl
    July 8th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    They look awesome to me.. I might even try to make a pair myself!

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT