<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glamour Mug Shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-418872</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/#comment-418872</guid>
		<description>Oh, that would be logical wouldn&#039;t it, Scott? Thanks for catching that. I&#039;ve switched the pics (hopefully it&#039;ll be propagated through Neatorama&#039;s image cache system).

And that&#039;s an interesting thought: making mug shots out of glamour pics, though I&#039;m sure with many of today&#039;s celebrities, all you have to do is just wait till they run afoul of the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that would be logical wouldn&#8217;t it, Scott? Thanks for catching that. I&#8217;ve switched the pics (hopefully it&#8217;ll be propagated through Neatorama&#8217;s image cache system).</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s an interesting thought: making mug shots out of glamour pics, though I&#8217;m sure with many of today&#8217;s celebrities, all you have to do is just wait till they run afoul of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-418598</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/#comment-418598</guid>
		<description>I agree, it would be more fun in the reverse. OR take regular mugshots of regular criminals and give them the glamour treatment. As it is here, we&#039;ve already seen these folks looking glamourous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it would be more fun in the reverse. OR take regular mugshots of regular criminals and give them the glamour treatment. As it is here, we&#8217;ve already seen these folks looking glamourous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wetterschneider</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-418469</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wetterschneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/27/glamour-mug-shots/#comment-418469</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s confusing, but those before and after shots are switched. I was far more excited by the prospect of taking a glamor shot and making a mug shot out of it. Adding detail and texture is more difficult than airbrushing the dooky out of something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s confusing, but those before and after shots are switched. I was far more excited by the prospect of taking a glamor shot and making a mug shot out of it. Adding detail and texture is more difficult than airbrushing the dooky out of something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:03:57 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0581 seconds -->
