Comments on: Bubblegum Sequencer http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/ The Neat Side of the Web Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:28:37 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: johan http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/comment-page-1/#comment-405938 johan Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:03:20 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/#comment-405938 same idea, done better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wreP8FMupyM same idea, done better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wreP8FMupyM

]]> By: petra http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/comment-page-1/#comment-405238 petra Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:35:48 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/#comment-405238 seriously? i have studied music for the last 29 years, and trust me: i am totally open to new,avant-garde, unthought-of, heretofore unknown styles of music. but this just sucked. get yourself a circle of fifths for crissakes. and the narrator clearly knows not from common time or cut time or syncopation. what happens if you want 9/5 "gumball" time? are you screwed? poor dave brubeck...he's fah-cahc-ta'd. Phonetically speaking, of course. seriously?

i have studied music for the last 29 years, and trust me: i am totally open to new,avant-garde, unthought-of, heretofore unknown styles of music.

but this just sucked. get yourself a circle of fifths for crissakes. and the narrator clearly knows not from common time or cut time or syncopation. what happens if you want 9/5 "gumball" time? are you screwed? poor dave brubeck...he's fah-cahc-ta'd. Phonetically speaking, of course.

]]> By: avraamov http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/comment-page-1/#comment-404704 avraamov Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:51:52 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/19/bubblegum-sequencer/#comment-404704 chipboard! Yuk! chipboard! Yuk!

]]>