Clinton, McCain Won New Hampshire Primaries

Posted by Alex in Politics on January 9, 2008 at 3:37 am


It was a nailbiter for Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, but she finally beat Barack Obama in the New Hampshire primary. According to polls (and pundits), Clinton was trailing Obama as much as 10% as late as the even of the primary:

In Iowa, Clinton lost out to Obama among women 35 percent to 30 percent. In New Hampshire, however, 45 percent of female Democratic primary voters picked Clinton, compared to 36 percent who went for Obama.

Older voters also overwhelmingly outnumbered younger voters, a proportion that benefited Clinton. Sixty-seven percent of Democratic primary voters were over the age of 40, and they were breaking heavily for Clinton over Obama.

On the Republican side, John McCain handily beat his closest rival Mitt Romney even though before the primaries, Romney had been leading in the polls (just like the situation Clinton was in).

Link: CNN article

Trivia: I just found out that Mitt Romney’s first name is Willard, named after Willard Marriott (of the hotel fame!). "Mitt" comes from Milton Romney, who played quarterback for the Chicago Bears in the 1920s.



Previous post
this post? Please email this            
Next post

FROM THE NEATORAMA ONLINE STORE » more



COMMENT

9 comments to "Clinton, McCain Won New Hampshire Primaries"

  1. Johnald_Chaffinch
    January 9th, 2008 at 8:58 am

    rigged, no question.

  2. Anthony
    January 9th, 2008 at 9:03 am

    Ride the Obama train to President town!

  3. johnk
    January 9th, 2008 at 9:21 am

    This smells real funny.

    Either rigged, or people believed President Clinton’s speach full of lies about Obama, taking his quotes out of context.

    The Clintons need to hang it up and go the philanthropic route. Make way for the new generation of democrats the everyday American can relate to.

    Obama/Webb 08!!

  4. mindysan
    January 9th, 2008 at 10:10 am

    FYI- Andrew Sullivan, who is a big Obama supporter, shows that Obama actually got one more delegate than Clinton got in NH, and as that is what matters, he technically won:
    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/obama-act ually.html

    That being said, Hilary has a total of 183 vs Obama’s 78 as she has more Superdelegates, which are handed out in some way outside the caucus/primary system- if anyone understands how they arrive at the number of superdelegates promised and if that # can be changed, let me know. I think this will come down to the wire on the democratic side, frankly. Delegates score card is up at CNN:

    http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D

    Mindysan

  5. Anthony
    January 9th, 2008 at 10:11 am

    Oh yeah, the candidate I supported didn’t win. IT MUST HAVE BEEN RIGGED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CLINTON AND THE (space) ALIENS STOLE THE VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Since you can’t see my face I’m rolling my eyes at you, John K.

  6. Josh
    January 9th, 2008 at 11:39 am

    Clinton cries in a video and gets more votes. People really need to learn who they are voting for.

  7. Cindy
    January 9th, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    Um, you can drive into new Hampshire, tell them you intend on “living there, someday” and get a ballot to vote…at as many precincts as you would like.

    They ran out of Democrat ballots by 2 p.m. in most areas.

    Can’t wait for the Presidential election.

  8. VonSkippy
    January 9th, 2008 at 9:17 pm

    Isn’t McCain like 112 years old or something close to that?

    Did I miss the memo where they actually made the Futurama “head in a jar” thing a reality?

  9. Rob
    January 10th, 2008 at 1:18 am

    We really don’t know who won that primary and probably never will. Why? 81% of the votes were cast on old Diebold machines. You can (and probably should) watch them (these exact same machines) being hacked on YouTube.
    It takes about a minute or two.
    I don’t blame people like Anthony (above) for wanting to hide their heads in the sand. It’s a very scary thing to face up to.
    Whenever we hear the words like “surprise” and “unexpected upset” in an election with electronic voting machines and no paper trail it’s time to take a closer look.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS