<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perception of Labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-346706</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/#comment-346706</guid>
		<description>The way the questions were worded, it is clear they are asking about the character&#039;s &quot;outside work&quot;. The participants weren&#039;t expected to include housework. But those who are telecommuters suffer from the perception that they don&#039;t work as many hours at their jobs when they are labeled as a SAHM or SAHD. The label itself seems to imply that the worker was &quot;at home&quot; because of the kids, not because it&#039;s a job they CAN do from home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the questions were worded, it is clear they are asking about the character&#8217;s &#8220;outside work&#8221;. The participants weren&#8217;t expected to include housework. But those who are telecommuters suffer from the perception that they don&#8217;t work as many hours at their jobs when they are labeled as a SAHM or SAHD. The label itself seems to imply that the worker was &#8220;at home&#8221; because of the kids, not because it&#8217;s a job they CAN do from home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Labombard</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-346689</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Labombard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/#comment-346689</guid>
		<description>Apparently the people in the test assumed &#039;work&#039; as having outside employment, which isn&#039;t an uncommon assumption in the United States and probably also not uncommon in the rest of the westernized world.  Take the same test to a different culture and you&#039;ll probably get a different result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the people in the test assumed &#8216;work&#8217; as having outside employment, which isn&#8217;t an uncommon assumption in the United States and probably also not uncommon in the rest of the westernized world.  Take the same test to a different culture and you&#8217;ll probably get a different result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmers</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-346494</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/15/perception-of-labels/#comment-346494</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t there a study a while ago that said that if stay at home mothers got paid proportional to the work they did, they&#039;d be six-figure earners?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a study a while ago that said that if stay at home mothers got paid proportional to the work they did, they&#8217;d be six-figure earners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:58:06 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1148 seconds -->
