Comments on: Toys NOT for Tots. http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/ The Neat Side of the Web Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:43:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Alex http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328755 Alex Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:34:44 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328755 Aaargh! What has been seen cannot be unseen! Aaargh! What has been seen cannot be unseen!

]]> By: Chris W http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328558 Chris W Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:48:00 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328558 I also just realised the doll on the left also looks like it could be one of those dolls that goes "for a pee". So we have a hermaphroditic doll, that pees, on a BBQ, next to a power lead. Never thought I'd say all them in same sentence!! lol I also just realised the doll on the left also looks like it could be one of those dolls that goes “for a pee”.

So we have a hermaphroditic doll, that pees, on a BBQ, next to a power lead. Never thought I’d say all them in same sentence!! lol

]]> By: Nastia http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328504 Nastia Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:56:21 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328504 Actually those toys were made in China, and there was an outrage in Russia about this, the picture on the right is from a newspaper article. They speculated that the Chinese were trying to confuse Russian children or something. Actually those toys were made in China, and there was an outrage in Russia about this, the picture on the right is from a newspaper article. They speculated that the Chinese were trying to confuse Russian children or something.

]]> By: k http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328486 k Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:10:20 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328486 lol that <i>is</i> confusing. lol that is confusing.

]]> By: Chris W http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328457 Chris W Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:25:08 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328457 Why is the doll on the left, on top of a BBQ or something, with a power lead to her left? man that's just an accident waiting to happen! Why is the doll on the left, on top of a BBQ or something, with a power lead to her left? man that’s just an accident waiting to happen!

]]> By: Jacki http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328451 Jacki Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:00:00 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328451 Whoever designed those dolls has never seen a female before. Whoever designed those dolls has never seen a female before.

]]> By: Chad http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328416 Chad Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:17:59 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328416 oh come on! who DOESN'T want a teddy bear launcher?? (#2) oh come on! who DOESN’T want a teddy bear launcher?? (#2)

]]> By: Skipweasel http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328410 Skipweasel Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:14:11 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328410 In what way is it hermaphrodite? My ten year old son's got hair half way down his back (he gets teased at school, but only by the girls - I think they're jealous), but trust me, he's all boy. Our local play group and our nursery all had dolls with all the bits - the kids just took it in their stride. It's not as if it's any great surprise to a child! In what way is it hermaphrodite? My ten year old son’s got hair half way down his back (he gets teased at school, but only by the girls – I think they’re jealous), but trust me, he’s all boy.

Our local play group and our nursery all had dolls with all the bits – the kids just took it in their stride. It’s not as if it’s any great surprise to a child!

]]> By: Chris http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328390 Chris Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:37:26 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328390 Heard about those old CCCP stories (urban legends?) about Russian shoe factories : they would produce the left shoe in one factory, the right shoe in another. The resulting difference in production quality and output was nightmarish. Seems that they're onto the toy market nowadays... Heard about those old CCCP stories (urban legends?) about Russian shoe factories : they would produce the left shoe in one factory, the right shoe in another. The resulting difference in production quality and output was nightmarish.

Seems that they’re onto the toy market nowadays…

]]> By: woowoo http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328378 woowoo Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:19:56 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328378 gender and sexuality are fluid. gender-less dolls are more confusing in my opinion, it's like keeping natural anatomy a dirty secret from children. gender and sexuality are fluid. gender-less dolls are more confusing in my opinion, it’s like keeping natural anatomy a dirty secret from children.

]]> By: biltmore http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328368 biltmore Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:09:36 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328368 Hermaphroditic? I don't see any girl parts. Just a young boy dressed up like a girl. Hermaphroditic? I don’t see any girl parts. Just a young boy dressed up like a girl.

]]> By: Paradigm http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328355 Paradigm Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:35:46 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328355 Clearly its two boy dolls - you bigot ; ) Clearly its two boy dolls – you bigot ; )

]]> By: atalanta0jess http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328349 atalanta0jess Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:22:08 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328349 I don't really see any "girl parts" on the doll. Unless hair is considered a girl-part these days... I don’t really see any “girl parts” on the doll. Unless hair is considered a girl-part these days…

]]> By: lori http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328274 lori Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:19:50 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328274 Look- it's Baby Carson Kressley!!! Look- it’s Baby Carson Kressley!!!

]]> By: lori http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/comment-page-1/#comment-328272 lori Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:18:44 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/02/toys-not-for-tots/#comment-328272 Look- it's Baby Carson Kressley!! Look- it’s Baby Carson Kressley!!

]]>