<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Warhead Cozy by Elizabeth Demaray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ROGER COTE'</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-365885</link>
		<dc:creator>ROGER COTE'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-365885</guid>
		<description>WHAT IS PICTURED IS THE BODY OF THE NIKE HERCULES MISSLE, THE FRONT PART IS THE GUIDENCE SYSTEM NEXT WOULD BE THE WARHEAD WHICH COULD BE A HIGH EXPLOSIVE OR A NUCLEAR WARHEAD FOLLOWED BY THE ROCKET MOTOR.

NUCLEAR WARHEADS WERE COLOR CODED WITH A GREEN OR RED STRIPE. THE HIGH EXPLOSIVE WARHEADS HAD A YELLOW YELLOW STRIPE. ALSO THE NUCLEAR WARHEADS HAD A DIFFERENT NOSE PIECE CALLED A BARO PROBE WHICH WAS BLACK IN COLOR. THE HIGH EXPLOSIVE WARHEADS HAD THE REGULAR NOSE PIECE AS PICTURED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT IS PICTURED IS THE BODY OF THE NIKE HERCULES MISSLE, THE FRONT PART IS THE GUIDENCE SYSTEM NEXT WOULD BE THE WARHEAD WHICH COULD BE A HIGH EXPLOSIVE OR A NUCLEAR WARHEAD FOLLOWED BY THE ROCKET MOTOR.</p>
<p>NUCLEAR WARHEADS WERE COLOR CODED WITH A GREEN OR RED STRIPE. THE HIGH EXPLOSIVE WARHEADS HAD A YELLOW YELLOW STRIPE. ALSO THE NUCLEAR WARHEADS HAD A DIFFERENT NOSE PIECE CALLED A BARO PROBE WHICH WAS BLACK IN COLOR. THE HIGH EXPLOSIVE WARHEADS HAD THE REGULAR NOSE PIECE AS PICTURED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326325</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326325</guid>
		<description>yep... I just got the link to finally work... must have been too many Neatorama readers headed there at once. It's at Headlands Historic Missle Site near San Francisco.  She calls them "warheads" too, but that's only because she is an "artist".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep&#8230; I just got the link to finally work&#8230; must have been too many Neatorama readers headed there at once. It&#8217;s at Headlands Historic Missle Site near San Francisco.  She calls them &#8220;warheads&#8221; too, but that&#8217;s only because she is an &#8220;artist&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326315</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326315</guid>
		<description>Not too pick too small a nit, but the Nike-Hercules was the missle which could (optionally) *carry* a nuclear warhead (model W31 typically), not the warhead itself. While they could be used as a short range nuclear ground-ground system, they were probably much more frequently fitted with conventional payloads (fragmentary explosive) and used for surface-air defense -- taking out Russian bombers or even incoming missles. In this role, it's been replaced by the Patriot system, which is a lot more portable.

The ones shown here are probably museum pieces as I'm pretty sure they've been deactivated.  Maybe a retired military guy can comment more on the specifics of the ones shown here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too pick too small a nit, but the Nike-Hercules was the missle which could (optionally) *carry* a nuclear warhead (model W31 typically), not the warhead itself. While they could be used as a short range nuclear ground-ground system, they were probably much more frequently fitted with conventional payloads (fragmentary explosive) and used for surface-air defense &#8212; taking out Russian bombers or even incoming missles. In this role, it&#8217;s been replaced by the Patriot system, which is a lot more portable.</p>
<p>The ones shown here are probably museum pieces as I&#8217;m pretty sure they&#8217;ve been deactivated.  Maybe a retired military guy can comment more on the specifics of the ones shown here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Non.E.Mous</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326091</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Non.E.Mous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326091</guid>
		<description>Great, when this thing is actually needed it will spiral off course and land who knows where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, when this thing is actually needed it will spiral off course and land who knows where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326046</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/30/nuclear-warhead-cozy-by-elizabeth-demaray/#comment-326046</guid>
		<description>This must be some kind of Christos-type art. How many objects get a "cozy"? Teapots. That's it.

The "Gates" in Central Park were better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This must be some kind of Christos-type art. How many objects get a &#8220;cozy&#8221;? Teapots. That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Gates&#8221; in Central Park were better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
