<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexist Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:09:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-581374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-581374</guid>
		<description>These ads get me in the mood to go and buy some coffee and make my man a steam cuppa.  LOL  Very sexy advertising to me!!!  Not offensive at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ads get me in the mood to go and buy some coffee and make my man a steam cuppa.  LOL  Very sexy advertising to me!!!  Not offensive at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-446372</link>
		<dc:creator>John Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-446372</guid>
		<description>Miss Cellania and Jess are dead wrong.  They are too young to understand this ad or the era in which it was produced.  I was born in the early 1950s, and I can assure everyone that the ad WAS meant to be funny -- and not to convey the idea that it was OK or common for a husband to spank a wife.  The ad was a sort of exaggeration/caricature.  The fact is that, collectively speaking, men were MORE respectful of women prior to 1960 than they have been since that year.  There is FAR MORE hatred and disdain and objectifying of women by men in our day than there was in the 1950s -- primarily because of the availability of (1) no-fault divorce, (2) hormonal birth control and abortion, and (3) a bad strain of &quot;women&#039;s liberation&quot; that masculinized many women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Cellania and Jess are dead wrong.  They are too young to understand this ad or the era in which it was produced.  I was born in the early 1950s, and I can assure everyone that the ad WAS meant to be funny -- and not to convey the idea that it was OK or common for a husband to spank a wife.  The ad was a sort of exaggeration/caricature.  The fact is that, collectively speaking, men were MORE respectful of women prior to 1960 than they have been since that year.  There is FAR MORE hatred and disdain and objectifying of women by men in our day than there was in the 1950s -- primarily because of the availability of (1) no-fault divorce, (2) hormonal birth control and abortion, and (3) a bad strain of "women's liberation" that masculinized many women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-329044</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-329044</guid>
		<description>Thank you Nora, your so right on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Nora, your so right on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silencer</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-326526</link>
		<dc:creator>silencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-326526</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t tell you how many women I dated asked me to spank them. I don&#039;t do it, or get it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't tell you how many women I dated asked me to spank them. I don't do it, or get it.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-326367</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-326367</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad genders are treated equal in today&#039;s media. Now I guess I&#039;ll go watch my favorite sitcom. It&#039;s that one where the husband is a stupid, overweight, alcoholic, blue-collar oaf and his wife is attractive, witty and holds everything together and he&#039;s lucky to have her. You know the one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad genders are treated equal in today's media. Now I guess I'll go watch my favorite sitcom. It's that one where the husband is a stupid, overweight, alcoholic, blue-collar oaf and his wife is attractive, witty and holds everything together and he's lucky to have her. You know the one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muenster</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-326055</link>
		<dc:creator>muenster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-326055</guid>
		<description>How many times do I have to tell you, No man likes stale coffee !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times do I have to tell you, No man likes stale coffee !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capella</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-326032</link>
		<dc:creator>Capella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-326032</guid>
		<description>I dunno, she doesn&#039;t look too unhappy about this erm...predicament.
&quot;Please, honey, find out...!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, she doesn't look too unhappy about this erm...predicament.<br />
"Please, honey, find out...!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoonCake</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-326031</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonCake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-326031</guid>
		<description>nicholas-- what a great analysis.  if nobody else commented on this, it would be ok because yours justifies the very essence of this post.  kudos.

this would have been perfect to bring in to my women&#039;s studies class last spring.  they would have torn it APART!  of course, they tore me apart when i said slutty girls have it coming... but that&#039;s an entirely different story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nicholas-- what a great analysis.  if nobody else commented on this, it would be ok because yours justifies the very essence of this post.  kudos.</p>
<p>this would have been perfect to bring in to my women's studies class last spring.  they would have torn it APART!  of course, they tore me apart when i said slutty girls have it coming... but that's an entirely different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abestar</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-325769</link>
		<dc:creator>Abestar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-325769</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with the &#039;its naughty/sexy&#039; crowd but then not everyone likes it rough. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with the 'its naughty/sexy' crowd but then not everyone likes it rough. <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Dollak</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-325058</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Dollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-325058</guid>
		<description>Actually, while the ad does reflect a generally patronizing attitude toward women, it does not depict common practice.  It was actually meant to be humorous and possibly even a little &quot;naughty&quot; (hence the conspiratorial smile on the woman&#039;s face).

Yes, there have always been abusive spouses.  But from what I&#039;ve seen, a loutish husband is more likely to slap his wife around or punch her.  Spanking was a punishment reserved for children (and that is what&#039;s being referred to here).  If a man spanked his wife... more likely that was a &quot;kinky&quot; bit of sex play, not discussed in mixed company at the time.  (If you were aware of this little bit of &quot;deviant&quot; behavior, it made the ad spicier; otherwise, the sexual connotation went right past you.)  There was more of this raciness in women&#039;s magazines than a lot of people nowadays realize.

We tend to have a rather distorted view of the 1950s, shaped by old TV shows and &quot;stodgy&quot; older relatives.  Admittedly, today&#039;s TV shows and movies tend to be more explicit than those of the &#039;50s, which were restricted by heavy censorship rules.  However, a look at (usually print) media aimed specifically at adults reveals that there was already a lucrative market for sexually-oriented products and fiction directed at both men and women.  The TV soap opera began in the 1950s as a means of entertaining hausfraus with stories of illicit affairs.  Ladies&#039; magazines included similar stories, but with greater detail.  Their purpose was to entertain, and perhaps to provide some sort of gratification so these stuck-at-home-all-day ladies would be in fact LESS likely to cheat on their spouses (but still be &quot;in the mood&quot; when he got home).  A perusal of magazines in the checkout lane at the local supermarket shows us that not much has changed except the language and amount of visible skin.

As for whether it&#039;s funny or not, that&#039;s pretty subjective.  Societal attitudes have changed enough that fewer people nowadays would find this as funny as it once was.  More people today either misconstrue it, or need it explained, or &quot;get&quot; it but just don&#039;t personally find it funny (that would be me).  My parents were both in their late teens when this ad was run.  It&#039;s possible that, had they been a little older, they would have found it funny --- back then.  Remember, just because someone was alive in the 1950s doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re stuck there (and not everyone in the 1950s had the same attitude either); both supported the Women&#039;s Lib movement, and found corporal punishment vastly inferior to constructive communication.  By the 1970s, they probably would have found it dated and rather embarrassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, while the ad does reflect a generally patronizing attitude toward women, it does not depict common practice.  It was actually meant to be humorous and possibly even a little "naughty" (hence the conspiratorial smile on the woman's face).</p>
<p>Yes, there have always been abusive spouses.  But from what I've seen, a loutish husband is more likely to slap his wife around or punch her.  Spanking was a punishment reserved for children (and that is what's being referred to here).  If a man spanked his wife... more likely that was a "kinky" bit of sex play, not discussed in mixed company at the time.  (If you were aware of this little bit of "deviant" behavior, it made the ad spicier; otherwise, the sexual connotation went right past you.)  There was more of this raciness in women's magazines than a lot of people nowadays realize.</p>
<p>We tend to have a rather distorted view of the 1950s, shaped by old TV shows and "stodgy" older relatives.  Admittedly, today's TV shows and movies tend to be more explicit than those of the '50s, which were restricted by heavy censorship rules.  However, a look at (usually print) media aimed specifically at adults reveals that there was already a lucrative market for sexually-oriented products and fiction directed at both men and women.  The TV soap opera began in the 1950s as a means of entertaining hausfraus with stories of illicit affairs.  Ladies' magazines included similar stories, but with greater detail.  Their purpose was to entertain, and perhaps to provide some sort of gratification so these stuck-at-home-all-day ladies would be in fact LESS likely to cheat on their spouses (but still be "in the mood" when he got home).  A perusal of magazines in the checkout lane at the local supermarket shows us that not much has changed except the language and amount of visible skin.</p>
<p>As for whether it's funny or not, that's pretty subjective.  Societal attitudes have changed enough that fewer people nowadays would find this as funny as it once was.  More people today either misconstrue it, or need it explained, or "get" it but just don't personally find it funny (that would be me).  My parents were both in their late teens when this ad was run.  It's possible that, had they been a little older, they would have found it funny --- back then.  Remember, just because someone was alive in the 1950s doesn't mean they're stuck there (and not everyone in the 1950s had the same attitude either); both supported the Women's Lib movement, and found corporal punishment vastly inferior to constructive communication.  By the 1970s, they probably would have found it dated and rather embarrassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Stanhope</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324971</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Stanhope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324971</guid>
		<description>Chase and Sanborn coffee?

She should be spanking him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chase and Sanborn coffee?</p>
<p>She should be spanking him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324932</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324932</guid>
		<description>Miss Cellania is right. The ad is offensive, not funny because at the time, it wasn&#039;t meant to be funny - it was   presenting a woman in her place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Cellania is right. The ad is offensive, not funny because at the time, it wasn't meant to be funny - it was   presenting a woman in her place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324909</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324909</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ted. Today&#039;s adverts have a lot of female to male sexism with women telling their Slow,Sluggish cave men how to do everything, so they don&#039;t get lost or confused. A lot of people don&#039;t even think about it, and just think its funny. 
If men say anything about such advertisements, they&#039;re &quot;over-reacting&quot; or are being &quot;pu$$ys&quot;.

But... thats humans for you. We do it with racial sensitive things as well. Black people can have exclusive clubs,orgs,tv channels, and make fun of white people (honkey, cracker,etc) ...but if a white person even looks at someone the wrong way... OMG RACIST.

Why is it that we can never figure out the concept of &quot;middle ground&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ted. Today's adverts have a lot of female to male sexism with women telling their Slow,Sluggish cave men how to do everything, so they don't get lost or confused. A lot of people don't even think about it, and just think its funny.<br />
If men say anything about such advertisements, they're "over-reacting" or are being "pu$$ys".</p>
<p>But... thats humans for you. We do it with racial sensitive things as well. Black people can have exclusive clubs,orgs,tv channels, and make fun of white people (honkey, cracker,etc) ...but if a white person even looks at someone the wrong way... OMG RACIST.</p>
<p>Why is it that we can never figure out the concept of "middle ground"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: achim</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324907</link>
		<dc:creator>achim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324907</guid>
		<description>a german gasstation is nowadays running a radiospot with a woman ordering a coffee at their &quot;bistro&quot; in a tone so flirty that i could pass as a sexhotline commercial. in the spot, her friend comments on her being so flirty, the woman replies &quot;maybe he is as good with other things as with making coffee ...&quot; 
the times of sexist advertising are not over. is it the coffee? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a german gasstation is nowadays running a radiospot with a woman ordering a coffee at their "bistro" in a tone so flirty that i could pass as a sexhotline commercial. in the spot, her friend comments on her being so flirty, the woman replies "maybe he is as good with other things as with making coffee ..."<br />
the times of sexist advertising are not over. is it the coffee? <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324848</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324848</guid>
		<description>Funny, but I would have described a lot of advertising these days as showing men as weak, stupid, and in need of a woman to lead them.

Is this a genuine ad? This woman looks like she&#039;s enjoying it a little too much.

(he&#039;s just testing her for freshness, I think)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, but I would have described a lot of advertising these days as showing men as weak, stupid, and in need of a woman to lead them.</p>
<p>Is this a genuine ad? This woman looks like she's enjoying it a little too much.</p>
<p>(he's just testing her for freshness, I think)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324843</guid>
		<description>I still laugh if anyone takes offense at ads like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still laugh if anyone takes offense at ads like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graham!</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324841</link>
		<dc:creator>graham!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324841</guid>
		<description>Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... pornography</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... pornography</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324836</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324836</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ... looks like fun ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm ... looks like fun <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weakly</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324808</link>
		<dc:creator>Weakly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324808</guid>
		<description>More like SEXY advertising!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like SEXY advertising!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324760</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324760</guid>
		<description>These ads are funny NOW, but only because they are so weird. In the 60s, they just reflected a woman&#039;s place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ads are funny NOW, but only because they are so weird. In the 60s, they just reflected a woman's place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324758</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324758</guid>
		<description>well, if that&#039;s funny then their humor sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, if that's funny then their humor sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324748</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324748</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you buddy ,It&#039;s funny -What&#039;s the point in  overanalizing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with you buddy ,It's funny -What's the point in  overanalizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324738</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324738</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s suppose to be funny, do people really take offense to this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's suppose to be funny, do people really take offense to this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zandt K</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324650</link>
		<dc:creator>Zandt K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324650</guid>
		<description>I think she is laughing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she is laughing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Opinionated Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324639</link>
		<dc:creator>The Opinionated Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324639</guid>
		<description>It was a different time. Honestly, how many women were abused and read this add and just wanted to buy some coffee if it prevented them from getting slapped around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a different time. Honestly, how many women were abused and read this add and just wanted to buy some coffee if it prevented them from getting slapped around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324632</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324632</guid>
		<description>...I think she&#039;s reaching for a knife!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...I think she's reaching for a knife!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-324534</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexist-advertising/#comment-324534</guid>
		<description>Ah typical Daily Mail article! They often believe that women should be in the kitchen making food and babies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah typical Daily Mail article! They often believe that women should be in the kitchen making food and babies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/33 queries in 0.023 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-09 23:50:57 -->