Comments on: Mythbusters: Are Elephants Afraid of Mice?

By: pirate

pirate — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:59:19 +0000

They didn't want to squash it! Well, that explains everything. Elephants and mice have a peace treaty.

By: brian

brian — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:25:10 +0000

Maybe they aren't afraid of the mouse. Maybe they just don't want to squash it?

By: Jesse

Jesse — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:53:13 +0000

To the guy who said it was the moving pile of crap...I just watched it on discovery and they do try it without the mouse...the elephant looks down but doesnt hesitate at all. However with the mouse it hesitated and backed off right away.

By: Cane Vandas

Cane Vandas — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:41:04 +0000

If you believe it is simply because elephants are being cautious or courteous because it is a small animal it is defiantly not the case. There have studies and reports of elephants that are actually quite cruel to small animals. They have been know to draw in birds with small pieces of food and then crush them with their massive feet when they got close.

By: Gadget5

Gadget5 — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:54:17 +0000

humm really those mythbusters are doing a good job breaking myth but I still hear again n again the same old myths like duck quack don't eco which was already proved wrong.

By: bobbo

bobbo — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:50:46 +0000

if you watched the show they shoe the dung moving alone vs the dung and the mouse.

By: papa tango

papa tango — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:44:36 +0000

Maybe the Aesop tale was about the Mouse and the Elephant. It seemed to me the Elephant was showing the mouse a courtesy by making sure Algernon was not under foot. Then again I may just be full of it.

Love the show even if the two guys are Doofs. The babe makes up for it with pure class.

By: Ozhan

Ozhan — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:24:23 +0000

MythBusters did a good job. IMO elephants dont afraid by mice but become disturbed by them. I dont afraid from bugs, I dont want them near me

By: Dino

Dino — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:49:28 +0000

Please note... The mythbusters said that the myth was PLAUSIBLE. They did not say that it was confirmed. So please, cut them some slack.

By: MrPumpernickel

MrPumpernickel — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:42:30 +0000

...and also, the myth isn't "Elephants are afraid of rabbits/cats/shrimp/beetles/etc", though they could indeed have tested other kinds of mice, as well as plastic mice, and other kinds of deployment.

By: Allison

Allison — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:54:38 +0000

My guess is that they did not test other animals because they were so sure that the myth would be busted. Adam mentions the fact that when he woke up that morning he was CERTAIN that it was not possible.

I can imagine that they will need to revisit this.

Consulting someone who specializes in Animal Behavior would be a good idea, too.

By: MrPumpernickel

MrPumpernickel — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:41:44 +0000

No they didn't try it with other critters. And for all of you who says it was probably because of the dung moving I have to repeat what has already been said: They did a test with just the dung and the elephant did not react. So much for that theory. They did it again with the mouse however and the elephant reacted the same again, so it's obvious the elephant was reacting to the mouse and not the dung.

As to why, that's anyone's guess. They did not however confirm the myth that elephants are afraid of mice, they simply called it plausible, which is not stretching it too far I think, no matter of how unscientific it may be.

By: anon

anon — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:10:59 +0000

Justin (#17) - you made my day... "aaahhh! A mouse! Help! Don't let it get up my nose.... gaaaah!"

For those who saw the whole episode, did they try the same experiment with other critters?

By: emptyminded

emptyminded — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:12:35 +0000

I think the Mythbuster's should test Reechard's comment and set some pigs on fire around the elephants, for purely scientific reasons of course. It's not as if I would find any entertainment value in such a spectacle.

In any event, these guys are my heroes.

By: dan

dan — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:40:13 +0000

maybe it was the moving dung?

"OH SHIT!DID MY DUNG JUST MOVED BY ITSELF!WHOAAA!"

i would be scared "shitless" it that would happen,no pun intended

By: Allison

Allison — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:58:47 +0000

I think that, while they could have been more thorough in their testing, they did a fine job.

I know of stranger things that happen in nature and have perfectly logical explanations that just aren't apparent right off.

I doubt it has anything to do with the contrast in colors...elephant's don't have very strong eye sight and from what I remember, most of it is centered around movement, not color. Not to say that using a brown mouse once would have been a bad idea.

Also, the fishing wire was not the problem. In the full episode, the elephant walks right through it in the control experiment.

These elephants are not wild, they are in captivity...one of the reasons they used these were that they were not trained like circus elephants but they were also not dangerous, like wild elephants. The scent of humans shouldn't have played that great a role since they have keepers in their habitat often....their food is from people.

By: Justin

Justin — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:27:26 +0000

This was amazing! I wonder if Elephants are naturally afraid of small animals like mice because they can run up their nose and cause serious problems. (ok this sounds really dumb when I re-read this, but makes some sense to me)

By: nock

nock — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:11:39 +0000

I think the contrast makes them wary. There would be genetic fitness in staying away from high contrast objects such as poisonous flowers/fruits/snakes/insects. They should have tried different colored mice.

By: jenny

jenny — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:57:15 +0000

wow! haha amazing
and as for twodragons theory, the albino mouse might have freaked them out, but i dont believe they have good eyesight, making it probably not matter too much
and also, as you can see those elephants are used to humans, probably in a preserve because at the end they just walked over to the mythbusters and crew, and let them pet them.. making the smell of humans obviously not bother them

By: Reechard

Reechard — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:06:51 +0000

This reminds me of how they used to counter war elephants. They found that squealing pigs really freaked elephants out, so they would set pigs on fire and have them run around. Disgusting but hey, really interesting and it worked apparently.

By: Yak Boy

Yak Boy — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:44:34 +0000

Retrokatze, I think that Snopes article says it all. The sudden unexplained movement and the mouse's white fur contrasting the brown dirt would simply have startled the elephant enough to make it wary. Not to mention that the "monofilament" (fishing wire) was clearly visible and seemed to be cutting across the track. The Mythbusters don't know the meaning of the phrase "scientific method". All of their experiments have so many variables that aren't accounted for that almost all of their conclusions are questionable at best.

By: Greg

Greg — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:51:28 +0000

I agree with TwoDragons, although I think there is some truth to elephants being 'aware' of mice (I wouldn't wnat a mouse running up my schnoz either.) I wonder if it was not the contrast of white mouse on dark dirt that got the elephants attention. I wonder if the same would happen if a mouse ran infornt of the walking elephant?

By: Denita TwoDragons

Denita TwoDragons — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:28:08 +0000

I'm thinking it wasn't so much the presence of a mouse, as the fact that the dung rolled away and suddenly these pachyderms were confronted with an unnaturally-colored (albino) critter that stank of human. It didn't help that they were sitting right there, a few dozen feet from the elephants, with cameras trained upon them. They were probably already pretty edgy at that point!

Try it with a wild-type mouse and no human odor while setting the test site MUCH further in the distance, and I doubt the results would have been the same!

--TwoDragons

By: Retrokatze

Retrokatze — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:04:42 +0000

hmmm...

By: daversa

daversa — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:07:53 +0000

Michael, those are just glacier glasses that Jamie is wearing (still cool none the less!)

Here's a few
http://www.shopzilla.com/8B--Sunglasses_-_cat_id--10070000__keyword--b olle%20glacier%20glasses__kw--bolle%20glacier%20glasses__qcid--1861551

I'm not associated with that store, they just had a few.

By: Erik

Erik — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:57:16 +0000

at first i thought it was just the dung cap flipping over, but i really think it did notice the mouse. i think elephants will naturally take caution to small animals in feat that it will harm them (such as scorpion stings)

or, they may have a natural passion for not killing other animals that would never be able to harm them?

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:25:27 +0000

Adam took on some weight, didn't he?

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:25:19 +0000

I absolutely love Jamie's sunglasses. Steampunk!

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:04:23 +0000

Oooh Neatorama commentors are some of the smartest out there, even smarter than the Mythbusters. Too bad they spend more time commenting on other peoples failings than watching TV, otherwise they'd know that they did move the dung without the mouse, and the elephants didn't notice.

Not that the Mythbusters do everything right, but this time I think there's another explanation.

By: John Hopper

John Hopper — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:03:15 +0000

Yes, in the full episode they did try moving the dung w/out the mouse - it didn't bother them.