<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1960s Vision of Future Computer Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/11/1960s-vision-of-future-computer-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/11/1960s-vision-of-future-computer-technology/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:25:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jodie</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/11/1960s-vision-of-future-computer-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-218312</link>
		<dc:creator>jodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/11/1960s-vision-of-future-computer-technology/#comment-218312</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s so funny, &quot;the husband will pay for what the wife has spent&quot;. sounds great to me! no worries, just spend. 

also, is that Wink Martindale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that's so funny, "the husband will pay for what the wife has spent". sounds great to me! no worries, just spend. </p>
<p>also, is that Wink Martindale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 13:29:22 -->