<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only 13% Of The September Issue Of Vogue Is Editorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DCer</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-208567</link>
		<dc:creator>DCer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-208567</guid>
		<description>Well I certainly get Vogue for free because I'm a writer.

So who pays to get Vogue?

People buy the fashion magazines for the advertisements because the ads are the ways these companies communicate to other people in their field.

Working in retail, you read the fashion ads like programmers read Slashdot.  

More ads equal more content.  That's what vogue essentially markets, the ads.

It's as if no one here knew that, and that kind of illiteracy is a little scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I certainly get Vogue for free because I&#8217;m a writer.</p>
<p>So who pays to get Vogue?</p>
<p>People buy the fashion magazines for the advertisements because the ads are the ways these companies communicate to other people in their field.</p>
<p>Working in retail, you read the fashion ads like programmers read Slashdot.  </p>
<p>More ads equal more content.  That&#8217;s what vogue essentially markets, the ads.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if no one here knew that, and that kind of illiteracy is a little scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstruan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-207183</link>
		<dc:creator>jstruan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-207183</guid>
		<description>I appropriated a copy this evening.  The three-page table of contents roughly appears on pages 50, 100, and 150.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appropriated a copy this evening.  The three-page table of contents roughly appears on pages 50, 100, and 150.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-207157</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-207157</guid>
		<description>with that much advertising the mag should be free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with that much advertising the mag should be free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaby</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-207079</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-207079</guid>
		<description>I think ads are acceptable as long as they're good an clever ones, but I may be biased since that is my supposed area of expertise, I'm supposed to be up to date with ads and stuff like that.

The pictures in these mags are not bad either, of course that there must be bad ones in there but such is life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ads are acceptable as long as they&#8217;re good an clever ones, but I may be biased since that is my supposed area of expertise, I&#8217;m supposed to be up to date with ads and stuff like that.</p>
<p>The pictures in these mags are not bad either, of course that there must be bad ones in there but such is life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinderbox</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206987</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinderbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206987</guid>
		<description>Yeah, fashionistas and photographers are mostly looking at the ads anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, fashionistas and photographers are mostly looking at the ads anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluff</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206891</link>
		<dc:creator>fluff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206891</guid>
		<description>"But you donâ€™t have to pay to read a blog. I donâ€™t mind the concept of advertising, but Iâ€™m not going to pay to read it."

There was the a time when I went berserk about every single ad that appeared on my screen. Now that I am a regular reader of multiple blogs for quite some time I start to understand the implications of the business. 
I started to understand that almost none of the blogs I use to read could exists without ads.
But nonetheless I use adblock. And there is a reason for it; I like to read. I appreciate good content. But I am not willing to let my reading being disturbed by blinking, irritating stuff. I am not willing to participate in a forum where the posts are interrupted by something, some intellitxts and whole paragraphs of   something poppig up and links trying to fool me into clicking on them and then buying stuff I'd never need ever. Ever.
A sidebar with google ads. A decent banner here and there. I am willing to accept that. But the industry went to far. Some webadmins went to far.
There is a fair balance in everything. And that is why I use adblock and alter my hosts file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But you donâ€™t have to pay to read a blog. I donâ€™t mind the concept of advertising, but Iâ€™m not going to pay to read it.&#8221;</p>
<p>There was the a time when I went berserk about every single ad that appeared on my screen. Now that I am a regular reader of multiple blogs for quite some time I start to understand the implications of the business.<br />
I started to understand that almost none of the blogs I use to read could exists without ads.<br />
But nonetheless I use adblock. And there is a reason for it; I like to read. I appreciate good content. But I am not willing to let my reading being disturbed by blinking, irritating stuff. I am not willing to participate in a forum where the posts are interrupted by something, some intellitxts and whole paragraphs of   something poppig up and links trying to fool me into clicking on them and then buying stuff I&#8217;d never need ever. Ever.<br />
A sidebar with google ads. A decent banner here and there. I am willing to accept that. But the industry went to far. Some webadmins went to far.<br />
There is a fair balance in everything. And that is why I use adblock and alter my hosts file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206679</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206679</guid>
		<description>Engadget has ads? I would have never guessed. Seeing ads is part of my past since I started using Adblock Plus. I hate wasting bandwidth for ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engadget has ads? I would have never guessed. Seeing ads is part of my past since I started using Adblock Plus. I hate wasting bandwidth for ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206607</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206607</guid>
		<description>But you don't have to pay to read a blog. I don't mind the concept of advertising, but I'm not going to pay to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you don&#8217;t have to pay to read a blog. I don&#8217;t mind the concept of advertising, but I&#8217;m not going to pay to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206553</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206553</guid>
		<description>Running a lot of ads seems to work for large blogs like Engadget, too. (here's a &lt;a href="http://www.photoshopblog.net/2006/05/14/engadgetcom-a-visual-breakdown/" rel="nofollow"&gt;screen "real estate" analysis&lt;/a&gt; of the site circa 2006).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running a lot of ads seems to work for large blogs like Engadget, too. (here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.photoshopblog.net/2006/05/14/engadgetcom-a-visual-breakdown/" rel="nofollow">screen &#8220;real estate&#8221; analysis</a> of the site circa 2006).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206473</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206473</guid>
		<description>Buy, not be. Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy, not be. Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206465</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206465</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I wish I could say that this phenomenon is confined to needlessly expensive fashion magazines, but I remember the situation was much the same back in those halcyon days when I would be magazines like Transworld Skateboarding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I wish I could say that this phenomenon is confined to needlessly expensive fashion magazines, but I remember the situation was much the same back in those halcyon days when I would be magazines like Transworld Skateboarding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuimhne</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206427</link>
		<dc:creator>cuimhne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206427</guid>
		<description>Can't stand 'fashion magazines', that is ridiculous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t stand &#8216;fashion magazines&#8217;, that is ridiculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluff</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206419</link>
		<dc:creator>fluff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/09/02/only-13-of-the-september-issue-of-vogue-is-editorial/#comment-206419</guid>
		<description>"...The best part of most magazines, and especially fashion magazines, is the ads...."

Huh? I really have trouble understanding people that buy such crappy magazines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;The best part of most magazines, and especially fashion magazines, is the ads&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh? I really have trouble understanding people that buy such crappy magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
