<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help Desk Warning Sign.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorian</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-385651</link>
		<dc:creator>dorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-385651</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but where do you get a printable copy of the sign?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but where do you get a printable copy of the sign?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-210974</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-210974</guid>
		<description>Matt, I definately recognize a fellow help desk veteran here.  Bill, I agree that the blowtorch candidates provide great job security, but sometimes their impact on personal sanity quotients aren&#039;t worth it.  I personally plan to get a copy of this brilliant policy to post at work.
 &gt;;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I definately recognize a fellow help desk veteran here.  Bill, I agree that the blowtorch candidates provide great job security, but sometimes their impact on personal sanity quotients aren&#8217;t worth it.  I personally plan to get a copy of this brilliant policy to post at work.<br />
 &gt;;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-204477</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-204477</guid>
		<description>Helpdesk folks don&#039;t forget it is these blowtorch candidates that have you employed (job security). So be glad you have these stupid questions coming your way otherwise you would be cleaning Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpdesk folks don&#8217;t forget it is these blowtorch candidates that have you employed (job security). So be glad you have these stupid questions coming your way otherwise you would be cleaning Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-202177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-202177</guid>
		<description>I aggree with Matt, there are a few blowtorch candidates were i work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I aggree with Matt, there are a few blowtorch candidates were i work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-201922</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201922</guid>
		<description>There are three types of dumb questions:
1) Those that seem dumb to a help desk tech who&#039;s heard the same question fifty times before, even if the user hasn&#039;t.  (Not necessarily dumb.)
2) The types of questions that are thoroughly explained on the help desk&#039;s website, which the user ignores so as to have a live human being tell him the exact same thing. (Pretty dumb, but not worth the liability.)
3) The same question, over and over, from the same user. (Blowtorch candidate.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are three types of dumb questions:<br />
1) Those that seem dumb to a help desk tech who&#8217;s heard the same question fifty times before, even if the user hasn&#8217;t.  (Not necessarily dumb.)<br />
2) The types of questions that are thoroughly explained on the help desk&#8217;s website, which the user ignores so as to have a live human being tell him the exact same thing. (Pretty dumb, but not worth the liability.)<br />
3) The same question, over and over, from the same user. (Blowtorch candidate.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahm N. Since</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-201373</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahm N. Since</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201373</guid>
		<description>Stop crying.  This is *obviously* about the help desk&#039;s point of view.  That you can&#039;t realize that and instead whine that it should say the reverse demonstrates the validity of the sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop crying.  This is *obviously* about the help desk&#8217;s point of view.  That you can&#8217;t realize that and instead whine that it should say the reverse demonstrates the validity of the sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-201251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201251</guid>
		<description>There are no Stupid Questions... Just inquisitive idiots...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no Stupid Questions&#8230; Just inquisitive idiots&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-200791</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200791</guid>
		<description>I find, there is a need for this sign, but it reverse...if the help desk is stupid.....IT will be set on fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find, there is a need for this sign, but it reverse&#8230;if the help desk is stupid&#8230;..IT will be set on fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacyj</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-200530</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200530</guid>
		<description>Hey, at least they&#039;re gracious enough to provide fair warning ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least they&#8217;re gracious enough to provide fair warning &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie E</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-200235</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200235</guid>
		<description>Wow. I actually have this sign up where I work. That&#039;s brilliant. And yes, Mike S, there are some very stupid questions (along with some very stupid people).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I actually have this sign up where I work. That&#8217;s brilliant. And yes, Mike S, there are some very stupid questions (along with some very stupid people).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-200212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200212</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t this kind of fly in the face of, &#039;there are no stupid questions&#039; etc? If people need help don&#039;t they, um, need help, no matter what their level of proficiency? How about a line of signs regarding impatient, arrogant, or just generally difficult help desk people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this kind of fly in the face of, &#8216;there are no stupid questions&#8217; etc? If people need help don&#8217;t they, um, need help, no matter what their level of proficiency? How about a line of signs regarding impatient, arrogant, or just generally difficult help desk people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:00:10 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0991 seconds -->
