<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help Desk Warning Sign.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dorian</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-385651</link>
		<dc:creator>dorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-385651</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but where do you get a printable copy of the sign?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but where do you get a printable copy of the sign?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-210974</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-210974</guid>
		<description>Matt, I definately recognize a fellow help desk veteran here.  Bill, I agree that the blowtorch candidates provide great job security, but sometimes their impact on personal sanity quotients aren't worth it.  I personally plan to get a copy of this brilliant policy to post at work.
 &#62;;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I definately recognize a fellow help desk veteran here.  Bill, I agree that the blowtorch candidates provide great job security, but sometimes their impact on personal sanity quotients aren&#8217;t worth it.  I personally plan to get a copy of this brilliant policy to post at work.<br />
 &gt;;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-204477</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-204477</guid>
		<description>Helpdesk folks don't forget it is these blowtorch candidates that have you employed (job security). So be glad you have these stupid questions coming your way otherwise you would be cleaning Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpdesk folks don&#8217;t forget it is these blowtorch candidates that have you employed (job security). So be glad you have these stupid questions coming your way otherwise you would be cleaning Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-202177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-202177</guid>
		<description>I aggree with Matt, there are a few blowtorch candidates were i work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I aggree with Matt, there are a few blowtorch candidates were i work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201922</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201922</guid>
		<description>There are three types of dumb questions:
1) Those that seem dumb to a help desk tech who's heard the same question fifty times before, even if the user hasn't.  (Not necessarily dumb.)
2) The types of questions that are thoroughly explained on the help desk's website, which the user ignores so as to have a live human being tell him the exact same thing. (Pretty dumb, but not worth the liability.)
3) The same question, over and over, from the same user. (Blowtorch candidate.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are three types of dumb questions:<br />
1) Those that seem dumb to a help desk tech who&#8217;s heard the same question fifty times before, even if the user hasn&#8217;t.  (Not necessarily dumb.)<br />
2) The types of questions that are thoroughly explained on the help desk&#8217;s website, which the user ignores so as to have a live human being tell him the exact same thing. (Pretty dumb, but not worth the liability.)<br />
3) The same question, over and over, from the same user. (Blowtorch candidate.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahm N. Since</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201373</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahm N. Since</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201373</guid>
		<description>Stop crying.  This is *obviously* about the help desk's point of view.  That you can't realize that and instead whine that it should say the reverse demonstrates the validity of the sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop crying.  This is *obviously* about the help desk&#8217;s point of view.  That you can&#8217;t realize that and instead whine that it should say the reverse demonstrates the validity of the sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-201251</guid>
		<description>There are no Stupid Questions... Just inquisitive idiots...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no Stupid Questions&#8230; Just inquisitive idiots&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200791</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200791</guid>
		<description>I find, there is a need for this sign, but it reverse...if the help desk is stupid.....IT will be set on fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find, there is a need for this sign, but it reverse&#8230;if the help desk is stupid&#8230;..IT will be set on fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacyj</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200530</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200530</guid>
		<description>Hey, at least they're gracious enough to provide fair warning ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least they&#8217;re gracious enough to provide fair warning &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie E</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200235</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200235</guid>
		<description>Wow. I actually have this sign up where I work. That's brilliant. And yes, Mike S, there are some very stupid questions (along with some very stupid people).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I actually have this sign up where I work. That&#8217;s brilliant. And yes, Mike S, there are some very stupid questions (along with some very stupid people).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/26/help-desk-warning-sign/#comment-200212</guid>
		<description>Doesn't this kind of fly in the face of, 'there are no stupid questions' etc? If people need help don't they, um, need help, no matter what their level of proficiency? How about a line of signs regarding impatient, arrogant, or just generally difficult help desk people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this kind of fly in the face of, &#8216;there are no stupid questions&#8217; etc? If people need help don&#8217;t they, um, need help, no matter what their level of proficiency? How about a line of signs regarding impatient, arrogant, or just generally difficult help desk people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
