<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Recommendation Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyrole</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-191232</link>
		<dc:creator>hyrole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/#comment-191232</guid>
		<description>There isn&#039;t actually a page at criticker that shows the movies that you most likely will like (highest &quot;PSI&quot; - probable score index) with the highest score first. On all their recommendation pages they show random movies and then list the calculated PSI, so this kinda defeats the purpose. Hope they will improve on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t actually a page at criticker that shows the movies that you most likely will like (highest &#8220;PSI&#8221; &#8211; probable score index) with the highest score first. On all their recommendation pages they show random movies and then list the calculated PSI, so this kinda defeats the purpose. Hope they will improve on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosi</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-191102</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/#comment-191102</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t really seem to work... I rated about 200 films and it recommended me loads of black and white war films... I don&#039;t know why it thinks I like that.
It doesn&#039;t seem to use ANY kind of system that would be any use...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t really seem to work&#8230; I rated about 200 films and it recommended me loads of black and white war films&#8230; I don&#8217;t know why it thinks I like that.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t seem to use ANY kind of system that would be any use&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OS Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-190719</link>
		<dc:creator>OS Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 07:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/#comment-190719</guid>
		<description>I tried this criticker site, and after rating at least 200 movies in about an hour, I didn&#039;t like the way it recommened movies.  I much prefer http://movielens.umn.edu/main

about the site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MovieLens

its tech is based on a cool website that was around years ago called moviecritic.com, and adobe bought the site and technology used with the site, and closed it down.

Movielens simply works like this...
It takes your ratings patterns and bases its suggestions on the recommendations of other users with similar rating patterns.

Also about it here:
http://geohawk.blogspot.com/2004/03/movielens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this criticker site, and after rating at least 200 movies in about an hour, I didn&#8217;t like the way it recommened movies.  I much prefer <a href="http://movielens.umn.edu/main" rel="nofollow">http://movielens.umn.edu/main</a></p>
<p>about the site:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MovieLens" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MovieLens</a></p>
<p>its tech is based on a cool website that was around years ago called moviecritic.com, and adobe bought the site and technology used with the site, and closed it down.</p>
<p>Movielens simply works like this&#8230;<br />
It takes your ratings patterns and bases its suggestions on the recommendations of other users with similar rating patterns.</p>
<p>Also about it here:<br />
<a href="http://geohawk.blogspot.com/2004/03/movielens.html" rel="nofollow">http://geohawk.blogspot.com/2004/03/movielens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-190004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/#comment-190004</guid>
		<description>I got 5 pages in, at 25 movies per page, before I realized you not only have to click &quot;Seen it&quot;, then enter a score, but also click &quot;Submit&quot;, and wait for each movie to score.

What a PITA.  I agree with Ryan that a better scoring system is needed, particularly since the critics nearly universally use a 5-star scale.  Why does the average Joe suddenly need 100 stars?

If I want to spend my time on movie information, I&#039;ll stick with the Hollywood Stock Exchange.

http://rockhoppersdailygrind.blogspot.com/2007/07/for-movie-lovers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got 5 pages in, at 25 movies per page, before I realized you not only have to click &#8220;Seen it&#8221;, then enter a score, but also click &#8220;Submit&#8221;, and wait for each movie to score.</p>
<p>What a PITA.  I agree with Ryan that a better scoring system is needed, particularly since the critics nearly universally use a 5-star scale.  Why does the average Joe suddenly need 100 stars?</p>
<p>If I want to spend my time on movie information, I&#8217;ll stick with the Hollywood Stock Exchange.</p>
<p><a href="http://rockhoppersdailygrind.blogspot.com/2007/07/for-movie-lovers.html" rel="nofollow">http://rockhoppersdailygrind.blogspot.com/2007/07/for-movie-lovers.htm l</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-189998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/#comment-189998</guid>
		<description>I think the rating system needs improved. Treat it less like a school grade score. 50% should be ambivalent, not a complete fail. 

Otherwise your system really lacks nuance when only 100-80% is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rating system needs improved. Treat it less like a school grade score. 50% should be ambivalent, not a complete fail. </p>
<p>Otherwise your system really lacks nuance when only 100-80% is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuratkull.com &#187; Movie Recommendation Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-189961</link>
		<dc:creator>kuratkull.com &#187; Movie Recommendation Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/18/movie-recommendation-engine/#comment-189961</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Random Good Stuff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Random Good Stuff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:13:04 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1409 seconds -->
