Tracking Multiple Objects

1. Lala
   August 17th, 2007 at 9:18 pm

   i guess i'm better than i thought, i got a 3/4 on the difficult one and perfect score on easy and normal.

2. Tony
   August 17th, 2007 at 10:32 pm

   Technically, I got a perfect score on all three, but I really got 3/4 on the last one (I happened to guess correctly ).

3. uberjoe
   August 17th, 2007 at 10:33 pm

   I have to agree with Lala. Not that hard. I've heard that gaming has a great effect on a users ability to track multiple moving objects.

4. Another Jake
   August 18th, 2007 at 12:47 am

   It's oddly dependent on your strategy. If you try to follow them with your eyes, you're stuck. If you defocus and just observe the mass, you're all set. Any yes, it does remind me oddly of playing a healing class in WoW. hehe

   Consistently got 2/4 on Difficult and perfect on the easier ones. It's a little annoying though when 3 or 4 converge. Makes you momentarily look there to see which is the one you were trying to track... then you lose one of the other ones.

5. Daniel
   August 18th, 2007 at 1:40 am

   i have ADHD. i consistently got a perfect score regardless of the difficulty. in fact, it was easy to track all of the faces all of the time. yet, i can't count things, like ceiling tiles or coins, without making many errors. weird, huh?

6. raerae
   August 18th, 2007 at 4:54 am

   interesting--- I found it easy to get perfect scores on any level-- but there are so many things in this life I'm bad at. . .

7. raerae
   August 18th, 2007 at 5:00 am

   well--- a couple more tries on difficult revealed that it isn't easy to get a perfect score every time. . . when the objects do lots of crossing and converging, and are on opposite sides of the field, it's very difficult to track.

8. Amuseal
   August 18th, 2007 at 5:10 am

   It's only 3 of 4 possible to catch.

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT