<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women in Film.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-1845077</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-1845077</guid>
		<description>For those curious, the song is Bach&#039;s Cello Suite No. 1, 1st Movement &quot;Prelude&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those curious, the song is Bach&#8217;s Cello Suite No. 1, 1st Movement &#8220;Prelude&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: choggie kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-198431</link>
		<dc:creator>choggie kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-198431</guid>
		<description>That music is some Bach Cello concerto, and these heads a changin&#039; are psychedelic...added to the trippy-dippy playlist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That music is some Bach Cello concerto, and these heads a changin&#8217; are psychedelic&#8230;added to the trippy-dippy playlist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sallie</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-184787</link>
		<dc:creator>Sallie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-184787</guid>
		<description>God didn&#039;t make any junk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God didn&#8217;t make any junk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redphone</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-184237</link>
		<dc:creator>redphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-184237</guid>
		<description>Very rounded faces, ovals, round, ovals, rounds, ovals, and then square jaws really became the in-thing, eh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very rounded faces, ovals, round, ovals, rounds, ovals, and then square jaws really became the in-thing, eh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-184173</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-184173</guid>
		<description>is it me... or did a majority.. like a large majority of them have similar facial shapes? and eyebrows and eyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it me&#8230; or did a majority.. like a large majority of them have similar facial shapes? and eyebrows and eyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerse</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-184084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-184084</guid>
		<description>What is the title of the song?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the title of the song?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soops</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-184013</link>
		<dc:creator>soops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-184013</guid>
		<description>Squirlz Morph, the name of the free-ware program possibly used to do this :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squirlz Morph, the name of the free-ware program possibly used to do this <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-183799</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Greenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-183799</guid>
		<description>The actresses seem to get less beautiful toward the end. Some of the early ones were positively hypnotizing. The best eyes had to go to Sophia Loren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actresses seem to get less beautiful toward the end. Some of the early ones were positively hypnotizing. The best eyes had to go to Sophia Loren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Tithonus Pednaud</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-183767</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Tithonus Pednaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-183767</guid>
		<description>The shape of the eyes are notable as well. The early stars certainly had large, doe-like eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shape of the eyes are notable as well. The early stars certainly had large, doe-like eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-183715</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-183715</guid>
		<description>As with Women in Art, striking how similar many of the faces are - apart from Julia Roberts, who seems completely different</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with Women in Art, striking how similar many of the faces are &#8211; apart from Julia Roberts, who seems completely different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fine</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/comment-page-1/#comment-183511</link>
		<dc:creator>fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/13/women-in-film/#comment-183511</guid>
		<description>Cute thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:17:14 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0955 seconds -->
