<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DeLoreans Are Back to the Present (Maybe)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasse</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-176123</link>
		<dc:creator>Lasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 05:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/#comment-176123</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all nice and good, but how do we get it to hover?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all nice and good, but how do we get it to hover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadMolecule</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-175912</link>
		<dc:creator>MadMolecule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 02:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/#comment-175912</guid>
		<description>As long as we&#039;re picking nits, I&#039;d point out that the DeLorean wasn&#039;t really &quot;made famous&quot; by the movie.  When &quot;Back to the Future&quot; came out, I was 13, and it was common knowledge among everyone I knew what a DeLorean was.  Heck, that was part of the reason we were excited to see the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we&#8217;re picking nits, I&#8217;d point out that the DeLorean wasn&#8217;t really &#8220;made famous&#8221; by the movie.  When &#8220;Back to the Future&#8221; came out, I was 13, and it was common knowledge among everyone I knew what a DeLorean was.  Heck, that was part of the reason we were excited to see the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-175486</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/#comment-175486</guid>
		<description>well, resale value doesn&#039;t mean too much to a lot of people.  Speculators buy cars hoping to make money; ENTHUSIASTS buy cars to DRIVE them.   If it was possible to &quot;resume&quot; Delorean production the way Caterham resumed producing the Lotus 7 or the Avanti was produced decades following the death of Studebaker, that would be very cool.  It&#039;s gonna be tough though for any &quot;DMC2&quot;, though:

1. The stainless steel body panels are a *KEY* feature and they will be very tough to reproduce in small volume.
2. Frankly, the performance of the 2.8L Renault engine sucks (and always has).  That contributed to the car&#039;s less than stellar sales in the early 80s.  Do you keep the dog engine because it&#039;s historically accurate or move to something better?  I personally would go with something better... As Corey notes, this new car is not a real Delorean anyhow.  The current Caterham Seven uses a much nicer powertrain than the original Lotus Seven (and they sell!).  Keep everything that made the Delorean unique (rear engine, gullwing doors, stainless steel) and adapt the rest where necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, resale value doesn&#8217;t mean too much to a lot of people.  Speculators buy cars hoping to make money; ENTHUSIASTS buy cars to DRIVE them.   If it was possible to &#8220;resume&#8221; Delorean production the way Caterham resumed producing the Lotus 7 or the Avanti was produced decades following the death of Studebaker, that would be very cool.  It&#8217;s gonna be tough though for any &#8220;DMC2&#8243;, though:</p>
<p>1. The stainless steel body panels are a *KEY* feature and they will be very tough to reproduce in small volume.<br />
2. Frankly, the performance of the 2.8L Renault engine sucks (and always has).  That contributed to the car&#8217;s less than stellar sales in the early 80s.  Do you keep the dog engine because it&#8217;s historically accurate or move to something better?  I personally would go with something better&#8230; As Corey notes, this new car is not a real Delorean anyhow.  The current Caterham Seven uses a much nicer powertrain than the original Lotus Seven (and they sell!).  Keep everything that made the Delorean unique (rear engine, gullwing doors, stainless steel) and adapt the rest where necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coreysmoo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-175404</link>
		<dc:creator>coreysmoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/#comment-175404</guid>
		<description>Just so you know, these new DMC&#039;s will be VIN-less and therefore must be registered as kit cars.  I can&#039;t imagine the resale value on these to be very high.

Corey
Owner of DMC VIN# 2423</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know, these new DMC&#8217;s will be VIN-less and therefore must be registered as kit cars.  I can&#8217;t imagine the resale value on these to be very high.</p>
<p>Corey<br />
Owner of DMC VIN# 2423</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-175206</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/#comment-175206</guid>
		<description>And John Delorean wasn&#039;t the &quot;owner&quot; of Delorean Motor Company.  He was founder and Chairman, put there were a number of big $$$$ shareholders (and eventual creditors). 

Also, while it is useful to say that John Delorean was charged with (and acquitted on) drug charges, a larger impediment to the car&#039;s future is that HE&#039;S DEAD!

Actually, the biggest problem will be that the high dollar body stamping dies and related tooling were all destroyed.  Since there aren&#039;t any NOS body panels available, how is going to reproduce those?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And John Delorean wasn&#8217;t the &#8220;owner&#8221; of Delorean Motor Company.  He was founder and Chairman, put there were a number of big $$$$ shareholders (and eventual creditors). </p>
<p>Also, while it is useful to say that John Delorean was charged with (and acquitted on) drug charges, a larger impediment to the car&#8217;s future is that HE&#8217;S DEAD!</p>
<p>Actually, the biggest problem will be that the high dollar body stamping dies and related tooling were all destroyed.  Since there aren&#8217;t any NOS body panels available, how is going to reproduce those?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-175026</link>
		<dc:creator>No</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/06/deloreans-are-back-to-the-present-maybe/#comment-175026</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you are going to report something like this at least do a few fact checks to make sure you have it right. DeLorean was actually acquitted of the charges filed against him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you are going to report something like this at least do a few fact checks to make sure you have it right. DeLorean was actually acquitted of the charges filed against him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:39:29 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1011 seconds -->
