<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Laser Printer Hazardous to Your Health?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/01/is-laser-printer-hazardous-to-your-health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/01/is-laser-printer-hazardous-to-your-health/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/01/is-laser-printer-hazardous-to-your-health/comment-page-1/#comment-170667</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/01/is-laser-printer-hazardous-to-your-health/#comment-170667</guid>
		<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-sci-printers1aug01,1,5052452.story?ctrack=1&amp;cset=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LA Times&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;Among the machines that had no emissions were eight HP LaserJet 4050 series printers and four Ricoh Aficio models.

High emitters included the HP LaserJet 1320 and 4250, which, when printing, increased the particle number in the air more than tenfold.

The study did not consider variables such as printer age or cartridge type, leading to variations even among printers of the same model. The scientists noted that they found one HP LaserJet 5 to be a high emitter, while another was a non-emitter.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-sci-printers1aug01,1,5052452.story?ctrack=1&#038;cset=true" rel="nofollow">LA Times</a>:</p>
<p><em>Among the machines that had no emissions were eight HP LaserJet 4050 series printers and four Ricoh Aficio models.</p>
<p>High emitters included the HP LaserJet 1320 and 4250, which, when printing, increased the particle number in the air more than tenfold.</p>
<p>The study did not consider variables such as printer age or cartridge type, leading to variations even among printers of the same model. The scientists noted that they found one HP LaserJet 5 to be a high emitter, while another was a non-emitter.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonskippy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/01/is-laser-printer-hazardous-to-your-health/comment-page-1/#comment-170620</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonskippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/08/01/is-laser-printer-hazardous-to-your-health/#comment-170620</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s soooooo very dangerous that although numerous sites have mentioned this article - NONE have listed the printers that are bad (the article says that about 1/3 of the tested printers released bad amounts of particles - so list the freaking printers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s soooooo very dangerous that although numerous sites have mentioned this article &#8211; NONE have listed the printers that are bad (the article says that about 1/3 of the tested printers released bad amounts of particles &#8211; so list the freaking printers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:41:10 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0632 seconds -->
