<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jane Austen works rejected by publishers.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:43:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-160422</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-160422</guid>
		<description>So, basically, 16 out of 18 agents didn&#039;t reply. This doesn&#039;t mean they rejected Jane Austen&#039;s work - it could mean that 17 out of 18 recognized it and only two were stupid enough to waste their time with a response.
Is David Lassman maybe a little bitter about rejection of one of his books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, basically, 16 out of 18 agents didn't reply. This doesn't mean they rejected Jane Austen's work - it could mean that 17 out of 18 recognized it and only two were stupid enough to waste their time with a response.<br />
Is David Lassman maybe a little bitter about rejection of one of his books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XuYu</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-159512</link>
		<dc:creator>XuYu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-159512</guid>
		<description>&quot;A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.&quot; -- Mark Twain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read." -- Mark Twain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-159495</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-159495</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that, Justin. Corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that, Justin. Corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Anthony Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-159486</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Anthony Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-159486</guid>
		<description>Jane Aust*e*n, not Jane Aust*i*n.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane Aust*e*n, not Jane Aust*i*n.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-24 11:46:29 -->