<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jane Austen works rejected by publishers.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-160422</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-160422</guid>
		<description>So, basically, 16 out of 18 agents didn&#039;t reply. This doesn&#039;t mean they rejected Jane Austen&#039;s work - it could mean that 17 out of 18 recognized it and only two were stupid enough to waste their time with a response.
Is David Lassman maybe a little bitter about rejection of one of his books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, basically, 16 out of 18 agents didn&#8217;t reply. This doesn&#8217;t mean they rejected Jane Austen&#8217;s work &#8211; it could mean that 17 out of 18 recognized it and only two were stupid enough to waste their time with a response.<br />
Is David Lassman maybe a little bitter about rejection of one of his books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XuYu</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-159512</link>
		<dc:creator>XuYu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-159512</guid>
		<description>&quot;A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.&quot; -- Mark Twain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.&#8221; &#8212; Mark Twain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-159495</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-159495</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that, Justin. Corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that, Justin. Corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Anthony Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-159486</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Anthony Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/18/jane-austin-works-rejected-by-publishers/#comment-159486</guid>
		<description>Jane Aust*e*n, not Jane Aust*i*n.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane Aust*e*n, not Jane Aust*i*n.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:46:05 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0653 seconds -->
