<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vintage PC vs. Mac Ad Pictorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:05:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-154646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-154646</guid>
		<description>I agree, they both look like douchebags.  Build your own PC from bits you find in the garbabge and throw a found copy of Fedora or Ubuntu or FreeBSD onto it.  Oh yeah, get a girlfriend sometime too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, they both look like douchebags.  Build your own PC from bits you find in the garbabge and throw a found copy of Fedora or Ubuntu or FreeBSD onto it.  Oh yeah, get a girlfriend sometime too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-154085</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-154085</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out that it&#039;s not an ad, Lester and Nathan Hunt!

You&#039;re right, Theresa - in computer and technology terms, 1996 is not vintage. It&#039;s ancient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out that it's not an ad, Lester and Nathan Hunt!</p>
<p>You're right, Theresa - in computer and technology terms, 1996 is not vintage. It's ancient!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-154072</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-154072</guid>
		<description>And I think the PC guy is the little boy in the lard ad, all grown up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I think the PC guy is the little boy in the lard ad, all grown up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-154068</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-154068</guid>
		<description>When did 1996 become vintage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did 1996 become vintage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WV.Hillbilly</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-154055</link>
		<dc:creator>WV.Hillbilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-154055</guid>
		<description>Hey, it&#039;s Jerry Seinfeld!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it's Jerry Seinfeld!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acer</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-153981</link>
		<dc:creator>acer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-153981</guid>
		<description>as in the modern ads and the japanese ads, i prefer the pc guy.  smart beats trendy any day of the week with me. 

but, given the iphone lines, apparently trendy works for a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as in the modern ads and the japanese ads, i prefer the pc guy.  smart beats trendy any day of the week with me. </p>
<p>but, given the iphone lines, apparently trendy works for a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-153943</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-153943</guid>
		<description>So basically they&#039;re both douches, but the Mac user likes the smell of his own farts more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically they're both douches, but the Mac user likes the smell of his own farts more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-153839</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-153839</guid>
		<description>To clarify, this document was not actually an ad, but rather part of an article published in MacAddict in 1996 about the differences between Mac users and PC users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, this document was not actually an ad, but rather part of an article published in MacAddict in 1996 about the differences between Mac users and PC users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-153838</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-153838</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t actually an ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn't actually an ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisterTrilby</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-153834</link>
		<dc:creator>MisterTrilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/13/vintage-pc-vs-mac-ad/#comment-153834</guid>
		<description>Yuck, I wouldn&#039;t want to be either of those chaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck, I wouldn't want to be either of those chaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 18:16:45 -->