<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solving a maze with Photoshop.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:55:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Schend</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-136449</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/#comment-136449</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t require Photoshop. Any paint program with layers and a &#039;magic wand&#039; tool will work just as well, for example, Paint.NET, Paintshop Pro or GIMP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn't require Photoshop. Any paint program with layers and a 'magic wand' tool will work just as well, for example, Paint.NET, Paintshop Pro or GIMP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-136428</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/#comment-136428</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty neat!  

I always have just traced the maze backwards.  Most maze designers try to make the maze very difficult from beginning to end, but very few also make it difficult from end to beginning.  It only took me a couple minutes to visually solve from end to start, far less than it would have taken with the photoshop method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's pretty neat!  </p>
<p>I always have just traced the maze backwards.  Most maze designers try to make the maze very difficult from beginning to end, but very few also make it difficult from end to beginning.  It only took me a couple minutes to visually solve from end to start, far less than it would have taken with the photoshop method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yak Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-136370</link>
		<dc:creator>Yak Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/#comment-136370</guid>
		<description>This is functionally identical to how you can solve real physical mazes. Put your right hand on the wall to your right as you enter the maze, and keep it there as you follow it through to the exit.

Essentially, in both examples, you are splitting the maze in two. The entrance and exit divide the maze into two different wals that never touch each other. The line that divides the two walls is the shortest distance from the entrance to the exit.

However, both of these methods will only work on the simplest form of maze, that is a maze that has a single entrance and a single exit, each on the outside of the maze.

Many mazes, particularly of the physical variety, have one, or more, goals to be reached in the centre of the maze (often before reaching the final external exit). This method will not necessarily take you to a central goal, and in the case of multiple such goals, is almost guarantees you won&#039;t reach them all.

Another type of maze might be one with multiple exits. If only one is the correct exit, this method is not guaranteed to take you there, and if the designer of the maze is smart, this method will definitely not take you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is functionally identical to how you can solve real physical mazes. Put your right hand on the wall to your right as you enter the maze, and keep it there as you follow it through to the exit.</p>
<p>Essentially, in both examples, you are splitting the maze in two. The entrance and exit divide the maze into two different wals that never touch each other. The line that divides the two walls is the shortest distance from the entrance to the exit.</p>
<p>However, both of these methods will only work on the simplest form of maze, that is a maze that has a single entrance and a single exit, each on the outside of the maze.</p>
<p>Many mazes, particularly of the physical variety, have one, or more, goals to be reached in the centre of the maze (often before reaching the final external exit). This method will not necessarily take you to a central goal, and in the case of multiple such goals, is almost guarantees you won't reach them all.</p>
<p>Another type of maze might be one with multiple exits. If only one is the correct exit, this method is not guaranteed to take you there, and if the designer of the maze is smart, this method will definitely not take you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerse</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-136195</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/27/solving-a-maze-with-photoshop/#comment-136195</guid>
		<description>Kinda defeats the purpose, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda defeats the purpose, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-24 00:58:17 -->